The article states republicans flipped both state houses yet trump lost by 7%. The article brings up the fact that initial audits show all republican debate candidate’s had 6% of votes flipped. So correct me if I am wrong but a 6% flip would win trump the state taking into consideration removing those votes from Biden and adding them to TRUMP.
SB 43 will go up for a vote, if it passes then the AG is directed to allow a forensic audit of the 4 accu vote machines in Windham.
They already did a hand recount which was done in accordance with policy. What they want to do is run those ballots through each machine. One machine (#2) had a large anomaly in it's vote count. It's likely been rigged.
As importantly, there is some large voting irregularities in the votes received by Jeanne Shaheen (Sen.) throughout the state. So it's very likely that enough machines were rigged in the state to throw the election. A lot of the officials resisting this effort are GOP, so this is really wild what is going on.
The GOP officials resisting the effort are probably the Kemp's and Raffensperger's of NH. They made deals to secure their positions with rigged machines at the expense of the rest of their party.
Our governor "receive" the most votes for any office in the history of the state (while being despised by many on the right for being a RINO lockdown lover) and is entirely uninterested in looking at voter fraud.
Since these appear to be older AccuVote machines, fraud should be much easier to detect than the Dominion/ES&S machines. The older voting machines seem to have simpler algorithms. Back then, we didn't even have paper ballot optical scan machines. Most of the machines were DRE (direct electronic recorder), which just add votes to a digital counter and have no paper trail. They're really easy to rig.
I've heard from a lot of people on here from New Hampshire that they were sure that NH was going to flip based on how much support and enthusiasm they were seeing from Trump.
100% agree. I was watching VA like a hawk on election night. They had it blue immediately, but Trump was ahead with like 95% reporting in or something crazy. Then it flipped in the middle of the night just like all the other states. Trump was also ahead in Rhode Island for most of the night as well. I think there are a lot of states that would have flipped.
Heck, I'm hearing from Californians that were positive they were going to flip the state. People saying they got 17 first time voters to go out and all voted for Trump. I heard those stories over and over again. Nothing would surprise me at this point. We now know they have been cheating for years... and California is always the place where they try out their crazy ideas first.
Every single state uses electronic voting systems, except for a few rural counties in various states.
In fact, Dr. Shiva was running for Senate in Massachusetts last year. All of the counties, except for one (Franklin County) used voting machines. In Franklin County, which used hand marked hand counted paper ballots, Shiva won by 60/40 whereas he lost by 40/60 in every single county with the electronic machines. He did the math and filed a lawsuit. The MA Secretary of State allegedly asked Twatter to ban Dr. Shiva's account after deleting the ballot images (which were supposed to be kept for 22 months)
The rabbit hole goes deeper and deeper. Don't even get me started on the Wheel of Pennsylvania...
Wouldn't it be crazy if the tiniest state in our country ends up being the first domino.. if so should we start using a different analogy..?? Like snowball turning into an avalanche or something like that? HA
Also off topic but when I was checking myself for the appropriate phase, so I don't look like an uneducated dipshit, this was the first thing that came up: what a perfect "can you use that in a sentence" moment.
"To develop quickly and progressively into something bigger, more complex, more difficult, more dangerous, etc. This whole situation could snowball into a national scandal if the press gets wind of it."
NH wasn't even on the map of contested states, though I always suspected it had been stolen. It was I think a 1-point state in '16, very much in play in '20, and the level of fraud we know was effected in other states would have made it very easy to effect a 7-point swing in a state as small as NH this time.
If a state no one was even looking at flipped to Trump, it would really blow the doors open.
As an election junkie of many many years, I feel the urge to chirp in here.
This audit is obviously good news, the more the merrier.
However, I wouldn't expect any miracles and frankly a few of the claims in the linked article are a bit suspect.
First up, voters supporting one party for state level positions and another party for national positions is far from impossible. Infact it has been the order of the day in many states for decades. For many decades following the civil rights act, it was normal for many southern states to be completely dominated by D's while the same states were solidly red for presidential elections. This phenomenon has all but disappeared in the south due to political realignments.
However, this phenomenon is still widespread in the New England region where fairly liberal Republicans, and sometimes even conservative Republicans (Paul LePage springs to mind) will often be able to win governorships or other state level positions regardless of those states being solidly blue at the presidential level.
Also, remember that in the Rockingham district we saw roughly 300 votes missing from ALL republicans, so this seems to suggest that any fraud not only affected the presidential election but ALSO the state elections in favour of D's.
So claiming that a discrepancy between the state level results and the presidential results is somehow proof of fraud is fake news, which makes it really easy for D's and the MSM to disprove and hence make the accusations seem silly. Don't fall into that trap! Focus on the fact that 300 votes were missing instead.
Maybe this is one of the deep state's weaknesses. They didn't bother to secure states they thought they had in the bag, some of them might start doing investigations into their voting system and realize how massive the fraud is.
They are fighting hard to stop states that you might think would investigate, like Arizona. But who would have thought New Hampshire.
I've been hearing some suspicion about what happened in Colorado. However, not sure the legislatures there will do anything (they're probably Democrat controlled).
If New Hampshire finds something, maybe other states will find the courage to do their own investigations, like Pennsylvania for example.
The article states republicans flipped both state houses yet trump lost by 7%. The article brings up the fact that initial audits show all republican debate candidate’s had 6% of votes flipped. So correct me if I am wrong but a 6% flip would win trump the state taking into consideration removing those votes from Biden and adding them to TRUMP.
All federal races went Dem, all state races went Rep - by record numbers.
See below quick little series on the scam on a local site by a local guy.
https://granitegrok.com/mg_gilfordgrok/2020/11/a-little-red-state-with-a-big-blue-crown-prologue
https://granitegrok.com/mg_gilfordgrok/2020/11/a-little-red-state-with-a-big-blue-crown-chapter-1
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2020/12/a-little-red-state-with-a-big-blue-crown-chapter-2-the-senate
https://granitegrok.com/blog/2020/12/a-little-red-state-with-a-big-blue-crown-chapter-3
SB 43 will go up for a vote, if it passes then the AG is directed to allow a forensic audit of the 4 accu vote machines in Windham. They already did a hand recount which was done in accordance with policy. What they want to do is run those ballots through each machine. One machine (#2) had a large anomaly in it's vote count. It's likely been rigged. As importantly, there is some large voting irregularities in the votes received by Jeanne Shaheen (Sen.) throughout the state. So it's very likely that enough machines were rigged in the state to throw the election. A lot of the officials resisting this effort are GOP, so this is really wild what is going on.
The GOP officials resisting the effort are probably the Kemp's and Raffensperger's of NH. They made deals to secure their positions with rigged machines at the expense of the rest of their party.
Our governor "receive" the most votes for any office in the history of the state (while being despised by many on the right for being a RINO lockdown lover) and is entirely uninterested in looking at voter fraud.
Always a red flag
Since these appear to be older AccuVote machines, fraud should be much easier to detect than the Dominion/ES&S machines. The older voting machines seem to have simpler algorithms. Back then, we didn't even have paper ballot optical scan machines. Most of the machines were DRE (direct electronic recorder), which just add votes to a digital counter and have no paper trail. They're really easy to rig.
Honest question where’s it gonna go?
If the voting machines have had cheating algorithms for years, we don't even know which states are red or blue at this point.
THIS!
I've heard from a lot of people on here from New Hampshire that they were sure that NH was going to flip based on how much support and enthusiasm they were seeing from Trump.
Same even for just about every swing state. I think it's possible that Trump actually won MN, ME, NM and VA in addition to all the swing states.
100% agree. I was watching VA like a hawk on election night. They had it blue immediately, but Trump was ahead with like 95% reporting in or something crazy. Then it flipped in the middle of the night just like all the other states. Trump was also ahead in Rhode Island for most of the night as well. I think there are a lot of states that would have flipped.
Heck, I'm hearing from Californians that were positive they were going to flip the state. People saying they got 17 first time voters to go out and all voted for Trump. I heard those stories over and over again. Nothing would surprise me at this point. We now know they have been cheating for years... and California is always the place where they try out their crazy ideas first.
Their all red.
Soon they'll all be red. Red as in MAGA Red, not Republican red. The Republican Party will be obliterated soon
Truth.
Anyone know how long they have been using it?
Also, keeping in mind that ballot stuffing happened, as did ballot destruction and other frauds.
Electronic voting machines have been around for 20 years. Smartmatic has also been around for 20 years ;]
Well, not every state has been using them though right?
I really need America to recover from this because if America falls, the world falls.
Every single state uses electronic voting systems, except for a few rural counties in various states.
In fact, Dr. Shiva was running for Senate in Massachusetts last year. All of the counties, except for one (Franklin County) used voting machines. In Franklin County, which used hand marked hand counted paper ballots, Shiva won by 60/40 whereas he lost by 40/60 in every single county with the electronic machines. He did the math and filed a lawsuit. The MA Secretary of State allegedly asked Twatter to ban Dr. Shiva's account after deleting the ballot images (which were supposed to be kept for 22 months)
The rabbit hole goes deeper and deeper. Don't even get me started on the Wheel of Pennsylvania...
NH was razor-thin in 2016. No question that Hillary stole it.
Nah, 50% of the states had cheating going on.
"Isn't New Hampshire always a Democrat state?"
No, just briefly.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/09/recent_election_data_suggest_new_hampshire_returning_to_red_state_status.html
I always thought Trump won New Hampshire. Again.
Wouldn't it be crazy if the tiniest state in our country ends up being the first domino.. if so should we start using a different analogy..?? Like snowball turning into an avalanche or something like that? HA
Also off topic but when I was checking myself for the appropriate phase, so I don't look like an uneducated dipshit, this was the first thing that came up: what a perfect "can you use that in a sentence" moment.
"To develop quickly and progressively into something bigger, more complex, more difficult, more dangerous, etc. This whole situation could snowball into a national scandal if the press gets wind of it."
NH wasn't even on the map of contested states, though I always suspected it had been stolen. It was I think a 1-point state in '16, very much in play in '20, and the level of fraud we know was effected in other states would have made it very easy to effect a 7-point swing in a state as small as NH this time.
If a state no one was even looking at flipped to Trump, it would really blow the doors open.
As an election junkie of many many years, I feel the urge to chirp in here.
This audit is obviously good news, the more the merrier.
However, I wouldn't expect any miracles and frankly a few of the claims in the linked article are a bit suspect.
First up, voters supporting one party for state level positions and another party for national positions is far from impossible. Infact it has been the order of the day in many states for decades. For many decades following the civil rights act, it was normal for many southern states to be completely dominated by D's while the same states were solidly red for presidential elections. This phenomenon has all but disappeared in the south due to political realignments.
However, this phenomenon is still widespread in the New England region where fairly liberal Republicans, and sometimes even conservative Republicans (Paul LePage springs to mind) will often be able to win governorships or other state level positions regardless of those states being solidly blue at the presidential level.
Also, remember that in the Rockingham district we saw roughly 300 votes missing from ALL republicans, so this seems to suggest that any fraud not only affected the presidential election but ALSO the state elections in favour of D's. So claiming that a discrepancy between the state level results and the presidential results is somehow proof of fraud is fake news, which makes it really easy for D's and the MSM to disprove and hence make the accusations seem silly. Don't fall into that trap! Focus on the fact that 300 votes were missing instead.
SCOTUS declared it to be "moot".
It's a 10- 14 split leaning R
Trump has it all...
Maybe this is one of the deep state's weaknesses. They didn't bother to secure states they thought they had in the bag, some of them might start doing investigations into their voting system and realize how massive the fraud is.
They are fighting hard to stop states that you might think would investigate, like Arizona. But who would have thought New Hampshire.
I've been hearing some suspicion about what happened in Colorado. However, not sure the legislatures there will do anything (they're probably Democrat controlled).
If New Hampshire finds something, maybe other states will find the courage to do their own investigations, like Pennsylvania for example.