It wasn’t jet fuel, it was airplanes flying at crazy speeds causing mechanical strain/heat to the frame. Every bend a paper clip back and forth til and breaks and feel how hot they get?
Not saying there weren’t also explosives placed. But no one thinks jet fuel caused the buildings to go down “.
3 towers came down on 9/11. one was not hit by a plane, this was building 7. all three towers, 1,2 and 7 were the first steel skyscrapers in human history to collapse directly into their footprint due to ‘fire’. Statistically impossible all 3 would collapse in this way unlike any other fire in a steel skyscraper in the world, all on the same day.
I feel like I’m in bizzaro world, I don’t remember people talking about building 7 before today. Probably because in the 9/11 days I was still watching misleadia.
Oh yes they fuckin do. Also do a comparison of the materials and see just how plausible it would be for it to do damage... then walk back those finings to the impact speed and ask yourself why if they were blowing well passed their VMO was there no obvious structural damage to the planes before impact.
Even "weakening the integrity" would not have caused a free-fall implosion.
It wasn’t jet fuel, it was airplanes flying at crazy speeds causing mechanical strain/heat to the frame. Every bend a paper clip back and forth til and breaks and feel how hot they get?
Not saying there weren’t also explosives placed. But no one thinks jet fuel caused the buildings to go down “.
tell that to Building 7
You lost me on that reference, but I’m happy to read about.
It wasn't just the twin towers that buckled. A nearby building that wasn't hit fell the same way. No jetfuel, no big planes smashing. Same fate.
Did they allege that to be a shockwave? Or what? I don’t remember hearing about that, but I was 20 years younger too.
Edit: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/most-americans-who-see-collapse-of-building-7-doubt-official-story-survey-finds-300914145.html
No WAY did fires take down that building wth.
3 towers came down on 9/11. one was not hit by a plane, this was building 7. all three towers, 1,2 and 7 were the first steel skyscrapers in human history to collapse directly into their footprint due to ‘fire’. Statistically impossible all 3 would collapse in this way unlike any other fire in a steel skyscraper in the world, all on the same day.
I feel like I’m in bizzaro world, I don’t remember people talking about building 7 before today. Probably because in the 9/11 days I was still watching misleadia.
Oh yes they fuckin do. Also do a comparison of the materials and see just how plausible it would be for it to do damage... then walk back those finings to the impact speed and ask yourself why if they were blowing well passed their VMO was there no obvious structural damage to the planes before impact.
Even "weakening the integrity" would not have caused a free-fall implosion.
Who actually thinks it’s jet fuel? May a hand ful of retards out there, but I’ve never encountered any that weren’t trying to troll.
That and the already proven support demolitions performed at the bottom will take a building down