I don't believe "long haul" means 4 years or whatever. I believe it means their team is with POTUS while we wait (a little longer--they keep implying that things will change SOON), then while he is "restored" if you want to call it that, and then through the completion of the MAGA process. It's not like there will be nothing left to do after POTUS is reinstalled in his rightful place!
I sure hope it's soon. The bills that they are trying to pass make me ill. The Equality Act in particular. As a Christian woman, I feel like the entire bill affects and hurts me. Between the religious freedoms it destroys and the fact that as a woman I would no longer have privacy in a bathroom or a locker room. It's horrifying to me.
I agree. A thought that came to me today is that this is like the old story of putting the frog in the water and slowly turning up the heat so you can boil it to death without it jumping out. That's what the ds has been trying to do to us for...centuries? I'm starting to really believe that Biden and the dems are being REQUIRED (by Trump and team) to do all of this insane stuff SO fast and crazy that almost EVERYONE turns into a Pepe and jumps out of the water before it really is too late. If things had continued going along slowly, we would have all continued thinking we were in the minority (we now know that is NOT the case) and would have continued incrementally being convinced to accept this stuff and feeling we had no other choice. Now, we are uniting and standing against it, which causes them to act even more frantic and erratic, which solidifies our unity and resolve that much more. Trump and his team are wise enough to know, however, that we are not going to be willing or able to be patient much longer. They're doing everything they can to prevent civil war and bloodshed. I believe they understand that this has to stop soon and are pacing everything accordingly.
They said they wouldn't name names in response to someone asking which anons were trustworthy to follow. This was part of a discussion of Charlie Ward and other paytriots/shill-anons. He gave a number of excellent criteria to use in evaluating whether someone was legit of not. Specific dates? Changing dates? Claim to have "insider sources"? Use your discernment and trust your gut. The comment about Pompeo and Flynn (Dan was included) was in response to whether or not comms and decodes were a legit thing for us to be doing (specifically, whether they are bothered by us trying to decode THEIR messages). He didn't specifically say we should or shouldn't analyze their timestamps, etc, (though he said earlier today that they might "gently guide us" to look at various things), but he did say that sometimes a post is just a post. He also said that theyTHEY actively watch posts from Dan, Flynn, and Kansas. I took those to be examples of some of the official people they know ARE specifically "authorized" to give us comms that confirm and point specifically to drops and other info. I didn't take that to mean they are the ONLY ones (for example, Don Jr and many others should be on that list), but George is not going to sit there and give us an exhaustive list of everyone. The not naming anyone comment was in regard to anons. Imagine the division and other problems that would be caused if they gave us a comprehensive list of all the anons who are and aren't "good" to follow. Very wise of them to not do that, but he did give us a "grading scale" you might call it, that we can use to judge what we hear.
My ultimate takeaway is that I don't believe GeorgeNews IS the Q team (though they might actually be and are tossing some decoy info to keep us off the trail), but they are another team working very closely with POTUS and with a LOT more inside scoop on what's really going on than what we have. So, not the full picture, but a much bigger piece than ours and authorization to help "bridge the gap" for us while we walk through this part of the crazy movie.
That livestream was a little demoralizing to me. Long haul...... we won't have a country in the "long haul"
I'll come back around, but the chat usually jazzes me up and it had the opposite effect today.
Still on... Watching trump's inauguration Bidens was trash lol
Hahahaha yeah I switched back over. The difference is astounding.
I don't believe "long haul" means 4 years or whatever. I believe it means their team is with POTUS while we wait (a little longer--they keep implying that things will change SOON), then while he is "restored" if you want to call it that, and then through the completion of the MAGA process. It's not like there will be nothing left to do after POTUS is reinstalled in his rightful place!
I sure hope it's soon. The bills that they are trying to pass make me ill. The Equality Act in particular. As a Christian woman, I feel like the entire bill affects and hurts me. Between the religious freedoms it destroys and the fact that as a woman I would no longer have privacy in a bathroom or a locker room. It's horrifying to me.
Lord, please save us from this evil. Amen
I agree. A thought that came to me today is that this is like the old story of putting the frog in the water and slowly turning up the heat so you can boil it to death without it jumping out. That's what the ds has been trying to do to us for...centuries? I'm starting to really believe that Biden and the dems are being REQUIRED (by Trump and team) to do all of this insane stuff SO fast and crazy that almost EVERYONE turns into a Pepe and jumps out of the water before it really is too late. If things had continued going along slowly, we would have all continued thinking we were in the minority (we now know that is NOT the case) and would have continued incrementally being convinced to accept this stuff and feeling we had no other choice. Now, we are uniting and standing against it, which causes them to act even more frantic and erratic, which solidifies our unity and resolve that much more. Trump and his team are wise enough to know, however, that we are not going to be willing or able to be patient much longer. They're doing everything they can to prevent civil war and bloodshed. I believe they understand that this has to stop soon and are pacing everything accordingly.
"...check TG..." -- You meant Telegram, I assume?
(Just to be clear here.)
"Then like a minute later they deleted it."
I'm getting tired of that gimmick too.
Yes telegram. They literally said "Check TG in 45 seconds"
Does seem gimmicky IMO I'll agree there.
George News has written on telegram that they post often and remove for security reasons. For what it's worth
How did he post his location? Address?
Shared location on telegram. Basically you can click and see the location.
Trump running George News?
They said they wouldn't name names in response to someone asking which anons were trustworthy to follow. This was part of a discussion of Charlie Ward and other paytriots/shill-anons. He gave a number of excellent criteria to use in evaluating whether someone was legit of not. Specific dates? Changing dates? Claim to have "insider sources"? Use your discernment and trust your gut. The comment about Pompeo and Flynn (Dan was included) was in response to whether or not comms and decodes were a legit thing for us to be doing (specifically, whether they are bothered by us trying to decode THEIR messages). He didn't specifically say we should or shouldn't analyze their timestamps, etc, (though he said earlier today that they might "gently guide us" to look at various things), but he did say that sometimes a post is just a post. He also said that theyTHEY actively watch posts from Dan, Flynn, and Kansas. I took those to be examples of some of the official people they know ARE specifically "authorized" to give us comms that confirm and point specifically to drops and other info. I didn't take that to mean they are the ONLY ones (for example, Don Jr and many others should be on that list), but George is not going to sit there and give us an exhaustive list of everyone. The not naming anyone comment was in regard to anons. Imagine the division and other problems that would be caused if they gave us a comprehensive list of all the anons who are and aren't "good" to follow. Very wise of them to not do that, but he did give us a "grading scale" you might call it, that we can use to judge what we hear.
My ultimate takeaway is that I don't believe GeorgeNews IS the Q team (though they might actually be and are tossing some decoy info to keep us off the trail), but they are another team working very closely with POTUS and with a LOT more inside scoop on what's really going on than what we have. So, not the full picture, but a much bigger piece than ours and authorization to help "bridge the gap" for us while we walk through this part of the crazy movie.