Well I have to say that I am deeply disappointed in this post. You question whether George News is real and yet you have only done a simple investigation into "who" they are and yet you post it here for all to see. When Q first started did you question their authenticity? Did you do a deep dive to see if they are real? Did you dig into the copyright of Q? George News has provided a great deal of hope to many people, they have provided pictures and videos that newspeople do not have access to and they have said many times that they do not and will not ask for donations. People give because they have hope and it makes them feel like they are doing something positive. I also see no problem with them selling shirts, etc., because it's what people have asked for. As for not being able to trace their "location" or isp or anything else, I'm sorry but isn't that all part of remaining in a covert status? How many times did Q change sites because of the DS attacking their pages? LOTS! I can personally attest to that because I have been following them since the beginning.
Fact of the matter is NONE of us actually KNOW if Q is real or if George News is real - we all WANT them to be real, we follow them and we red pill people and we TRUST that they are real but in fact we have zero actual proof of that being true.
I am not saying not to question either of them - I am saying be careful of spreading disinformation without actual evidence. The reason I say this is because what if you are wrong? Reading the comments people have already bought into your distrust...this is a very bad thing if you are wrong...
I also think you need to consider this - it comes from George News and was shared by another fren here:
"Christian_Patriots 2 point 1 hour ago +2 / -0 https://t.me/s/georgenews/660
03/02/2021 #UPDATE
When we moved from our Twitter account that had close to 300K followers, dozens of people immediately tried to 'fill the void', and 'be' us. They have tried soliciting for 'donations' on Gofundme, CaspApp, Venmo, through fake Paypal's as well as Bitcoin.
So, it is absolutely necessary, that we 'claim' EVERY aspect of the online space, to STOP these people doing what they are doing, from all the way down there in mommy's basement.
To say again; We don't have a 'GEORGE' PayPal, CashApp, Venmo etc, we don't use ANY crypto.. We are NOT on Teespring anymore. We STOPPED using them a month ago. We will never ever be on GOFUNDME either, (unless we are promoting a cause that we 100% believe in, that is not our own)
So right now, we are in the process of verifying all our socials. We are self funded but you having our site and name on your chest or back, helps MORE than you realize. It's a catch 22 really, if we don't, someone else will, and we don't want people to think they are buying something that is not officially linked to us.
If you're new here, you have probably asked yourself, 'who is GEORGE NEWS?'
In a nut shell, we are Patriots. We have been 'online' for a long time. Both by the name you know us by now, and another. We are also credentialed for WH, State, and DoD. Yes, we are known to WH Admin (current and very much the great team 45 one) We have been invited to many secure 45 events, both locally and internationally and are also known to the WH Travel Office. Basically, we are here for the long haul. We are NOT planning on going anywhere. We are IN this. Also please note, messages we may delete here are these:
The same url / link / shared message from another group that has been posted multiple times within a recent time frame, as well as spam bot type messages staring with a "/" forward slash.
Messages asking you to email or call them (with number or email address showing)
Any form of doxing or harassment, etc.,
ANY type of message relating to a free "DJT 45" COIN.. there are no official coins available.
And lastly, if in doubt, ALL our links are at https://linktr.ee/georgenews and our two store links are:
"GEORGENEWS.SHOP" https://georgenews.shop for home, and https://GEORGENEWS.redbubble.com for office.
They are both, our NEW and Official partners.
Have a GREAT day!
G MAN OUT!"
I WOULD ADD THIS: George News stated earlier that there are groups out there taking the photos that they have been sharing and are manipulating them and using them for their own agenda's - this is why George News has been only leaving photos up for very short time periords. George News is trying to protect the integrity of their name and the data they share.
I just think we need to be careful who we condemn in today's climate - especially those that give hope to the people.
I'm sorry if I have offended anyone but I just had to speak up.
Anon1751 OUT.
I know this is a relatively minor thing to pick out, but what is the logic of the above? Leaving photos up for a very short period of time does very little to dissuade someone intent on swiping George's pictures for their own selfish purposes, but would certainly make it harder for anyone to subsequently trace their provenance.
I wasn't even addressing the content or its quality, just the inexplicable logic of removing posted photos as a mechanism to protect their original photos, or photos which they had exclusive rights to.
Once an image is posted on the internet, it's very difficult to control its use or misuse - the best you can do is maintain the availability of the image so you can be referenced as the original source. Also, watermarking would likely be the most effective way to dissuade a casual mid-appropriator.
I suppose it means we should look out for people claiming the photos were theirs in the future and see who they are. It would have to be a high level "secret" official taking them. We either learn who took the photos, or we learn who sold them. Or game them to george.
The (minor) point remains unanswered, how would it be possible, much less more possible, for us to look out for these if George remove any images against which they could be compared after a short time.
Perhaps I'm simply misunderstanding what they were doing with this particular ruse, but as described, it is counter-logical.
That is a good point, but people are saving these things and george asked to have them verified as "originals" via specific image search sites. I think any image search should be also fair game if they are truly original photos.
Yeah. Some people might not be particularly keen on being systematically "trained" by manipulative Internet strangers. ?♂️
I'm sorry they are not leaving them up for your convenience.
Is George buying these images? If so, from whom? Laws don't prevent a legal transaction.
Why didn't you just add this research to that thread? This is an ongoing discussion.. Why are you on here defending "yourself" (you do seem to be claiming you are George in this post) if the truth will be told by a simple investigation by the people who are most curious about you? The people who support you. Are you afraid of losing money, or sharing the truth?
Give me a break, in no way does it sound like I am George News. I started a new one because I didn't want it getting LOST in the hundreds of other responses. I felt it was important enough to start a new thread.
To be honest when I read this the first time, I read quickly.. (on purpose maybe to prove a point.) It made me think you were having George's responses yourself. For that I apologize. I do still firmly believe you should post this in Evspras thread as that will mean more to the over all discussion and more people will read what you have to say. You might not get the attraction you desire, but it will actually be helpful.
I would have missed it over there, am George skeptic, so this was a worthwhile read. Thanks Anon1751
I agree, I might not have seen this if he hadn't posted it separately. We should all be part of the larger discussion. I advocated for the OP to also post in the original post. Obviously I am okay with also discussing it outside of that. Good for everyone to have multiple venues of discussion.
I just brought up the feeling someone who was looking into this stuff would have. Good quotes.
I happen to agree with you on this. The culture here is getting a bit ridiculous with all the banning and whatnot. When did our right to choose who and what we follow become subject to mod/admin discretion? If the mods/admins believe the the info from GEORGE is somehow suspect then require an unverified tag to any posts linking to them. Theres a few different ways this could be approached but I'm not down with flat out banning anyone. If people can still post links to assholes like Charlie Ward and any of the other scabs then why is GEORGE so deserving of a ban? Because they sell shirts and coffee mugs? And just to give you a bit of perspective I don't even have their channel on telegram and dont know if i buy any of the info from them I've seen posted here but banning and censorship is what we constantly criticize the other side for...when did we become 'them'?
Thank you Patriot. I agree with you, I don't agree at all with what is happening on this site.
Have you noticed they have behaving like the main stream media on a feeding frenzy? This behavior drastically lowers the respect and viability of this site hugely.
I have. I've been mainly going to 8kun and wearethene.ws for I do these days. Every time I check in here the climate gets a little more hostile. This is an exact repeat of what happened in TGA subreddit way back when. Certain mods start taking over and divide up the group and from there it's simply a matter of time before it collapses under the weight of all the bullshit.
I agree with this, and I think one person is wielding too much influence on the topic.
Agreed.
Thank you Patriot, I agree.
Kudos to you for posting this. Critical thinking is crucial and I appreciate both Evspra's post and your post.
Agreed.
I agree. Haven't we as a people always said if you don't want to see, then don't look. The George site isn't hurting anyone and quite frankly I enjoy seeing the posts here for it because I can't stay up late enough to view the live chats.
I don't think this is "Q", but thank goodness someone here is protecting us from ourselves.
Need any books to be burned?
All I can say is-
Disinformation is necessary. Drop 1685, 1114, 158, etc. (May I suggest searching all Q drops with the word “disinformation”. Drop 4101 is interesting.)
No outside comms (drop 1318)
BUT
Backchannels are important (drop 4536 and many others, search for “backchannels”)
HELLO GEORGE (drop 529)
Use discernment. Caveat emptor.
If George is dis info, should we not discuss that, and be open to it?
I know the military plane videos are available to anyone, that isn't news to me. I am referreing to pictures and videos from President Trump meeting in North Korea. These are pictures I haven't seen anywhere else, not even on the site you provided.
Devil's advocate, but is it possible they (George) are also contributing to the content on dvidshub.net? They took it and then sent it there as well? They are listing the correct location, filming date, and posting date, and they (George) have the DoD/Pentagon logo (or whatever you'd call it) posted on their videos. I mean, presumably they're all on the same team and connected to DoD, so it's not THAT surprising for things to show up in more than once place, and the fact that we are told who took that particular video does not, IMHO, necessarily negate the entire picture of who George seems to be. Were there other videos besides that one that you found on both sites? Just curious. Thanks for the digging, Ev. This is all very interesting.
I copied my reply there. I’m on the fence but pretty open minded.
correct answer.
not in reply to OP, but what is with the comments being deleted here? I come in 7 hours after post and cannot follow the conversation because some low effort member here can not stand by their argument? why post comments just to delete them not even a day later? even if you realize you are wrong, at least let others see what you were saying so they can keep track of the whole conversation. makes me suspicious of that whole side of the argument.
I noticed that too, let me assure you I have not deleted any comments - this had to have been done by the mod that started this conversation.
Obviously a trust but verify situation. Twitter and instagram are used in comms as well so there's that.
I'm sure the Military videos and photos are shared from other sites but honestly what's wrong with that? I have seen (and I saved copied) photos and videos on George News that I have not seen anywhere else.
I disagree but to each his own...I have seen photos and videos that I have never seen anywhere else. They also do not claim any of the military photos as their own, they list where they came from and the date. I belive they know most people don't have the wherewithal to find them and so they share them with everyone. I know I enjoy them as do many other people from this site. It's a sad day when a few condemn someone without any real evidence...gee...where have we seen that before????