Francis is a deep church anti-Pope, Benedict XVI is still the one true Pope
(umygq6eejfjenat5tlk4ykpvky-adwhj77lcyoafdy-www-marcotosatti-com.translate.goog)
Comments (26)
sorted by:
imo they can all go fuck themselves. decentralize the church. no one can walk your path to God but you. No one can lead you but Jesus Christ.
Look into why world leaders bow to the Pope. And ask yourself. Why is this one man deemed the leader of the world by so many. Seems to me the Vatican's doctrine and beliefs violates our first amendment rights. Q+ understands this!
Which one was murdered after 13 days? That’s the true Pope.
Exactly. Mother Theresa was a human trafficker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVU3qtmT-gU
Benedict's a pedophile too.
Don't be fooled.
fake news.
You're fake news.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YZ7hMS3Llo
When were the books of the bible chosen and compiled into the bible and who compiled it?
I just researched this recently as I was looking for the reason that as a confirmed Lutheran, I didn't know anything about the book of Revelations. I drifted away from the Lutheran church as it became more liberal. But I didn't remember any sermons about it, or reading any lessons from it - yet, so many evangelicals and others here in the South know so much about it.
Martin Luther translated the Bible directly from Greek and Hebrew texts into German, being careful to use the correct German so nothing would accidentally get translated incorrectly. He would go into town and learn the everyday German being used to ensure he was translating correctly. In the process of translating the New Testament, he didn't trust the content of 4 books and he put them at the end. He really doubted the contents of Revelations so it is last.
Apparently, the bible of the time being used by the Catholic church had been re-written over the years and was not true to the old texts. Thus, why he wrote a new version.
That is not true. we have some of the oldest surviving texts of the bible
Codex Sinaiaticus and the Codex Vaticanus, 4th century AD.
they're pretty much the same bible that is today, no edits. We have fragments of the bible going back thousands of years.
Luther tried to edit the bible. He tried to cut James and Revelations out of the Bible. He tried to edit the words of the bible by saying that we are saved by "faith alone" when alone is no where in the text of the Bible.
not picking a fight, just speculating... i've been having a hard time accepting the fact that a global deepstate has controlled humanity for hundreds or thousands of years, yet somehow this global deepstate has not altered the bible????
surely the DS has altered parts of the bible, or completely fabricated it totally; Q's religious side leads me to believe the bible is not fabricated... but maybe that is Q's point....???
Protestants have altered the Bible, but the Catholic Church never altered the scriptures. This is a miracle in itself and proof that the Catholic Church is the one true Church Jesus founded that he promised would be protected by the Holy Spirit. 2000 years, with several bad popes, several kings trying to influence it, but the Church still never went back on any of its doctrines or altered the scripture. Compare that to the thousands of Protestant denominations, all contradicting themselves and believing whatever suits their personal lifestyles.
how do you know this? surely the cabal wrote the history books that taught you this?
Nice dodge attempt.
It was compiled at the end of the 4th century in a series of councils at Hippo, Carthage, and Rome, among them were presiding the Catholic Bishop of Hippo, Augustine. Pope Damasus of Rome gave his approval and the list of the Old and New Testament Books were definitively declared to be the Bible.
The Bible is a Catholic Book and it is our gift to the world.
Know your history.
It's the reverse. Paul chastised Peter for only congregating with the Jews. Paul took Peter down a peg and told him he had to treat Gentiles and Jews alike.
It is the key passage that indicates the Pope is not infallible at all times. We can criticize the Pope, seeing how Peter then changed his ways due to Paul's criticism.
The only reason the Church would be allowed to fall to corruption is if all the people who would speak against the corruption left to form their own religions instead of staying to fight.
Jesus left us a template for a Church. Whether or not you think it has authority is besides the point. He gave us a gift and we allowed it to get filthy and corrupt.
Archbiship Carlo Maria Viganò is my nomination for the new Pope.
Benedict was the last Pope chosen by devout Catholics. Francis was installed by the Central Banks. I agree that Benedict isn't allowed to die until Francis the imposter is done away with.
That's not to say Benedict isn't as filthy. Only that he went through the proper channels to get to his station. The hell that awaits both of them for what they have done is worse than any man could imagine if they don't Repent immediately.
For clarification, the Catechist (rule book) of the Church states the Pope is only infallible when he speaks on matters of morality while sitting upon the throne of the Church (wherever that happens to be, currently in front of the Tabernacle in the Sistine Chapel).
So even learned Catholics should know the Pope is full of it.