"In the USA one-hundred years ago, everybody who had food to eat expected rather good health, especially if they lived in small towns. The diseases we have today were rare. At that time, the greatest fears were freezing and starvation. Most other deaths occurred during cold seasons from gradual nightly carbon monoxide and tar poisons from burning wood or coal in fireplaces, wood stoves and ovens where houses, cottages or shacks were closed, poorly ventilated or non-ventilated. That created lung toxicity that caused frequent flu and other respiratory diseases. In major cities, many diseases and deaths were caused by the same indoor pollution plus smog from silversmiths and blacksmiths every few blocks. Rarely was there a sky-high smoke stack that pumped the smog high into the sky, diluting the toxic particles. Also, many factories, homes and buildings used coal-burning furnaces that vaporized mercury into the air. Heavy metal poisons were constantly in the air as they are today but they were held in concentrations in households and narrow streets. When animals are exposed to such air-pollution as coal dust and vaporized mercury, many develop pulmonary diseases like the Black Plague. Vessels for eating and drinking usually were made of poisonous metals, adding to the toxicity that caused diseases of the times. Factually, What Causes Diseases Today ? We are conditioned to believe that germs are the cause of most of our many diseases, that those “germs” are “pathogenic”. It is 99% myth, superstition and false. Animals exposed to all of nature’s microbes do not get diseases. We develop disease PDN #04, Part I Primal Diet Newsletters - Volume 1 (2006) 29 from accumulation of industrial pollution, including vaccines, medication, processed food and household compounds just as they did 100 years ago.(i) However, we have 60,000 more industrial chemicals than we had 100 years ago. Animals in the wild constantly expose themselves to microbes. They lick their and each other's feces and “germs”, including strangers, and never get diseases. The superstitions that we are fed daily by the pharmaceutical, medical and opportunistic bacteria-phobic industries through academia and media, especially television, would lead us to believe that nature is inherently designed to harm and kill us. Academia believes, and indoctrinates us to believe, that most anything from academia and science, even though ideas, laws and formulas change, is truth and the only rational reality. Academia teaches us that science and business are most important but teach us nothing about ourselves and our health. Academia teaches us to revere and accept everything that medicine says is right."
Comments (38)
sorted by:
Germ theory is just a theory that got traction. This spawned the vaccine industry. If we were to seriously assess this and other theories with a purely scientific mind rather than a profit-driven agenda we might actually improve the health of mankind.
This book provides an interesting view on the Black Plague:
https://www.amazon.ca/New-Light-Black-Death-Connection/dp/0752435981/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=baillie+%22black+death%22&qid=1615654202&sr=8-1
Thank you very much
10/10 experts agree with whatever will make them the most money.
There's not a scintilla of evidence that there was a great "rat die-off" during this period. Rats and their parasites hopping over to humans is the mainstream explanation. Pure nonsense.
Rats aren't the cause of squalor, garbage dumps, toxic environments. People are. Rats arrive on the scene to clean up the mess.
One interesting theory for the "black plague" is that there were quite a few comets/meteors seen during the height of that period, which led to highly unusual and destructive volcanic and earthquake activity, which thus then released poisonous gasses into the air.
No "germ" has even been demonstrated to cause death in 1-4 hours with excessive bleeding from the nose and mouth, like was documented in that period. A poisonous, putrid, toxic air supply makes a lot more sense to me. Sounds a lot l like the effects of mustard gas. Volcanoes kick out enormous amounts of sulfuric gas that would cause exactly what was described.
Food for thought anyway...
Absolutely. The "Plague" affected people in Iceland, which did not have a rat population, nor was it part of any serious oversea trade routes, so rats coming to Iceland via ships is not a valid explanation. People affected described the air as being "corrupted". That's enough for me. I think our suspect is a comet or meteor. Also, the planet's oil and coal does not come (exclusively) from dinosaur bones and vegetation. Do the math on how much plant matter and skeletal remains would be required to generate coal seams tens of feet thick. An explanation that works is once again, comets. Their tails can contain hydrocarbons and passing through the tail would produce black rain, possibly flaming. Fire and Brimstone? I think the bible is not so much a book of silly myths.
Agreed! Comets, earthquakes, volcanic eruption activity that was unusually high for the years surrounding the "black plague". Makes a lot more sense than rats and their jumping cooties every day of the week!
As to "fossil fuels", agreed again. I first heard this notion from Fletcher Prouty. There's a good video out there of him explaining how this idea was first promulgated.
I first heard it from James McCanney. He does a weekly podcast where he discusses a variety of topics, often with some fresh new perspective on things we've been misled about. Plate tectonics? Pffft!
Bingo!
Thanks for the high quality posts.
Thanks for the paragraphs. They made reading that much easier.
Mad cuz mad
I find this line of thinking interesting but isn't something I've looked into as of yet. What is your opinion on the likelihood of accepted germ theory being wrong, and who do you consider good voices on the topic.
See Dr. Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan's work, leading the charge. Cowan also wrote "The Contagion Myth" book last year. My favorite book however, is "Bechamp or Pasteur" by Ethel Hume which was first published in 1923. It shows definitively, with loads of stats and evidence, that the germ theory was soundly debunked on every front by those outside the "medical establishment". You name it; rabies, anthrax, typhus, typhoid fever, dysentery, tetanus, whooping cough, etc. (the "diseases" of those times) - all shown to be pure nonsense. They demonstrate clearly that these "diseases" were caused by poor sanitation, bad hygiene, toxic environments, polluted drinking water, squalor, war-time psychological disorders, and of course "vaccinations" which introduce toxins into the bloodstream.
Humans still become afflicted with all those so-called "diseases", they've just been renamed over the decades, i.e. pneumonia, bronchitis, flu, hepatitis, MERS, SARS, covid-1984, etc.. One of the many "tricks of the trade".
There's nothing new under the sun.
The alternative to the "germ theory" is the long-standing "Terrain Fact". An unhealthy terrain (body/tissues/organs/blood) leads to the HEALING process we have been indoctrinated into calling "disease" and taking big pharma "medicine" in order to stall and arrest said "healing process", causing more damage down the road as we age.
Wow. Pretty interesting. I think I need to get myself read up on this Terrain Fact idea. It's sad that these con artists lie to us across so many industries. Economics is where I've put a lot of focus, Just lie after lie.
check this out https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prwCMLg49yY
Its kind of a hit piece cuz they dont let him answer any of the experts questions but they cant really hide the truth that everything weve been told is a lie since this man did everything the wrong way supposedly and cured himself of incurable illnesses (supposedly incurable)
Holy shit that is sickening. lol. But I don't immediately dismiss it. But damn! Gross! Interesting though. Would you/have you ever tried that??
No thankfully Im not sick enough to need that if I had cancer etc yes I would in golf ball sized amounts as he recomends because I would be desperate. Goatis on youtube does it hes eaten 1 year old fermented raw chicken and said it tasted spicy. he didnt seem to really find it that disgusting but since we are conditioned for flavor and texture I can imagine it would make me gag I dont have the best stomach. Even after years of eating and chewing raw chicken it can still make me gag sometimes its a psychological thing.
Crazy. I mean I can see why eating it raw would be healthier though. Anything is healthier before you cook it from my understanding. The longer you cook vegetables the more nutrition you are cooking out of them, etc. The argument makes sense to me. It is interesting to imagine if eating "cooked food" itself is propaganda. I wish we had an honest "expert class" who was actually investigating this kind of stuff!
Yup it really makes sense so its crazy to see people eat supplements and expect to gain health from them when theyare not biop available at all since heat or chemically extracted. Kodak literally sold film development fluid as vitamins supplement since they didnt want to pay to dispose of it and found it was actually 89% similar to vitamin E. Most people are not aware that they did studies hundred years ago or more with cooked, processed and frozen foods and they all took animals 5x longer to heal wounds than raw so those at the top know the truth I have no doubt they know viruses are not contagious.
It applies to all our major institutions. We live in an inverted reality. The full economic, medical and law coup was finalized in 1933 during our "bankruptcy" filed by FDR on his first day in office. The medical and legal take-over was finalized in 1938. All "educational material" you read after these dates is suspect, which is why I prefer the pre-1930 materials. Once the financial system was hijacked, only those people and organizations who supported the inversion were supported, financed, upheld, lauded in the media, etc. Those opposed to the dominant narrative were de-licensed, smeared, careers destroyed and unable to acquire money for research. See the stories of Royal Rife, Wilhelm Reich and Gaston Naessans for evidence of this in the medical arena.
Enjoy your research!
have you seen this Law Doc? https://miepbos.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/email-prik-2019.pdf
Don't like to click on downloadable .pdfs.
Can you paste pertinent content?
here ya go https://newagora.ca/interview-with-a-retired-vaccine-researcher/
Yep, I've seen this before. Recent confirmation of what the REAL HERO of medical research knew and proved back in the 1860 - 1890 period - Antoine Bechamp. It's not even fair to call him "Pasteur's rival". Pasteur was a fame-seeker and fraud extraordinaire. "Bechamp vs Pasteur", circa 1923, is essentially providing identical findings to this interview.
Just as you find rats at garbage dumps, you find "bacteria" in the presence of decaying/diseased/dying tissue. Both are opportunistic "scavengers" whose job it is to clean up the mess. Read Dr. Stefan Lanka's "The Virus Misconception" for a cogent explanation on this topic.
I usually link this to people to explain viruses, its easy to listen to an digest https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odj1IwJA8Cs
I've seen this guy's work before too, the "solvent" idea. I prefer Lanka's assessment that these "tiny dead things" are just the particulates of dead/decayed tissue/cells.
Dr. Kaufman proposed the "exosome" idea which is another interesting theory.
Solvent? Exosome? Cellular particulates?
Lot's of theories. I'm an Occam's razor kind of guy. I opt for Dr. Lanka, as he's a trained virologist.
Far more illuminating is; Bechamp's "Microzyma", Enderleins "Protid", Reich's "Bion", Naessans "Somatid" discoveries. All one and the same "thing" they saw. The Pleimorphism/Polymorphism model of "bacteria" changing forms depending on the mess that needs to be cleaned-up. Whatever you call "it", it would appear that all life arises from and eventually returns to these fundamental units of life (more fundamental than the "cell" - the actual "builders" of cells). Bechamp explains it best and most accurately IMHO.
Aajonus Vondeprlanitz. His bibliography including the newsletters is basically all we need to reverse all disease he was killed before he started researching herb remedies thoroughly which would improve and even possibly provide more healing potential treatments with natural methods that are health giving. The likelihood of bacteria being the cause of disease is unlikely given 90-99% of the body is bacteria. They isolate stuff like ecoli and blame that for people being sick but they fail to realize that ecoli is actually part of digestion. Viruses are healthy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odj1IwJA8Cs, antibiotics are pure poison along with 99.99% of medicine since the human body is 90-99% bacteria so as he says 99% of the time do the opposite of what medical experts recommend and you will be ok. He says viruses are actually necessary once all the bacteria that digests is compromised so the idea that they are dangerous is totally insane because its actually leading to more deaths and illness since those who accumulate toxins cannot be rid of them as their digestive potential is reduced.
This is very good work fren. Hand washing is still a thing, no? Because I don’t think we want to have our shit on our hands while we eat.
I wash my hands George Carlin style
Vonderplantiz recommends eating bovine poop if you have really bad incurable cancers brain tumors etc since that actually shrinks them
Not that I’m gonna eat cow shit soon, but if I’m extremely desperate.......
Well that’s easy to find, I raise cows ?
NIce!! I will have cows soon as well. BASED!!!!