-
When you read or watch anything that makes you very emotional, STOP and Ask yourself "Who would want me to get me all charged up?". The answer to that question help you regulate your emotion and focus on the real problem.
-
When you find yourself angry at or hating a certain group of people, no matter who they are (Transgender, White, Black, Gay, Feminists, whatever be the group) STOP and Tell yourself "These conflicts and anger between people is an illusion. I am not angry at these people. I am angry at the people manipulating these groups".
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Good tips.
When I get emotional, I stop and tell myself -
‘DEHUMANIZE YOURSELF AND RETURN TO HAMSTER’
Works Every. Single. Time.
Thats a great one!
On a serious note, there is nothing wrong with being emotional in various parts of you life, just not when its triggered by the Globalists.
There it is.
lol, you're the first person who's made me look up new words in a long time. an egregore of liberty/American Dream is highly preferable to being locked in on Trump only, of course, and if there hadn't been people dedicated to the great experiment of the USA then the world would have had no chance at all. the USA has been corrupted a long time, but they had to do it with many layers of lies, and now that it all is being pulled back, the liberty-minded can regroup and lead the world again. new awakening.
luche, loosh? egregoré? why are all these "spiritual energy" vampire terms french-ish? they do like to complicate matters with extra language, I find it an odd way of saying demons.
I like to tell people: Use and tune up your God-given antennas, common sense and gut instinct.
Gut instinct is very important. Unfortuantely a lot of people are being taught that they should only follow "facts" and "logic" exclusively and suppress your gut instincts because usually your gut instinct is "politically incorrect".
Correct! We need to rewind to a time when our choices and beliefs were not driven by forms of media but by life experiences and instincts.
But what responsibility do those have that eat up the bullshit propaganda and strike out due to self-pity? The propaganda is just an excuse to fulfill the evil already in their black hearts. These hateful idiots are equally culpable.
I'm all for wholly adopting the approach of individualism. Every person is responsible for their own personal actions and attitudes - no family, racial, sexual, ethnic, etc. baggage or some fictional "ancient guilt" or "guilt by association".
But I have nothing but enmity for those that don't. Self-pity, especially when combined with collectivism is the absolute CORE of evil.
Feeling sorry for yourself, followed by the desire to blame others for your state of being, is the very recipe for lowest trash in humanity. It makes you capable of every evil action you can imagine.
I see the transhumanism agenda and I get pretty upset.
Most people think our emotions are illogical. They are not. Our emotions are logical.
An emotion is our body's mechanism for matching up a stimulus we experience, and compare or contrast that stimulus to our values.
If I say somebody died, you might have a slight negative emotion. But since you don't know who it is, you don't have much of an emotion.
If I said it was someone you loved or greatly admired, you would have a very negative emotion.
But if I said it was someone you despised, you would have a very different, likely a positive, emotion.
It is the same stimulous -- hearing or reading that someone died.
But YOUR PERSONAL VALUES about who that person was, and what THAT means to YOU, will determine YOUR EMOTIONAL RESPONSE.
Stimulous >> check against YOUR VALUES >> results in an emotion.
Once you understand this, it becomes fairly easy to deal with bad emotions. We like good emotions, so nobody really wants those to go away, although they always do fade away. But for negative emotions, it is helpful to have a means to deal with them.
So, anytime you feel a very negative emotion, STOP. Identify what that emotion is (anger, sorrow, helplessness, etc.). Then, identify what the stimulus was that caused the emotional reaction (this could be something you saw, something you read, something you heard, something you smell, something you taste or touch, or it can simply be a thought you created within your own brain -- any of these can be the stimulus that results in an emotion).
Once you know what the stimulous was, and what the end result emotion was, all you need to do is identify what VALUE you hold dear that caused that stimulus to result in that emotion.
Once you do that, you can evaluate if the value you hold is valid/helpful to you, and if not, change it. If it is valid/helpful, then you can decide if the emotional rection is valid/helpful. If yes, figure out how to deal with it. If no, get over it.
This is a very insightful post. I have actually been thinking of creating a whole blog post dedicated to what emotions are, how they work and why they are important and how it ties with instincts. Also how we all have two brains - emotional and logical and how they both need to be in harmony to be able to live happily.
The example you gave ( a person dying) is very apt. My personal favourite is killing an animal. But it works the same way. So many small details to factor in rather than just saying GOOD or BAD or SAD or HAPPY. This kind of calculation is a math of its own, and its called fuzzy logic.
Infact emotions are the fuzzy logic equivalent of our logical mind, and they can perform amazingly complex calculation in a split second and tell you what you should do based on all your values, your experiences and individual differences in various factors affecting the current situation.
Instincts are nothing but the outcome of this emotional brain performing complex fuzzy logic that takes into account so many things that we cannot consciously even be aware of them. That is why it is important to trust your instinct. It might get things wrong sometimes, but that failure becomes part of the learning data and next time the instinct will be even more finely tuned. The more you trust your instinct the more finely tuned it will be.
I would say that values is one part of emotions. Our emotional brain is unable to communicate verbally. Emotions are the language of the emotional brain. Values are one part of the equation. An equally important part is your insecurities. Emotional brain tries to protect your innermost person ("ego"). Insecurities are perceived as threats to our ego and hence trigger strong emotions. This is why I can ask you a innocdent question but end up making you angry, because it might have touched close to an insecurity.
The ultimate way to handle emotions is to learn mindfulness. Minfulness is a means to communicate with our emotional brain by simply observing out thoughts and feelings without judgement, and querying what is the cause of these thougts, and unraveling the thread. Eventually you will uncover your hidden insecurities, many of them caused by childhood issues (issues can be very simple things like you were unable to gain approval of your parents as a child). When you work on resolving these issues you will lose your insecurities and then your emotions become pure reflections of your values under conflict.
I do not agree, at least not completely.
I remember a time (not too long ago) when there was no such term as "transgender." The term did NOT exist. It has been made up in the past few years.
Before that term existed, there were "transvestites" and "transexuals." A transvestite was a male who dressed up like a woman. We thought those guys were pretty funny. Some were damn convincing. There was even a profession created around them, called "drag queens" (still exists, but this is how it started).
The "transexual" was the male who had his organ cut off to "become" female. Nobody (and I mean NOBODY) actually believed he was a female. Everybody undestood this was a male who was seriously delusioned.
Also back then, the term "gender" was never used -- or if it was, it was hardly ever used. There was no such thing as "select your gender" on a government form. It was "select your sex -- male or female."
The concept of "gender" is also a new term. It is a "fuzzy concept" and designed that way, on purpose. It means that the term has no REAL meaning. If a word or term can mean whatever you or someone else wants it to mean, then it means NOTHING.
Words define concepts that we hold in our brain. We use these words to convey information to others. We BOTH have to be thinking of the same concept when we use a word, in order for there to be clear communication. This is why we ofte disagree on things, not so much because of the concept, but because we are both using the same word but to mean somewhat different concepts.
Since "gender" and even "transgender" have no commonly-agreed definition, they have NO MEANING. This is why they are fuzzy concepts.
ANYBODY who thinks he or she is the "wrong gender" or even the "wrong sex" has a serious psychological delusion, and NOBODY should enable that deslusion.
If we should be emotional/angry at anyone, it should be directed at those individuals who insist that fuzzy concept terms are real, and that delsusional people should be coddled and we should all pretend they are normally functioning people. They are not.
Either the Emperor is naked, or he is not.
It is one OR the other. Not both.
Oh, I don't disagree that transgender is a made up fuzzy concept. Infact if you dig into the science of it you will see the scientific corruption started even in 60s in this instance and the whole research is a whitewash. Anyone disagreeing got disgraced, kicked out. Any negative studies were buried. The concept of Gender separate from Sex was created by a guy (forget his name) who sounded to me like a psychopath.
I will extend it one more level. There is no such thing as racism. There is racial prejudice that every single person in this world has to a certain extent and it is formed by our own experiences with different races. But racism was created by the Democrats. If you look up the history of KKK its fascinating. The only racism is the one created and practiced by democrats and it had nothing to do with race. It was purely for votes.
The point is, these people (BLM, even Antifa, transgendered people, etc) are as much victims of these hoaxes as we are, except their victimisation involves them being abusers as well. Dont get me wrong. Each of these need to be punished for every crime they committed. But in the end, hating these people who themselves are victims and weak-minded people is not going to help us because the Globalists count on exactly that sentiment. The real anger must be directed towards the evil people orchestrating this in the shadows. And this includes academics and scientists who use their power of their positions to further this hoax. These folks need to be treated the same way we would treat the criminal masterminds.
love the sinner hate the sin?
That phrase is an attempt to shame those that know what the Bible says. We have forgotten the true definition of the word hate and for that matter the definition of love. God defines both and this phrase is part of brain washing. Study love and hate in Gods word and you will see it plainly
it always sounded piss poor and wishy washy to me.