Again, just another WTF moment. Nothing conclusive, but just WTF! Did you catch this yourself, fren? If so, sharp eye!

Because it definitely looks really weird. Those giant microphones, which would only would look so large because they are closer to the camera, somehow end up under and almost inside Biden's hand towards his body, but amazingly never seem to actually actually contact his body or his hand. (and also, increase their apparent size from the trick of forced perspective.)

I had to scrub back and forth in the clip to find the brief bit you screenshot (screenshotted? screenshat??), but when I did, man, just WTF.

Now of course it could easily just be yet another in a thousand inexplicable AV glitches, with a plausible if unsatisfying explanation, that have characterized the less than 2 months that this doddering senile creep has ostensibly been office. But to my eyes, it not only looks faked, it looks badly faked.

But even more interestingly, in not only looks badly faked, it looks like they've again gone way out of their way to make it looked badly faked. The easiest thing would have been just to have a bunch of microphones there, in the frame - even if it was a staged scene or whatever, it'd look convincing.

Alternatively, you could composite these microphones on top of the video of Biden/Bidan and make it look decent... although there might be transparency issues with that deadcat.

But what it, for all the world, looks like, is that they masked his hand over the two microphones, which you'd never choose to do because a) it's a pain in the neck to mask moving video, and not trivial to do this convincingly, b) it accomplishes the exact opposite of what you'd be trying to recreate here. So what would be the purpose?

And my answer, as its been repeatedly before is: it really, really looks like all these little glitches are intentionally introduced to make it clear someone is fckin' with him; that someone else is in charge of this show.

Now I (and the OP) could be wrong here, on this or any isolated instance. On any isolated instance, you could easily say "Hey, that's a ridiculous explanation. Occam's Razor suggest it's just a video glitch or a compression artifact or an optical illusion or whatever." But there's been dozens of these. And so Occam's Razor now unequivocally points to the opposite conclusion.

Folks, there's NO WAY this isn't a movie (or something very much not what it seems), and a VERY weird movie at that.