GREEN SCREEN DEBUNKED (For the last time hopefully...)
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (66)
sorted by:
No people think it should be in front of his hand. I'm saying it's not.
This clip is the best quality one Ive found showing both angles synced up.
https://streamable.com/4m5xli
Notice how far away the light grey mic is on 1st clip. Then watch his hand go in front of the mic on the 2nd clip.
This screengrab from the vid makes it so clear even a blind man could see it. The light grey "dead cat" mic cannot be directly behind bidens hand, and at the same time be several feet off to the left side.
https://files.catbox.moe/cxpkke.jpg
That clip on top seals it.
I sent OP the pic. The dead cat is in front of Quid Pro Joe. Don't let your brain get infected with leftism with their silly debunks. https://twitter.com/AngelaFergie75/status/1372385504126136322?s=20
Tell me why would they go to such lengths to fake multiple video's and pictures and get EVERY FUCKING ONE OF THEM WRONG??? Because they're not wrong, you don't know WTF you're talking about.
Because patriots are in control and they want to make it obvious that you are watching a movie. Stop finding excuses for MSM, these are weak debunks.
I can't quite put my finger on it but the whole thing looks so odd. Like the microphone are big so they appear closer to the lens, but then Biden walks right up to them and it seems like they are in the wrong place, it feels out of place. I think this is the problem with trying to analyze it because, it is our instincts that really take in what reality is supposed to look like. When we try to analyze it intellectually it just muddies it
Uncanny valley, they use the term when referencing bad cgi all the time. Our brains just know something is off, all the elements are there, but its just not right.
I was convinced this was fake at first. However, with these shots I am not so sure. Just like with the inauguration, where we had multiple layers looking focused on by the cameras, it causes things to not look right. Looking at the angles in these pictures though, I think there is nothing wrong with them.
If I take out what I expect to see with the naked eye, and then think of it like when I'm looking through my wife's super expensive camera, I think this is what I would see.
For instance, in the top picture (red arrow) the first pic shows it clearly behind and to the left. The second pic looks like its in front and to the left. This can be explained by the multiple focus effect in 2D.
The bottom picture (blue arrow) the first pic looks like it has moved up a little bit from the top pics. The second blue arrow pic looks pretty much exactly what you would expect from such a movement if the top pic was in fact behind, and not in front as the focus effect makes it seem.
There is no such thing as "multiple focus effect" in 2D/3D/5D.
Watch the synced up video clip I provided. Scrub the video back and forth to see the dead cat existing in 2 different places at the same time.
I wont bother going into the other errors in the video.. such as mismatched sharpness/contrast, floating feet, and an obvious 'halo effect' around biden which is an artifact leftover from the digital green screen/rotoscoping process. https://www.videomaker.com/forum/topic/having-trouble-with-green-screen-setup-and-haloglow
The human eye focuses on a single point in space. More specifically, it focuses on a specific distance. Its depth of field is very small. A good camera can have a much larger depth of field because it can restrict certain light rays from passing through the lens (aperture control). This is what I called a "multiple focus effect in 2D" for the sake of brevity.
Indeed, this is exactly what has caused confusion in several of these "fake" videos (the inauguration e.g.). I think that is what is causing the issue here as well.
Please do, because in the "higher res" videos (as opposed to a couple very low res versions I saw) I am not seeing that. Please point these effects out to me (where they are, timestamp, etc.).