A post like that is just going to get the people to agree out of spite and trolling.
I'm sure it was buried in a thread concerning some woman in a position of power who is abusing her position to do significant damage to the freedoms and liberties of people in this country.
You aren't going to get people defending that statement in a thread like that.
It doesn't mean everyone here hates women, or thinks women should have no leadership positions, it just means some woman in a leadership position did something so shitty that nobody would bother downvoting something disparaging towards her or women like her.
Whatever, ladies. "Placing" anyone "in positions of leadership" is wrong. What is right is allowing leaders to emerge, female or not. It was likely upvoted because it is correct, it's a statement of support for merit based emergence, rather than forced favoritism. This is something of a crux right here.
A post like that is just going to get the people to agree out of spite and trolling.
I'm sure it was buried in a thread concerning some woman in a position of power who is abusing her position to do significant damage to the freedoms and liberties of people in this country.
You aren't going to get people defending that statement in a thread like that.
It doesn't mean everyone here hates women, or thinks women should have no leadership positions, it just means some woman in a leadership position did something so shitty that nobody would bother downvoting something disparaging towards her or women like her.
Whatever, ladies. "Placing" anyone "in positions of leadership" is wrong. What is right is allowing leaders to emerge, female or not. It was likely upvoted because it is correct, it's a statement of support for merit based emergence, rather than forced favoritism. This is something of a crux right here.