You should learn to think differently. Dont ask people to prove a negative. Ask people to prove a positive.
Ask people to show you the research that shows the effects of covid infection on people who were vaccinated.
You will find that those research do not exist. The reason they do not exist is because when they conducted animal experiments, they found that vaccinated animals, when infected, developed cytokine storm and died.
So, basically ask whoevere you are arguing with to show you that the vaccine was tested to ensure it does indeed stop covid.
There has been a ruling of this by a judge, as part of FDA approval process, but I just cant seem to dig up the sauce. Would be a powerful redpill when necessary.
I think they might have a problem with the 4th condition of issuing a EUA when so many safe alternatives were on the market already. Class action against the FDA in the future maybe?
The purpose of a 'vaccine' is to prevent/protect from the disease. Post vaccination, the person vaccinsted cannot get the disease.
The purpose of an experimental drug using mRNA is ??? I don't know. The reason why it may be possible to become reinfected is because the experimental drug using mRNA technology is NOT a true vaccine. It alters or has the potentisl to alter RNA/DNA- you know, THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE.
*Ask your friend this question; 'Are you willing to BET YOUR WHOLE LIFE on an experimental drug not tested and approved by the FDA or anybody else, having over 2,000 Deaths in the USA alone, that at some point in the future could alter your RNA/DNA to cause other diseases and premature DEATH, for a virus that has a 97.7% survival rate?
The information is all over the internet. Look it up.
These are older ones I’ve isolated. There are newer versions on the list but haven’t had the time to organize.
Dec 11 2020:
"Could people still be infectious after they're vaccinated for COVID-19?"
Dec 29 2020:
"ER nurse tests positive for COVID-19 eight days AFTER he was vaccinated"
https://archive.vn/F62zg"Dr Christian Ramers said: It's not unexpected at all. If you work through the numbers, this is exactly what we'd expect to happen if someone was exposed."
(conclusion: Catch covid after first dose. You just need your second dose Or, no vaccine is 100% effective...Or maybe his side effects presented 6 days after vaccination? And he was sick for many days.)
Jan 26 2021
"Merck Scraps Vaccine, Says Better To Catch COVID Virus & Recover"
https://archive.is/IIFcD
To be fair, it's not exactly like Google will put these sorts of stories to the top of the search results.
One way to get around this is to know which websites are trustworthy and search they previous posts. But that'll leave you with some blindspots, as there might be good one-off articles elsewhere.
You should learn to think differently. Dont ask people to prove a negative. Ask people to prove a positive.
Ask people to show you the research that shows the effects of covid infection on people who were vaccinated.
You will find that those research do not exist. The reason they do not exist is because when they conducted animal experiments, they found that vaccinated animals, when infected, developed cytokine storm and died.
So, basically ask whoevere you are arguing with to show you that the vaccine was tested to ensure it does indeed stop covid.
There is a good explanation of this: https://humansarefree.com/2021/01/dr-david-martin-on-experimental-mrna-technology-this-is-not-a-vaccine-it-is-a-medical-device.html
If you search "mRNA is not a vaccine" to get lot of info that explains this
Good advice, and remember it's not a vaccine if it doesn't stop you from contracting the illness or passing it on.
There has been a ruling of this by a judge, as part of FDA approval process, but I just cant seem to dig up the sauce. Would be a powerful redpill when necessary.
I think they might have a problem with the 4th condition of issuing a EUA when so many safe alternatives were on the market already. Class action against the FDA in the future maybe?
"Before the FDA can issue a EUA (Emergency Use Authorization), it must conclude the following requirements are met: #4 There are no adequate, approved, and available alternative to the product under consideration for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition."(http://healthlawblog.dickinson-wright.com/2021/03/fda-authorization-of-covid-vaccines-what-does-it-mean/)
Thats why they lead a crusade against HCQ and Ivermectin. I am sure it will call come to light one day. But many will suffer before that.
The purpose of a 'vaccine' is to prevent/protect from the disease. Post vaccination, the person vaccinsted cannot get the disease. The purpose of an experimental drug using mRNA is ??? I don't know. The reason why it may be possible to become reinfected is because the experimental drug using mRNA technology is NOT a true vaccine. It alters or has the potentisl to alter RNA/DNA- you know, THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE. *Ask your friend this question; 'Are you willing to BET YOUR WHOLE LIFE on an experimental drug not tested and approved by the FDA or anybody else, having over 2,000 Deaths in the USA alone, that at some point in the future could alter your RNA/DNA to cause other diseases and premature DEATH, for a virus that has a 97.7% survival rate? The information is all over the internet. Look it up.
Outbreak at nursing home after vaccinations: https://greatawakening.win/p/12i3ucbAXR/new-there-has-been-a-covid19-out/c/
The information you seek is here, though you must hunt for it. https://files.catbox.moe/yteqjs.pdf
These are older ones I’ve isolated. There are newer versions on the list but haven’t had the time to organize. Dec 11 2020: "Could people still be infectious after they're vaccinated for COVID-19?"
https://archive.vn/jgL4F (answer: who knows, we don't test for that)
Dec 29 2020: "ER nurse tests positive for COVID-19 eight days AFTER he was vaccinated" https://archive.vn/F62zg "Dr Christian Ramers said: It's not unexpected at all. If you work through the numbers, this is exactly what we'd expect to happen if someone was exposed." (conclusion: Catch covid after first dose. You just need your second dose Or, no vaccine is 100% effective...Or maybe his side effects presented 6 days after vaccination? And he was sick for many days.)
Jan 26 2021 "Merck Scraps Vaccine, Says Better To Catch COVID Virus & Recover" https://archive.is/IIFcD
Jan 29 2021 "JNJ Shares Tumble After Reporting Vaccine Effectiveness" https://archive.vn/A7FE7
Jan 30, 2021 "Vaccinated Congressman Tests Positive for COVID-19" https://archive.is/bgFZ8
They should watch the below video and article.
https://principia-scientific.com/evidence-builds-against-bill-gates-for-crimes-against-humanity/
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/covid-19-vaccines-are-weapons-of-mass-destruction-and-could-wipe-out-the-human-race_GcjtJu9dY1RcSNh.html
Going right into "Bill Gates is evil" from being a pro-Covid19-vaxer is probably a large leap to make. Baby steps.
A single recent example:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12i3zEjO5B/woman-tests-positive-for-covid19/c/
Does the OP not know how to search the Internet for information themselves? How pathetic is that?
To be fair, it's not exactly like Google will put these sorts of stories to the top of the search results.
One way to get around this is to know which websites are trustworthy and search they previous posts. But that'll leave you with some blindspots, as there might be good one-off articles elsewhere.
https://files.catbox.moe/9rbtxh.pdf