Either this is bs, or we’ve got some real irresponsible/incompetent people in these departments. After all who’d let a child use there work equipment especially in secret squirrel areas?
These are all comms Fren. Think logically. If Starcomm makes the most stupidest excuse to explain that tweet as an accident, it means it is NOT an accident. Clearly they cant come outright and say "Yes, it was not an accident. We were sending a coded message to the smart Q folks/"
Now we should go back to analyzing "Q ACQUITTED" because it was clearly their intended message.
And some even thought it was a signal to political conspiracists.
Well there is the shoutout to Q, gotta get that dig in.
In a world where nuke generals have antifa terrorists as children (certainly no way the general could be blackmailed, compromised or influenced at all leveraging such a relation with a notorious criminal figure, no way!), seeing 'children' posting on a stratcom twitter is small fry.
If a child can gain access to their Twitter, Do we really want them in-charge of nuclear Arsenal. Dumbass Normies will believe this ridiculousness
Either this is bs, or we’ve got some real irresponsible/incompetent people in these departments. After all who’d let a child use there work equipment especially in secret squirrel areas?
This is definitely BS, which means the original tweet was definitely not an accident!
Yep which means we have to start decoding "Q ACQUITTED" in earnest
You can argue that the 4th definition can also be used as "Q proven to be true" - as in, the end is near.
Since when do children know cryptography and how to use ciphers...yeah not buying this
So isn't this child a white supremacist domestic terrorist Qanon-cult follower?
This looks more like a cat stepping on the keyboard than a child. Look at the grouping.
Bring on the cat turd tweet.
They're taking us all for idiots with that excuse.
These are all comms Fren. Think logically. If Starcomm makes the most stupidest excuse to explain that tweet as an accident, it means it is NOT an accident. Clearly they cant come outright and say "Yes, it was not an accident. We were sending a coded message to the smart Q folks/"
Now we should go back to analyzing "Q ACQUITTED" because it was clearly their intended message.
BULL. They’re talking about the MOAB. Somebody is doing a little saber rattling. Waiting on GO MODE. Godspeed. Hold the Line.
People have faced a court Marshall for less.
Dont forget they made this tweet as well https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-01/us-strategic-command-apologises-for-tweet-about-dropping-bombs/10677554
Next time:
His 14 years-old son accidentially tweeted: "Now, we'll fire a broadside ... YOLO!"
I thought the hash matched up somewhere within Q?
Sources told The Daily Dot........ The Daily Dot. Ok
Well there is the shoutout to Q, gotta get that dig in.
In a world where nuke generals have antifa terrorists as children (certainly no way the general could be blackmailed, compromised or influenced at all leveraging such a relation with a notorious criminal figure, no way!), seeing 'children' posting on a stratcom twitter is small fry.
https://defiantamerica.com/john-sullivan-goes-on-live-stream-interview-and-admits-that-his-father-is-the-retired-usaf-general-who-got-caught-with-loose-nukes/
If you plug this tweet into a cryptogram solver at Ruskin.com/tools/cipher/cryptogram-solver.pop
The top solution is “Q ACQUITED”
Post 2187 ?