According to Mr Kent Dunn, "Covid-19 vaccine, second shot, may NOT be able to recover from this, even in Med-Bed technology. The second shot, a common reaction is stroke or heart problems."
That data is 100% accurate. These are bioweapons that irrevocably alters every strand of DNA in the body.
Please disseminate:
There is some very fascinating new evidence coming out that is starting to question the old narrative of the DNA->mRNA->protein pathway being only one way. The textbooks say that. The creators of these "vaccines" want you to believe that. They tell us that there is no way the mRNA they introduce can possibly destabilize DNA. And yet, papers such as the following:
https://phys.org/news/2020-01-rna-effect-dna.html
Indicate there are some types of RNA that while being transcribed from DNA can alter the DNA structure in the cells. We are continuously told this is impossible by this "vaccine". We are told that they are merely coding for spike proteins and then being flushed.
But how can we be certain that none of them are somehow migrating back into the cell nucleus and possibly participating in some kind of dance with other RNA strands that can affect DNA? Nobody knows the human body well enough to guarantee that.
Just way too much is still unknown about this experimental gene therapy. I really worry for the people who are blindly trusting these demonic psycopaths pushing this technology. Until I know more I will never ingest this substance into my body. Lock me up if you want, but I am not taking this.
All that said, it is clearly hyperbole to say it alters "every strand of DNA in the body". That is basically "never in the age of the universe" possible. Some cells will always escape even a near perfectly engineered weapon. So nobody is served well with that message because it is so easily refuted by the deep state. It makes us all look like nut jobs.
But I believe it may be possible that it can have some adverse reactions on the DNA in some cells of some people. And that already should be enough to scare people and prohibit its use.
I think it’s fascinating that you NEED a followup shot? There’s NO WAY, you would THINK, that you’d want to mix a Pfizer with a Moderna...right? So you get Part 1, then you get Part 2. I have yet to see ANY discussion about this. Yeah, no data, no data. But...wtf? They’re each similar, yet different?!! I don’t need to be a biochemist to say NOT.
First, that is not what they say, nor is it what I say, nor it is what any other cell biologist says. What we all say is that cytosolic mRNA (messenger RNA the type in the vaccines) cannot alter your DNA. This is a 100% true statement (within the scope of any meaningful discussion). OTHER types of RNA can write to DNA, albeit under very specific conditions which have nothing to do with the vaccine.
Second, this article (and indeed most papers you will find on RNA/DNA interaction) is talking about a specific modification to a specific type of RNA that INTERACTS with DNA in a REGULATORY CAPACITY. That has absolutely nothing to do with altering the genome, but strictly related to regulation of protein expression.
We can be certain because we have done experiments on it. Thousands of experiments. Maybe millions. Is it POSSIBLE for the viral mRNA to interfere with normal DNA traslation, or even be written to the DNA according to these millions of experiments?
Yes.
Is it likely?
You are probably more likely to get hit by lightning 20 times before finishing this sentence with a cloudless sky than you are for even one of your cells to have the vaccine mRNA get written to your DNA.
I really wish people who are completely clueless about biology would move on to relevant vaccine topics. Its like playing Whack O' Mole.
There are plethoric numbers of vaccinated people who have had vaccine titers proving that there was NO antibody response to the "vaccine."
Ergo, the introduction of viral RNA did not occur. Big pharma admitted that their mRNA was derived from a foreign source which is unique among vaccine preparations. Exactly, what is the end goal if it is definitively not to stimulate an immune response?
Recommend that you troll elsewhere as we are highly educated individuals that WILL NOT be dissuaded with your specious claims.
What?
Nothing you are saying has anything to do with what I said.
Please give me an example where this has anything to do with anything I said.
Stimulating an immune response is absolutely the goal of these vaccines. If they are not doing it, that is a failing of their intent. How does that have anything to do with anything I said?
People believe that these vaccines are intended to alter our genome. This is disinformation that has been commonly used to spread fear. If our job is not to help those believing disinformation, then what is the entire point of Q?
As for "highly educated" I have yet to encounter another cell biologist or bio-nanotechnology researcher (what I am) on these boards. When I do, then I will finally get some help stopping this disinformation campaign.
If you think I am making "specious claims" please provide a specific grievance and I will provide evidence for any claim I make.
Hi Slyver, I appreciate your insight here.
What is your take on the potential long term affects of synthetic mRNA being injected into the body?
Is this not a large scale experiment?
Do you believe that the mRNA injection + “variants” and “vaccine passports” are part of the globalist control plan, and the “precipice of destruction?”
I fully concur. Vax manufacturers admitted that their mRNA is from a "foreign" source. The c@bal has been experimenting and producing chimeric abominations for decades. The key was for them to find an animal source that the immunological system would not immediately attack. Obviously, this is an overly simplistic statement but, you get the gist of it. As you know, mRNA is designed to "open" the DNA strand, combine and replicate. That is its primary job, so to speak. Ergo, if the organism survives long enough, it will change the entire genome to something less than human. ☠☠