Construction of the pyramids by slaves is a debatable topic to me. People have assumptions but when those assumptions are tested they've never succeeded that along with the precision of construction makes it pretty impossible that they were done with a bunch of people rolling stones on logs and other such nonsense. I dont have an answer to how they were formed I just find the standard story to sound like more false history bullshit.
As to the resurrection of our Lord.. that definitely happened. As to the slaves they for sure existed too.
I just don't buy that man power with nothing but bullshit chisels and logs formed those. ?♂️
well Graham Hancock makes a great argument that it could not have been built by extra terrestrials if that's where you're going ... his point is the mathematical encoding in the pyramids is apparent in their dimensions and orientation, but unprecise. Unprecise = terrestrial human. The work of space travelers would be characterized by precision, which is how they hypothetically could have travelled space and hit their target (earth).
I posted about a week ago on this. I would wager Napoleon and his troops built the pyramids. All through history, even through the Renaissance when there was a targeted rebirth of ancient techniques and knowledge, there was no mention of the great pyramids, no inspiration from them, no copying, no great pieces of art referencing them.
But then Napoleon goes into Egypt to ‘record’ and ‘survey’ the pyramids and unbury the Sphinx and then from that moment onwards the age of mummies begins, Howard Carter finds King Tut’s Tomb and the pyramids become one of the main inspirations of the Romantic Age that followed.
I'm talking about Greek art and sculpture being developed from Ancient Egyptian art, and yet they never used or referenced pyramids in their own art/sculpture. And then in the Gothic, Renaissance, Neo-Classical etc. there is no reference to or amazement of the Great Pyramid. As if it never existed. For instance, it was supposedly the largest structure in the world for thousands of years, yet nobody tried to refine or develop the shape, building it better and higher using less stone as they did with churches, arches, domes, towers, etc.
I'd wager the early pyramids like the Saqqara step-pyramid or the Naqada step-pyramid are the real Egyptian pyramids of antiquity. It wouldn't even surprise me if Napoleon was influenced by pyramids in the New World. I think it's safe to say pyramids in Mexico or South America were not copied from Egypt. Plus those pyramids are step-pyramids, as are generally all pyramids built elsewhere around the world. Only the great Egyptian pyramids perfected the smooth sides and the mystical 'super precise cutting techniques that could only be done by aliens,' and the 'moving thousands of stones without even having developed the wheel,' techniques etc.
Construction of the pyramids by slaves is a debatable topic to me. People have assumptions but when those assumptions are tested they've never succeeded that along with the precision of construction makes it pretty impossible that they were done with a bunch of people rolling stones on logs and other such nonsense. I dont have an answer to how they were formed I just find the standard story to sound like more false history bullshit.
As to the resurrection of our Lord.. that definitely happened. As to the slaves they for sure existed too.
I just don't buy that man power with nothing but bullshit chisels and logs formed those. ?♂️
God bless and happy Easter.
well Graham Hancock makes a great argument that it could not have been built by extra terrestrials if that's where you're going ... his point is the mathematical encoding in the pyramids is apparent in their dimensions and orientation, but unprecise. Unprecise = terrestrial human. The work of space travelers would be characterized by precision, which is how they hypothetically could have travelled space and hit their target (earth).
Plus the cuts are well beyond the technology we are aware of existing at the time, and the blocks may have been poured.
Don’t assume it would be precise. They may understand this assumption would be made to conceal the truth.
I posted about a week ago on this. I would wager Napoleon and his troops built the pyramids. All through history, even through the Renaissance when there was a targeted rebirth of ancient techniques and knowledge, there was no mention of the great pyramids, no inspiration from them, no copying, no great pieces of art referencing them.
But then Napoleon goes into Egypt to ‘record’ and ‘survey’ the pyramids and unbury the Sphinx and then from that moment onwards the age of mummies begins, Howard Carter finds King Tut’s Tomb and the pyramids become one of the main inspirations of the Romantic Age that followed.
I'm talking about Greek art and sculpture being developed from Ancient Egyptian art, and yet they never used or referenced pyramids in their own art/sculpture. And then in the Gothic, Renaissance, Neo-Classical etc. there is no reference to or amazement of the Great Pyramid. As if it never existed. For instance, it was supposedly the largest structure in the world for thousands of years, yet nobody tried to refine or develop the shape, building it better and higher using less stone as they did with churches, arches, domes, towers, etc.
I'd wager the early pyramids like the Saqqara step-pyramid or the Naqada step-pyramid are the real Egyptian pyramids of antiquity. It wouldn't even surprise me if Napoleon was influenced by pyramids in the New World. I think it's safe to say pyramids in Mexico or South America were not copied from Egypt. Plus those pyramids are step-pyramids, as are generally all pyramids built elsewhere around the world. Only the great Egyptian pyramids perfected the smooth sides and the mystical 'super precise cutting techniques that could only be done by aliens,' and the 'moving thousands of stones without even having developed the wheel,' techniques etc.
Nephilim giants. Genesis 6:4 unlocks everything.
Thank you for a polite exchange.....if these D.U.M.B.s are shown somehow that I can accept it as truth, perhaps the same constructors?