GameStop => Game Over ?
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (33)
sorted by:
I didn't have enough space to post everything. There is a lot more to the Ross Perot and the Barnes and Noble connection. It's interesting that Gamestop as we know it appeared as 1999 became 2000. I think it's a weird coincidence that Game Stop is another way to say "Game Over".
The company has some strange connections. Who would have thought it'd cause so much pain for hedge funds? It's triggered a domino effect that keeps growing and is not going away. The Deep States keeps trying to neutralize the threat yet it spreads and spreads.
It's also a huge red-pill for the masses. It has encouraged tremendous independent discovery of the London banker fuckery, and the fraudulent system of the US economic and banking systems and the media. It also bypasses the political divide.
If it isn't part of the Patriot plan I'll eat my GME hat!
What a world.
Président Trump always talked about how curious it is that the hedge fund managers make extraordinary amounts of money. The « dual meaning » of Enjoy The Show has to include the AMC link as well as the Biden shit-show, In my opinion.
Pretty hard to follow this graphic, but i get the gist
Thanks! I've seen you post on my others and it's always good to hear from you. I'll have to work better on some of the graphics in the future. I'm glad you still got the idea of it. It was a lot of information so I had difficulty summing it up.
What I wanted to share was Gamestop's history. It's also a weird coincidence that GameStop has a name that can mean "Game Over". Q said in a post The Great Awakening = Game Over.
Who would have guess GameStop would shatter the Hedge Funds little game on the stock market? Deep State is trying to play down how deep the squeeze cut them, but Gamestop seems to have set of a domino effect that keeps growing. From what I've read just as the Deep State (and it's them) try to put out one fire, ten more pop up.
I mean this is a Q discussion forum. Q posts have never exactly been easy to read themselves. Hopefully you've still tried to read them.
Besides, what do you mean "What's the TLDR?" Isn't TLDR an acronym that means:
"Too Long, Didn't Read. Term used to explain something(Usually a post) that's too long, and they were too lazy to read. Hence the name."
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=TLDR
It's strange to complain about format. Isn't the content what should matter to you?
Translation "tell me what I'm supposed to think thanks, don't wanna break a sweat" i.e "I'm sitting in China trying to make .15 cents and don't want to bother with this so just set me up for my shilling for the night thanks.."
Getting close..?
Then do the sensible thing and find a different post that is in a format you find "easy to read". Going and complaining about someone's posts for such a superficial reason is pointless.
What do you want? What does your complaining about my post accomplish? Do you want it deleted because you find it hard to read?
And it's pretty unfair you waving a finger about "format" when you posted this:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hkhrv5KV/so-how-deep-does-the-proverbial-/c/
That post is full of teeny-tiny text and is not an easy to read (or easy on the eyes). I don't even really understand how it's explaining The Great Awakening, but I am still glad you shared it. It's good to share ideas. Even though I don't understand it that post at all. I think it's good you shared that because there are many who would connect with its format and message.
I think it'd be silly for someone to go to your post and go "Ugh, I can't read this! This is a garbled jumble! What does it mean?"
It's just not possible to read some posts on a phone, so I save them for my large monitor.
No point in complaining. Just read the easy ones while sitting on porcelain.
I 100% agree. I'm just happy that so many work so hard to make sense of Q posts (which are 'effin hard to understand at time). Format is nice and some people are gifted at it. However, some of the most interesting posts I've read did not always have very easy to read formats. Great content, but a strain on the eyes.
My point is also that there is no point in complaining about a post because of its format.
I disagree, there's grounds to complain about format if it is indeed hard to read. As a smart and reasonable person, you should take that criticism and use it to improve your next post.
Instead you're getting defensive and butthurt about someone pointing out something they experience. It's what they're experiencing when they looked at your graphic. Stop crying about it and make it better.
I think the graphic is easy to read, but hard to understand. You're red highlighting doesn't really form connections that are apparent except Q talking about game and show relating to Gamestop and AMC. The other stuff doesn't connect, so be a big boy, take the criticism and improve your next post. Nothing else needs to be said.
Criticism is never about helping. It's about attacking and tearing down. A smart and reasonable person should the know the difference between criticism (what unhelpful people do) and a critique (what helpful people do). A smart and reasonable person knows when to stand their ground and defend their work. People who do criticism are weak and insecure. They aren't there to advise. They are there to tear down and be nasty. If their goal was helping they'd actually say what and how they thought something could be improved.
A critique involves actually reading and analyzing a work to see what it did right and what it did right.
Although "You're highlighting doesn't really form connections" is an actual critique that's fair, your attacks against are not. Why do you feel the need to add personal attacks? What did I do to you? You jumped into the situation and assumed I was the villain.
You could just said "You're red highlighting doesn't really" and left it at that. It could have given stuff to think about. Instead you add bizarre and unprovoked attacks because you want to pick a side (that game is long how the Deep State has controlled the sheep) without assessing the real situation.
Why? What was your goal? To upset me for analyzing Gamestop? You didn't like how I did it? The other commenter did not offer a critique. They criticisized. There is zero helpful feedback there, yet you side with them and resort to name calling rather than just honest feedback.
A truly smart and reasonable person would know better.
I like it. Thank you. I'd be very interested to see the extended Ross Perot details. I though him to be just well-meaning man who incidentally got Bill Clinton elected, but perhaps there is more to him?
Well, it's interesting because articles back in the day read:
"Real estate billionaire tycoon seeks to ride populist wave and challenge the system". (Perot)
Yet they used those same headlines for Trump. They have some weird similarities. Perot, however, was buried by the system where Trump overcame them.
u/lonewulf
Here it is! I found the post on it. This is how Barnes and Nobles connects with Gamestop.
What if the initial push on reddit was pushed by Q? I think it is very "Q" related. I think it with silver bring down the market for white hats to install NESARA
Aren't we here to talk about Q? This isn't TheDonald. This is a discussion of Q posts. A lot of Q content was not even about President Trump. It was about researching and finding connections to how the world really worked. I doubt you'd find most Q posts to be the "realistic stuff" (easy to digest) you are looking for.
"Realistic stuff" is usually the narrative the MSM spoon feeds the sheep. The kind of stuff that's easy to believe in because the MSM tells you it's true.
If you think Q is just a larp then why are you here? This is a post for analysis of Q posts. I'm not sure why you are making this about President Trump. I didn't even bring him up in this post. A lot of people here have been looking at Gamestop's connection to Q posts.
But it's interesting you chose my post HoeAndJoe as the first comment you've made on this forum in over a month. And the comment before that was 2 months ago. I guess it'll be a while before you comment again on Great Awakening.
Wow, wow. You jump fast here. Posting news articles about gamestop equates to "paranoid delusional"? If you can't handle the GME stuff, how are you going to handle 90% of the comments of this site? Will you run around to the people talking about Bidan being an actor and scream "This is nuts!" and then race over to the ones talking about Pedowood and Evergreen and scream "This is nuts!" as well. Like, why are you here? You clearly can't stand any discussion about Q and clearly think the Q stuff is 100% wrong.
"try not to waste time" Lol. You literally just wasted time ranting about my post over nothing? There was zero point in your comments. Why did you even read it if you're not interested in it?
If a post doesn't interest me, I do the smart thing and and I find one that does.
Is there anything about Q posts that you believe in? But I wonder what post you'll go after next month since you hardly post here at all. (And I suspect hardly read here at all).
So you you're fine with the fake Biden stuff and think that stuff is a million times more realistic. Which means you accept the idea Trump, Q and the military installed an entirely fake presidency and everything while they dismantle the Deep State. However, there is NO WAY in your mind it is possible that they would go after the ponzi scheme that are hedge funds. Wall Street is one giant ponzi scheme btw. That is just absurd to you because leaving the Deep State alive and well on Wall Street is cool. It just happened that suddenly redditors and Elon Musk struck like lightening and hit these hedge funds. But yeah... that's a coincidence. Just one big coincidence.
Also what articles did you read about the hedge funds that made a killing? I'd like to know the list of hedge funds that won big when the trading was halted.
Also I'd argue the squeeze was without question part of the "Plan" Q spoke of. For one thing, it wasn't about bankrupting the hedge funds, but about sunlight. The DS was forced into the sun (as Q posts long talked about). They had to openly cheat to stave off even bigger losses. Making them expose themselves and how they rig the system is the first step before the kill shot.
Mission: Exposure. Initiate short squeeze with GAMESTOP. DS panics. Resorts to cheating to stop the bleeding. Success. Sunlight.
Many people ask, "Why would the military and Trump allow the vaccines if they're dangerous? Won't people get hurt?"
Same line of thought, "Why would they risk hurting people by taking down the big banks and the ponzi-scheme hedge funds?"
You look at it as failure because in the end the Hedge Funds and Wall Street cheated and you think they got away with it. I'd say they didn't. They were forced out of the shadows. They had to openly cheat. That was the goal of the Squeeze.
As you said, of course crashing Wall Street would hurt many. But that is why you have to open the sheep's eyes first so they understand the truth and stop playing the game (Gamestop).
This attack was about sunlight, but it still started a chain reaction. Wall Street is trying to pretend everything is fine and that they didn't still lose big. Articles show the contrary. More and more are collapsing. That is not the sign of people "who made a killing". They lie a lot about their assets. The global economy is one giant ponzi-scheme that must be exposed.
Oh hello again, person who comments only every month. You say your laptop wasn't working, but now that it's fixed you only comment on my post. You come out of your absence and the first thing you do is to complain that a post on a Q discussion forum to complain that something is "nuts" because you don't like it and you don't agree with it. Weird.
(Biden has this election won, he just has no mental capacity so I believe they use actors occasionally.)
Lol, so the Deep State won in your mind. Yeah right you believe in Q. You in no way believe in Q anything. You're not here to discuss, but to blackpill.
You think they are using actors, but the actors are just a replacement for the real ones because... erm reasons? (You get angry at my evidence but then just pull that one out of nowhere). Because that's exactly what "I think they use actors does not mean the military or Trump is in control". That means you don't believe in any of the comms, the Q plan, or that Trump and the military had any plan. That means you literally think President Trump just shrugged and happily accepted a stolen election. That to me is nuts.
Why are you on a Q discussion forum if you clearly believe 100% the Deep State won and is now the one using an embarrassing Bidan actor who falls three times while walking upstairs? If the point was to cover up Bidan's weaknesses, why would the actor do nothing but highlight them. The Bidan actor humiliates the Deep States on a daily basis. But yeah sure, the patriots aren't in "charge. That some crazy logic there.
Doesn't that mean you think "Trust the plan" failed and we're all doomed? Which means you DO think Q is a larp because you believe the Deep State is in charge.
Why don't you posts the links to the list of hedge funds that you CLAIM gained money? Your claim was that several hedge funds got mega rich off the Gamestop squeeze. So post that list. It would help my research. I'm not sure which hedge funds you mean got so rich. Give the names and links. It would be helpful to making your case so I can read through what your claims are based on.
"if you think Q bringing Hedge funds to the light does anything helpful for you". That is a very misleading comment. The last part of your comment is pure blackpill and you reveal your real intentions.
"I'm sorry but even if they did lose money it makes no difference to your life or any American." Great way to give yourself away. I'm assuming you're not American after reading that. Your words are literally like "So what if they go to jail? Who cares?"
From all you wrote it's clear as day you don't believe in Q at all and are not here to discuss Q's post. In your view the Deep State is in charge and that's the message you want to spread here. Thanks for clearing that up. Now I know my post was over the target.