Does mRNA vaccine permanently alter DNA?
(childrenshealthdefense.org)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
There is no established biological pathway that allows for the mRNA strands of the type being injected to permanently alter the DNA of the subject. If someone has led you to believe otherwise, they are misinformed.
However, and I posted this several days ago, there is some interesting research coming out that seems to indicate it may be possible for certain types of RNA INSIDE the nucleus to alter DNA during transcription:
https://phys.org/news/2020-01-rna-effect-dna.html
We are continuously told this is impossible by this "vaccine". We are told that they are merely coding for spike proteins in the cytoplasm and then being flushed. And indeed, based on known medical science, that should be true. There shouldn't be any way for the mRNA to migrate back to the nucleus from the cell cytoplasm, and in any case it isn't the right kind of RNA to cause the effect above. So if our understanding of the human body is correct, then this can not permanently alter DNA.
But how can we really be certain that none of the mRNA strands are not somehow migrating back into the cell nucleus and possibly participating in some kind of dance with other RNA strands that can affect DNA? Nobody knows the human body well enough to guarantee that.
Just way too much is still unknown about this experimental gene therapy. I really worry for the people who are blindly trusting these demonic psychopaths pushing this technology. Until I know more I will never ingest this substance into my body. Lock me up if you want, but I am not taking this.
Biggest issue is how do we really know what's in the vaccines. If it really is just mRNA than no, it shouldn't permanently alter DNA, but we have only what they tell us in them.
THIS
Thanks. I will research it. Do you have a link to the paper?
Thanks. We actually discussed that paper in another thread on this site. Hasn't been peer reviewed yet, but I agree is definitely some intriguing research. Worth keeping a close eye on. I think it is clear that there is enough uncertainty in this technology that caution is in order.