BREAKING: During Chauvin Trial The Official Medical Examiner Confirms Floyd’s Heart Gave Out Due To Heart Disease, Hypertension, Drugs, And Stress (Videos)
(www.rightjournalism.com)
ℹ️ ⚔️ Information Warfare ⚔️ ℹ️
Why would he not go free? The medical examiner said Floyd did not die from asphyxiation. The police chief said that Chauvin had his knee on the shoulder blade. It had been confirmed Floyd was alive at the hospital. You can't have Chauvin guilty of murder or manslaughter when Floyd wasn't dead at the scene and the official cause of death is overdose.
I am saying that I think Chauvin is corrupt and that Floyd and Chauvin where the two least paid guys in a FF event for more riots.
Unlikely, bordering on ridiculous. There are between a dozen and 20 incidents a year where an unarmed black gets killed by cops during an arrest. They don't need to create these incidents. They happen organically. Floyd is a case where the media amplified an incident and used it to stir up the country. If Floyd hadn't happened they would have used the Rashard Brooks shooting or one of the other many shootings that happen every year.
No need for a false flag when reality provides plenty of similarly exploitable incidents.
Between a dozen and 20 a year amongst millions of interactions huh? Want to look up how many people die on an average weekend in Chicago? What those people don't matter because it is poc on poc crime? Why isn't anyone burning Chicago down to fix that travesty? So tire of the bullshit logical fallacies. THAT is ridiculous.
To the other point you are trying to distract from, there are supposedly photos of chauvin at other known false flag events.....I will see if I can find them.
“You can’t have Chauvin guilty of murder or manslaughter when Floyd wasn't dead at the scene....”
This part is irrelevant to murder. I’m not saying he did or didn’t but if someone hurts somebody and they die of those injuries or of complications due to those injuries that person can be charged or murder or manslaughter, whichever is appropriate with the set of facts...you do not have to die at the scene
He suffered no injury from Chauvin, and did not die from it. That matters.
Whether he did injure or didnt injure is what is being debated...if he did injure him that led to his death, it is irrelevant to the charge of murder if he died at the scene or later at the hospital
Reread the legal definitions of manslaughter from the evidence presented legally it doesn't fit.
Im an attorney, Ive probably re-read the definition of manslaughter more than is healthy. Not to mention you didnt even provide the definition under Minnesota’s statutes, which may vary. But its irrelevant to my only point is dying at the scene or dying later from the supposed injury that was caused at the scene doesnt effect the ability to be guilty of murder or manslaughter.
Do you do defence or prosecution?
And forgive my past experiences with people in your profession. They tend to be one sided liars with lack of respect for the law who make strawman argument or moot points.