I replied to another person so I'll paste it below with the same response.
I believe J&J produced a real vaccine unlike Pfizer and Moderna which are both mRNA. I am wondering if the cases where people got sick from J&J were spiked or tampered with to create news stories to get them banned. I think AstraZeneca may also be a real vaccine which makes me question again if they did the same thing to them so that more people take the mRNA instead of the real vaccine. For the record I am not advocating for anyone to take any of this trash
AZ is the most likely to cause clots out of all four. They can all cause these problems if they aren’t given far enough into your deltoid and wind up causing endothelial cells to express spike protein.
J&J uses the exact same mechanism as all of the other shots, but it is delivered inside of a different dead virus, instead of a tiny lipid casing. They all use this mRNA tech. None of them use the traditional vaccination method.
J&J creates the spike protein externally and when those cells dir they don't recreate that spike protein. The spike protein is temporary whereas the moderna and Pfizer permanently recreate that spike protein.
I have not heard this to be the case. The virus shell that the mRNA is transported in has no capability to produce proteins. In fact, no virus produces proteins on its own. Instead, what viruses do is inject their mRNA protein instructions into cells and trick cells into producing the proteins necessary to create more copies of the virus, allowing it to replicate.
This is also how the J&J shot works, as I understand it. The mRNA is delivered to your cells which then produce the spike protein.
Now, what I have heard is that the two shot “vaccines” had to make modifications to the mRNA structure to increase its durability, because of how fragile it is. This means that the mRNA, once inside a cell, will last for much longer than any ordinary mRNA either from the cell itself or a naturally occurring virus. This raises the chance of the mRNA being reinforced back into the cell DNA through reverse transcriptase, which would result in some cells having the coding for the spike protein in their DNA (which would be carried on when the cell divides, so in theory you could have spike proteins lingering in your body forever).
I am not 100% certain on this last part, I will need to do more research. But I am fairly confident in my assertion that even in the J&J, spike proteins are being created inside cells, the same as the other shots.
I replied to another person so I'll paste it below with the same response.
I believe J&J produced a real vaccine unlike Pfizer and Moderna which are both mRNA. I am wondering if the cases where people got sick from J&J were spiked or tampered with to create news stories to get them banned. I think AstraZeneca may also be a real vaccine which makes me question again if they did the same thing to them so that more people take the mRNA instead of the real vaccine. For the record I am not advocating for anyone to take any of this trash
AZ is the most likely to cause clots out of all four. They can all cause these problems if they aren’t given far enough into your deltoid and wind up causing endothelial cells to express spike protein.
J&J uses the exact same mechanism as all of the other shots, but it is delivered inside of a different dead virus, instead of a tiny lipid casing. They all use this mRNA tech. None of them use the traditional vaccination method.
Are the reports and articles deliberately lying? From what I've seen they're saying it's not classified as an mRNA.
J&J creates the spike protein externally and when those cells dir they don't recreate that spike protein. The spike protein is temporary whereas the moderna and Pfizer permanently recreate that spike protein.
I have not heard this to be the case. The virus shell that the mRNA is transported in has no capability to produce proteins. In fact, no virus produces proteins on its own. Instead, what viruses do is inject their mRNA protein instructions into cells and trick cells into producing the proteins necessary to create more copies of the virus, allowing it to replicate.
This is also how the J&J shot works, as I understand it. The mRNA is delivered to your cells which then produce the spike protein.
Now, what I have heard is that the two shot “vaccines” had to make modifications to the mRNA structure to increase its durability, because of how fragile it is. This means that the mRNA, once inside a cell, will last for much longer than any ordinary mRNA either from the cell itself or a naturally occurring virus. This raises the chance of the mRNA being reinforced back into the cell DNA through reverse transcriptase, which would result in some cells having the coding for the spike protein in their DNA (which would be carried on when the cell divides, so in theory you could have spike proteins lingering in your body forever).
I am not 100% certain on this last part, I will need to do more research. But I am fairly confident in my assertion that even in the J&J, spike proteins are being created inside cells, the same as the other shots.
Yes, that's what I read as well when I looked it up. Pfizer and Moderna use mRNA, but J&J takes the traditional approach and uses a dead virus.