When the number was apx 223K, the indictments were said to be 196K of them. If we're now at 249K, I suppose one might jump 196K up by the same ratio, so about 219K. Keep in mind that's number of indictments. Not all indictments are aimed at just one name. For all we know the number of PEOPLE under sealed indictment could be double or triple that number. We shall see!
When did General McInerney speak on the percentage of legal cases and the number of sealed indictments that supports the large percentages being discussed here? Can you cite the specific source?
Yeah, well you should probably stop that then. It contributes nothing. Q said to track these things and that's what we're doing. I suppose if it bothers you, you could just avoid threads that track this.
Q said to track legal cases on pacer? When? What drop number?
Q said to track legal cases on pacer and to engage in baseless conjecture on the number of sealed indictments as part of the overall number of legal cases? When? What drop number?
And, again, when did General McInerney mention the number of sealed indictments making up a huge portion of the legal cases number on pacer?
Sealed "cases", yes. Only a portion of those "cases" consist of indictments.
When the number was apx 223K, the indictments were said to be 196K of them. If we're now at 249K, I suppose one might jump 196K up by the same ratio, so about 219K. Keep in mind that's number of indictments. Not all indictments are aimed at just one name. For all we know the number of PEOPLE under sealed indictment could be double or triple that number. We shall see!
When the number was apx 223K, the indictments were said to be 196K
Who specifically said 196K of the 223K were sealed indictments?
As if they knew.
IIRC (it's been awhile) General McInerney. Got any evidence he's wrong? If so - go ahead and show it!
When did General McInerney speak on the percentage of legal cases and the number of sealed indictments that supports the large percentages being discussed here? Can you cite the specific source?
Which has already been discussed ad infinitum. But thanks for repeating. Again.
“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”
Yeah, well you should probably stop that then. It contributes nothing. Q said to track these things and that's what we're doing. I suppose if it bothers you, you could just avoid threads that track this.
Q said to track legal cases on pacer? When? What drop number?
Q said to track legal cases on pacer and to engage in baseless conjecture on the number of sealed indictments as part of the overall number of legal cases? When? What drop number?
And, again, when did General McInerney mention the number of sealed indictments making up a huge portion of the legal cases number on pacer?