1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are 15 posts that include "sealed indictments", including:

*HAVE YOU EVER WITNESSED 40-50K SEALED INDICTMENTS? NOT ALL FEDERAL/CRIMINAL. *

Pacer wasn't mentioned by Q, but was mentioned by an Anon who posted and discussed the Anthony Weiner indictment.

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q said to track legal cases on pacer? When? What drop number?

Q said to track legal cases on pacer and to engage in baseless conjecture on the number of sealed indictments as part of the overall number of legal cases? When? What drop number?

And, again, when did General McInerney mention the number of sealed indictments making up a huge portion of the legal cases number on pacer?

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Most people do not listen with the intent to understand; they listen with the intent to reply.”

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

When did General McInerney speak on the percentage of legal cases and the number of sealed indictments that supports the large percentages being discussed here? Can you cite the specific source?

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

When the number was apx 223K, the indictments were said to be 196K

Who specifically said 196K of the 223K were sealed indictments?

As if they knew.

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

If that is the biggest proof that you have, then you are in for one heck of a disappointment.

That VERY UNUSUAL huge number is just a number of "cases" and only a portion of that number of cases is made up by a number of sealed indictments.

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sealed "cases", yes. Only a portion of those "cases" consist of indictments.

0
pby1 0 points ago +1 / -1

What have they figured out, so far, as it relates to "the plan"?

17
pby1 17 points ago +18 / -1

He has been indicated. That is good news.

0
pby1 0 points ago +1 / -1

The forecasting and "decoding" related to the EG has been a never-ending source of disinfo. and inaccuracies.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
pby1 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are right: I won't.

I have no idea who they are, but can make a reasonable assumption that they have no inside information.

There is no actual documentation that can be cited as a credible source for the often rumored tunnel operations.

5
pby1 5 points ago +5 / -0

By whom?

There is no sauce related to this report or to on-going operations in tunnels.

11
pby1 11 points ago +11 / -0

Rush Limbaugh's passing.

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is Trump promoting the vaccines, if they are unnecessary?

Are they really safe, given the related deaths and injuries?

The approach is not novel, but does, perhaps, mimic an ostrich.

1
pby1 1 point ago +1 / -0

He isn't the one that said that he had a plan.

view more: Next ›