5,800 confirmed cases of COVID-19 among people who were fully vaccinated.
Of the cases — which the CDC refers to as "breakthrough infections" — 396 developed severe COVID-19 illness that required hospitalization and 74 people died.
1.3% of vaccinated people who caught Covid DIED.
6.8% had to be hospitalized.
The numbers aren't nearly that high for people that AREN'T vaccinated who catch Covid-19. What did the "vaccine" do to make these people more likely to die of the virus?
Without knowing many other variables, such as age or "comorbidities", diet or other immune issues, there is no way to come to that conclusion from this data.
On the contrary, since we don't know how many people were "protected" by the vaccine (from 0 to all), or how many were infected with SARS-cov-2 (from 0 to all) no conclusion can be made except that the death rate appears to be substantially below the previous vaccines where pathogenic priming caused severe reactions and death in around 5% of the vaccine recipients.
Since this data suggests it is substantially below that number even in the worst case, this is good news.
I believe your conclusions are not looking at the bigger picture.
If these numbers are accurate then this is actually good news.
If we assume that the vaccine provides some protection against the virus itself this suggests a fairly low mortality rate.
For example: if the virus provides immunity for 50% of the recipients (which is far below their in-house studies) then the mortality rate is only 0.6%. The demographics of that number is very important to come to any reasonable conclusions, but this number is not that much worse than the virus.
If we assume something closer to their actual estimates (90%) then the mortality rate is only 0.1%.
Is the vaccine more deadly than the virus itself? Unknown. Still a maybe.
Is the vaccine going to kill a sizable percentage of the population when they later encounter the real virus as was feared from previous coronavirus vaccines?
Maybe they ignored early symptoms, and maybe they're still not getting HCQ or Ivermectin as they're supposed to...... Feeling of invincibility since they got the shot. All those things, plus likely damage to their innate immune system.
Because they forgot to change the PCR “test” (which isn’t a test) cycles from 45 to 17, where it belongs. Covid is a scam of false positives to promote the Great Reset = globalism = communism.
... Or now the effectiveness of (Trumps) vaccine no longer fits the narrative, so they have to 'cease' and go back into lock down, until they develop "their" safe one.
Just thinking's all but... - 'we' might be being 'used' to amplify the (real) message they really want to get out?
Stop the dangerous rushed Trump vax, it'll either kill you or it doesn't work.
Back into lock down!
That's really NOT good.
5,800 confirmed cases of COVID-19 among people who were fully vaccinated.
Of the cases — which the CDC refers to as "breakthrough infections" — 396 developed severe COVID-19 illness that required hospitalization and 74 people died.
1.3% of vaccinated people who caught Covid DIED. 6.8% had to be hospitalized.
The numbers aren't nearly that high for people that AREN'T vaccinated who catch Covid-19. What did the "vaccine" do to make these people more likely to die of the virus?
Question: "What did the "vaccine" do to make these people more likely to die of the virus?”
Answer: Exactly what it was designed to do.
Boom
Without knowing many other variables, such as age or "comorbidities", diet or other immune issues, there is no way to come to that conclusion from this data.
On the contrary, since we don't know how many people were "protected" by the vaccine (from 0 to all), or how many were infected with SARS-cov-2 (from 0 to all) no conclusion can be made except that the death rate appears to be substantially below the previous vaccines where pathogenic priming caused severe reactions and death in around 5% of the vaccine recipients.
Since this data suggests it is substantially below that number even in the worst case, this is good news.
I believe your conclusions are not looking at the bigger picture.
If these numbers are accurate then this is actually good news.
If we assume that the vaccine provides some protection against the virus itself this suggests a fairly low mortality rate.
For example: if the virus provides immunity for 50% of the recipients (which is far below their in-house studies) then the mortality rate is only 0.6%. The demographics of that number is very important to come to any reasonable conclusions, but this number is not that much worse than the virus.
If we assume something closer to their actual estimates (90%) then the mortality rate is only 0.1%.
Is the vaccine more deadly than the virus itself? Unknown. Still a maybe.
Is the vaccine going to kill a sizable percentage of the population when they later encounter the real virus as was feared from previous coronavirus vaccines?
The data does not support that conclusion.
This has me hopeful. I was worried.
I hope these numbers are close to honest.
Maybe they ignored early symptoms, and maybe they're still not getting HCQ or Ivermectin as they're supposed to...... Feeling of invincibility since they got the shot. All those things, plus likely damage to their innate immune system.
Very Good question & Very Scary. The shot makes the virus more deadly when you get it.
Um, weren't there over 1000 vaccine-related deaths on record about a week ago. I think these case #s are being manipulated way down.
That’s because it is not a true vaccine .
174 million is not very likely, either.
Because they forgot to change the PCR “test” (which isn’t a test) cycles from 45 to 17, where it belongs. Covid is a scam of false positives to promote the Great Reset = globalism = communism.
"And you can't take a rapid antigen test — that can be falsely positive because you now have antibodies. You need to do the PCR test."
Haha. I think the inventor of the PCR test would disagree with them here. Too bad he's dead now.
... Or now the effectiveness of (Trumps) vaccine no longer fits the narrative, so they have to 'cease' and go back into lock down, until they develop "their" safe one. Just thinking's all but... - 'we' might be being 'used' to amplify the (real) message they really want to get out? Stop the dangerous rushed Trump vax, it'll either kill you or it doesn't work. Back into lock down!