Thanks for the link. I couldn’t find anything on how the council expects the police to do their jobs with these violent terrorists (I’m not going to pretend along with the marxists and call them protesters), but rather a laundry list of restrictions that basically tie the hands of law enforcement.
If we bear in mind that these leftists in government do not actually want the enforcement of laws, peaceful and fair society, resolution of major societal issues like poverty, jobs, crime and the like, the end of human suffering, then the picture becomes clearer. The leftists/marxists want the burning of cities, the death and injury of their own puppet terrorists and the police, widespread chaos and destruction, misery of the populace, decreased population and power for themselves.
Then they’ll take the spoils and go buy themselves million-dollar properties and tell their puppet acolytes who are too stupid to see through the scam that it’s for the good of the cause.
We’ll be praying for all the people of Minneapolis and other cities where the marxist-engineered riots flare up that everyone can come to their senses and wake up.
Non Lethal? Mk. Shields and billy clubs. Release the hounds. Lets see if they REALLY wanna engage with law enforcement or just larp in the park on the weekends. Pay per view. I'd buy that kind of entertainment. Antifa Smackdown.
Question from the back row - So, it is okay to shoot a rioter and looter? Follow up question please - Could you please point out in your city charter, state charter or Constitution where it says a City council has ANY authority because it seems you needed to look this up a year ago.
They want to terrify the cops into never wanting to use deadly force, and then take away all other options but deadly force and kill morale as badly as possible. This results in cops saying fuck it, let it burn.
They want to be able to burn down America at will. This is how they do it.
The Minneapolis City Council have made a non-binding resolution to oppose the use of tear gas, rubber bullets, and other "less lethal" weapons against protestors. These kind of weapons have been notoriously used within the last year to shoot the eyes out of journalists here in Minneapolis, among other horrifying abuses.
Police should put the city council on the front line of defense as soon as the riots begin. Then see what kind of weapons they would like to defend themselves
So.... they’re FOR the use of lethal weapons?
Or are they against all weapons and just want the police to ask the terrorists politely to not burn the city?
The military isn’t bound by that council, is it?
Thanks for the link. I couldn’t find anything on how the council expects the police to do their jobs with these violent terrorists (I’m not going to pretend along with the marxists and call them protesters), but rather a laundry list of restrictions that basically tie the hands of law enforcement.
If we bear in mind that these leftists in government do not actually want the enforcement of laws, peaceful and fair society, resolution of major societal issues like poverty, jobs, crime and the like, the end of human suffering, then the picture becomes clearer. The leftists/marxists want the burning of cities, the death and injury of their own puppet terrorists and the police, widespread chaos and destruction, misery of the populace, decreased population and power for themselves.
Then they’ll take the spoils and go buy themselves million-dollar properties and tell their puppet acolytes who are too stupid to see through the scam that it’s for the good of the cause.
We’ll be praying for all the people of Minneapolis and other cities where the marxist-engineered riots flare up that everyone can come to their senses and wake up.
Imagine BLM coming at the cops and they only have firearms, it's a blood bath in the making.
They need to get their civil war started somehow, I guess, because regular people haven’t taken their bait yet.
Non Lethal? Mk. Shields and billy clubs. Release the hounds. Lets see if they REALLY wanna engage with law enforcement or just larp in the park on the weekends. Pay per view. I'd buy that kind of entertainment. Antifa Smackdown.
Question from the back row - So, it is okay to shoot a rioter and looter? Follow up question please - Could you please point out in your city charter, state charter or Constitution where it says a City council has ANY authority because it seems you needed to look this up a year ago.
Perhaps they want a few deaths just to fuel their riots.
They want to terrify the cops into never wanting to use deadly force, and then take away all other options but deadly force and kill morale as badly as possible. This results in cops saying fuck it, let it burn.
They want to be able to burn down America at will. This is how they do it.
Let’s hope that any remaining patriots in Minneapolis get out now!
The Minneapolis City Council have made a non-binding resolution to oppose the use of tear gas, rubber bullets, and other "less lethal" weapons against protestors. These kind of weapons have been notoriously used within the last year to shoot the eyes out of journalists here in Minneapolis, among other horrifying abuses.
The council does not, of course, currently have the ability to actually ban the use of these weapons because--as everyone should know by now--the cops in Minneapolis are under the control of the mayor, not the city council, and Frey is a huge xxxxx who lets the police walk all over him and will never do anything to support meaningful police reform in Minneapolis. https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/file/2021-00473 https://lims.minneapolismn.gov/Download/RCA/17450/Less%20Lethal%20Weapons%20Resolution.pdf
People are retarded and the more power the more retarded they seem to be allowed to be
If it was a Patriot thing what do you think they'd vote for?
We all know we'd get the lethal force.
Police should put the city council on the front line of defense as soon as the riots begin. Then see what kind of weapons they would like to defend themselves