There's only ONE possible way Trump is reinstalled: 2/3rds of Congress would need to ratify an amendment that says the sitting, confirmed president can be removed if sufficient fraud is shown. The constitution tells us that after January 6th (when Congress confirms the electoral college votes that the states agreed upon) the President is inaugurated on Jan 20th. There's no extra caveat in the constitution that says this can be undone. - That's it. End of story.
The remedy for fraud must happen before January 6th, even if massive fraud is shown. OR 2/3 of Congress the courts, and likely SCOTUS change the constitution. There's no "next move" outlined in the constitution.
Don't believe me? If you think I'm wrong, comment below and let's talk again in two weeks when nothing comes from this audit.
That sounds nice and exciting and all, but the military follows the constitution, correct? Do you think a majority of the military will disobey their commander in chief, military generals and defy the rules in the constitution, all to rectify fraud? Or will they obey leadership and follow orders? I'm not exactly holding my breath for some huge military-driven takedown of the entire federal government
I hear you, but if heads don't roll this go round, what stops it? Some democrat is guaranteed four years as long as they can hide the fraud to inauguration?
Don't mean to sound defensive. Sorry if I came off that way. And I essentially finished explaining my position: How will fraud invalidate an already signed-off election and reinstall Trump as the rightful winner, when 2/3rds of Congress combined with a passive Supreme Court are, constitutionally speaking, the only vehicles of change? Fraud being discovered after an election only does one thing: It prosecutes the criminals involved. Is that the goal?
I remember In 2016 there was a pretty large voter fraud conspiracy in North Carolina and the dude(s) behind the scheme were arrested and convicted for forging fake votes. But absolutely nothing came of it because the election was already certified, so why do we expect something different?
Just wanted to say thanks for being the voice of reason. I agree with your analysis completely. Just one quick question, would the famed EO (whatever the fuck number) that addresses voter fraud play a role in removing or replacing Biden?
You hit the nail on the head. 100% correct. Nothing will come from this audit at all.
What concerns me is Cyber Ninjas has refused to reveal their methods, which will only act as further ammo from the media to dismiss the findings. If we don't even know how they reached a conclusion of fraud, the media will have a field day with that.
When we prove for all the world to see that AZ was a total fraud and *Biden is illegitimate what is the next move?
We take our country back peacefully.
Incoming downvotes
There's only ONE possible way Trump is reinstalled: 2/3rds of Congress would need to ratify an amendment that says the sitting, confirmed president can be removed if sufficient fraud is shown. The constitution tells us that after January 6th (when Congress confirms the electoral college votes that the states agreed upon) the President is inaugurated on Jan 20th. There's no extra caveat in the constitution that says this can be undone. - That's it. End of story.
The remedy for fraud must happen before January 6th, even if massive fraud is shown. OR 2/3 of Congress the courts, and likely SCOTUS change the constitution. There's no "next move" outlined in the constitution.
Don't believe me? If you think I'm wrong, comment below and let's talk again in two weeks when nothing comes from this audit.
That sounds nice and exciting and all, but the military follows the constitution, correct? Do you think a majority of the military will disobey their commander in chief, military generals and defy the rules in the constitution, all to rectify fraud? Or will they obey leadership and follow orders? I'm not exactly holding my breath for some huge military-driven takedown of the entire federal government
I hear you, but if heads don't roll this go round, what stops it? Some democrat is guaranteed four years as long as they can hide the fraud to inauguration?
Inviting downvotes and then getting defensive about your point before you're finished explaining it might not be the best tactic...
Read their other comments.... Why are they here me wonders.
Don't mean to sound defensive. Sorry if I came off that way. And I essentially finished explaining my position: How will fraud invalidate an already signed-off election and reinstall Trump as the rightful winner, when 2/3rds of Congress combined with a passive Supreme Court are, constitutionally speaking, the only vehicles of change? Fraud being discovered after an election only does one thing: It prosecutes the criminals involved. Is that the goal?
I remember In 2016 there was a pretty large voter fraud conspiracy in North Carolina and the dude(s) behind the scheme were arrested and convicted for forging fake votes. But absolutely nothing came of it because the election was already certified, so why do we expect something different?
People watch too much TV.
Just wanted to say thanks for being the voice of reason. I agree with your analysis completely. Just one quick question, would the famed EO (whatever the fuck number) that addresses voter fraud play a role in removing or replacing Biden?
Yes. It's one thing to show the fraud. Another thing entirely to act on it.
NH is preparing to audit. Maybe a few more states will. Then what?
We are in a position in which a number of fraudulently elected people will determine what's next.
You hit the nail on the head. 100% correct. Nothing will come from this audit at all.
What concerns me is Cyber Ninjas has refused to reveal their methods, which will only act as further ammo from the media to dismiss the findings. If we don't even know how they reached a conclusion of fraud, the media will have a field day with that.
It's going to come to us to take our government back from these thieves.