Trump usually doesnt announce something until it has already been done and completed. When he comes back I expect the military tribunals to mostly have already taken place, with the appropriate people already executed. Who knows how they will tell us, but probably bit by bit so the public isnt shocked. I think the military already knows the election results, the audits are just to prove it to the public.
I agree totally. But human beings since the beginning of our existence have always needed to see others die as punishment for doing maximum evil. It's in our DNA. The species must cull itself to survive.
"Nothing can stop what's coming" must necessarily include mass death for pedophiles and traitors and human traffickers and their politician partners. For starters. And the people need to know, and be able to see the dead bodies if they choose. An example needs to be made to put fear into pedos. Mass executions, for exampke.
These globalist assholes want depopulation. They won't mind if we start with them.
I wish someone could explain this blockchain election thing because as far as I can tell there is no fit for blockchain in elections. Seems to be thrown around because it sounds good.
Because blockchain has built in protections, it can't be tampered with, it can't be cheated. That's why there's as of today over $2 trillion dollars floating around in blockchains with no centralised system controlling it.
What? Blockchain is just the ledger. Cryptographically secure. That doesn't mean it secures elections. Election workers can still switch votes, throw votes away, generate fake ballots, etc.
Also, there's been huge theft of bitcoin on some of the exchanges. It's not a blockchain issue as far as I remember. I think someone was able to get access to people's private keys and once you have that then you have access to their coins.
It's just people that don't understand it or the capability of determined saboteurs that are pushing for this. It's well known in cyber security that security hinges not on advanced technologies or anti-virus, but the people operating the machinery itself. That's why security is so much more about designing network systems architecture with regards to users and their levels of access, I.E. don't give people permissions or accesses they don't need.
Elections need maximum possible transparency, not more layers of tech that will confuse 90%+ of the populace and make votes impossible to measure.
Engineering such an election system is a highly challenging task, to be sure. Security isn't about preventing ALL threats, however, it's about minimizing threat impact and size. A few lost ballots is a lot better than someone being able to change a few thousand with ease.
He also said he's strongly considering "TIMES TEN doing what everyone wants me to do" but when you ANNOUNCE early it has an effect on FUNDRAISING
NEEDED IMHO:
Martial law instituted yesterday until Jan. 20, 2025
Audit every single state's election - get the real numbers, prove it to the public once and for all so there is no question who won
Imprison/execute all the traitors and other criminals involved in stealing the electionS
Military-controlled elections in 2022 and 2024 using quantum blockchain technology impervious to attack
Trump president for four more years
Trump usually doesnt announce something until it has already been done and completed. When he comes back I expect the military tribunals to mostly have already taken place, with the appropriate people already executed. Who knows how they will tell us, but probably bit by bit so the public isnt shocked. I think the military already knows the election results, the audits are just to prove it to the public.
Everything you said works for me!!
I agree totally. But human beings since the beginning of our existence have always needed to see others die as punishment for doing maximum evil. It's in our DNA. The species must cull itself to survive.
"Nothing can stop what's coming" must necessarily include mass death for pedophiles and traitors and human traffickers and their politician partners. For starters. And the people need to know, and be able to see the dead bodies if they choose. An example needs to be made to put fear into pedos. Mass executions, for exampke.
These globalist assholes want depopulation. They won't mind if we start with them.
Wish I upvote your post 100+ times!
Me, too!! ?
Cheers x 100
I wish someone could explain this blockchain election thing because as far as I can tell there is no fit for blockchain in elections. Seems to be thrown around because it sounds good.
What was the time stamp for that quote? I listened and didn't hear that part
Because blockchain has built in protections, it can't be tampered with, it can't be cheated. That's why there's as of today over $2 trillion dollars floating around in blockchains with no centralised system controlling it.
What? Blockchain is just the ledger. Cryptographically secure. That doesn't mean it secures elections. Election workers can still switch votes, throw votes away, generate fake ballots, etc.
Also, there's been huge theft of bitcoin on some of the exchanges. It's not a blockchain issue as far as I remember. I think someone was able to get access to people's private keys and once you have that then you have access to their coins.
https://www.economist.com/sites/default/files/plymouth.pdf
It's just people that don't understand it or the capability of determined saboteurs that are pushing for this. It's well known in cyber security that security hinges not on advanced technologies or anti-virus, but the people operating the machinery itself. That's why security is so much more about designing network systems architecture with regards to users and their levels of access, I.E. don't give people permissions or accesses they don't need.
Elections need maximum possible transparency, not more layers of tech that will confuse 90%+ of the populace and make votes impossible to measure.
Engineering such an election system is a highly challenging task, to be sure. Security isn't about preventing ALL threats, however, it's about minimizing threat impact and size. A few lost ballots is a lot better than someone being able to change a few thousand with ease.