Maricopa Audit. All ballots need this watermark or they do not count.
(mobile.twitter.com)
Comments (40)
sorted by:
the ninjas said they are not looking for watermarks. so dunno..
this is a texas ballot obviously.
Man I thought I was the only one why looked right at the Texas sign and was like ummmmmmm
It doesn't take UV to see a watermark. The government does use micro fibers that glow under UV light - I am thinking that might be what they are looking for.
The short interview in this article may be illuminating.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/05/former-arizona-secretary-state-confirms-four-six-truckloads-voting-machines-handed-back-maricopa-county-yesterday/
According to a former Arizona Secretary of State and auditor they are looking for watermarks that are not supposed to be there. Arizona assures them the ballots "do not" have watermarks. More of a just in case. Ehh... who really knows until they release all the information.
I too am wondering why they stopped using the boxes.
Maybe they have found enough to put into a computer program and are detecting them by camera now.
This is bigger than most realize. The fallout from this could lead to a hot war with China. What they are uncovering in AZ is going to spark massive upheaval. Likely across the planet. Think about it. China owns Biden and msm. They're not going to relinquish control. No matter how massive the results will be in AZ and they will be massive... Read eo13848. This fraud is about to cost China everything. This isn't just an audit it's a prelude to war between the two most powerful nations in history. Understand this and you will understand the need for timing and secrecy.
So from what I understand they used the UV light for the mail in ballots. My guess is that the mail ins would be the fake ones. I don’t know if this is 100% accurate info but it’s from the audit telegram chat.
Here is the official link which then had multiple links for specific camera chat rooms. https://t.me/ArizonaAuditLiveFeeds
Thanks for the info. It's always a good thing to have more info than less, it's up to us to sort things out for ourselves.
Maybe they already scanned all of the ballots with UV? It looked like they could go through them pretty fast.
My guess is they can identify fraudulent ballots without that procedure. The UV inspection seemed like it was delaying the whole inspection process.
Seems this Twitter person doesn't know what he's talking about....
Anon : They were not looking at this with microscopes. Seems like a look here, not there tweet.
Every ballot seems to be checked with a unique looking camera while placed on the LED backlit pad prior to going back into the original box it came in. My guess is this the kinematic artifact and machine vs pen mark identifier.
Here is the official link for discussions of the process including rooms to observe and report bad actors https://t.me/ArizonaAuditLiveFeeds
This^
ALL large printing printers have the MIC (machine I'd code) SPECIFIC to the printer ...
So while other printers ALSO PRINT THEIR MIC it is a different watermark
UNLESS THEY ARE CHECKING FOR THE SPECIFIC MIC They are WASTING TIME with a quick backlight.
Cause this post is bullshit
White hats are in control.
That’s the other side of the ballot showing through the copy machine light in my opinion.
Hmmmm. Ok.
Watch the water(mark)!!!!
From what I have read, the UV lights were used to detect fingerprints to verify the ballot was handled by a human and not a machine.
And crease marks from being folded.
15D chess!
this is not it, because some of the people passing the ballots through the UV lights were not wearing gloves themselves.