Recounts just scanned in the ballots and recorded the result so if the original count included fraudulent ballots, then so did the recount - the audit examining each ballot for signs of being fake (no creases on mailed in ballots, machine filled in choice bubbles, things like that). I also believe that the audit will verify information for addresses since it has already been proven that lots of the mail-in ballots came from out of state voters, fake addresses, and non-residential addresses.

Everything that Red Pill said, plus the previous audits were performed by the very people accused of fraud. So, it was like - "Look, we think you committed election fraud and might need to go to prison. Be a sport and audit your work and confirm this fraud so we can go ahead and file charges against you." Then, the auditors came back and said, "Well, we just checked, and everything was perfect!"

I'm pretty sure the five people from SLI that spent five days at the Maricopa County Elections Board office couldn't have been as thorough as we have seen with our own eyes from 9 different camera angles this audit doing.

I posted about this awhile back. See link below.

https://greatawakening.win/p/12i3lBs2YD/maricopa-audit-on-my-mind/

u/EarnYourVote responded with this comment.

The two audits that Maricopa did were a joke. Not a single ballot was actually reviewed. They basically checked the source code of the machines were the vendors legit version, that there were no viruses on the machines, and that they had no internet connection (details a little foggy on that one).

One of the companies did do a scan check by scanning a known deck of simulated ballots and verified that the numbers matched. But there was no forensic audit of the machines, no check to see if audit logs were tampered with (as they were in Antrim County). There was no analysis of adjudication rates and some affidavits have said it was over 10% (when standards dictate that should be well under 1%).