The Ultimate red pill coming straight from Pfizer themselves
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (25)
sorted by:
Looking at the document this is a protocol. This is not evidence of an occurrence of "vaccine shedding".
Consider these facts:
All of the anecdotal evidence I have seen for off target effects of the vaccine have been related to the menstrual cycle. Evidence suggests these vaccines seem to have direct effects on the blood. The vaccine having primary target menstrual disruption, or excessive menstrual bleeding would not surprise me, and indeed there is good statistical data to support that.
Starting from that primary target effect, it would not surprise me that it would have off target effects as well. Why? Because menstrual sympathy is an incredibly common and well-known effect that has been going on for all human history. Such sympathy has been attributed to a pheromone response.
Pheromones can be very potent biological effectors. To assume it is NOT pheromones, but is instead "shedding" of some unknown piece of the vaccine is foolish. That doesn't mean we should dismiss the possibility, but to ignore the most likely case in favor of the less likely is completely irresponsible and generally done from fear, not reason, and definitely not science.
I do not see anything sinister here specifically. There most certainly is not evidence that it is happening as there is no data whatsoever.
If there is evidence that these things DID occur with the coronavirus vaccine in the experimental RESULTS then that would be evidence of it occurring. This, is not that.
so what your saying is. just like the audit we have to wait for the results. i mean if anything this picture just further proves its an experiment(some deny it as such) so i still think that this picture is good information to have
I am saying more than that, but also yes to everything you said.
This is an experiment that is not following their phase 1/2/3 protocol. It has no control group, data is not being collected on any of the reactions in a controlled manner. Death's and serious permanent adverse reactions are not being studied/autopsied in earnest. Its probably the worst experimental setup ever. Head will roll, or necks will be stretched over this (if we win the war), I guarantee it.
The more that I am saying though is, there are biological reason to think that this supposed "shedding" is not happening with the mRNA vaccines. That doesn't mean its not, and other evidence may come forth to support the idea, but as of now I have seen no good evidence to think this is happening, and a lot of evidence that supports the alternative I laid out above.
Hopefully time will tell. I really don't think this is something we have to worry about however. At the least the fears are not founded in the current evidence.
i hear you loud and clear. thank you for your input
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1166062
Patient received second dose of Pfizer vaccine on March 17, 2021 while at work. March 18, 2021 her 5 month old breastfed infant developed a rash and within 24 hours was inconsolable, refusing to eat, and developed a fever. Patient brought baby to local ER where assessments were performed, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes. Infant was hospitalized but continued to decline and passed away. Diagnosis of TTP. No known allergies. No new exposures aside from the mother''s vaccination the previous day.
Apr 22 2021: Video, "Nurse warns -- stay away from vaxxed people" https://www.bitchute.com/video/uNpRqMROrZQB/ Her web page with reports of bruising, allergic type reactions, women having unusual heavy bleeding with clotting, just from being in contact with the vaxxed -- http://www.truthunmasked.org/p/stay-away.html
April 22 2021: REPORT: Pfizer Vaccine Confirmed To Cause Neurodegenerative Diseases
https://nationalfile.com/report-pfizer-vaccine-confirmed-to-cause-neurodegenerative-diseases/
““In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients.” Prion-based diseases are, according to the CDC, a form of neurodegenerative diseases, meaning that the Pfizer vaccine is likely to cause long term damage and negative health effects with regards to the brain.” “This is especially concerning since the Pfizer vaccine is an mRNA vaccine, an untested type of vaccine which creates new proteins and can actually integrate into the human genome, according to a report from the National Library of Medicine. In other words, degenerative brain conditions may appear at any time in your life after receiving the vaccine.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/
In support of this hypothesis, we found chimeric transcripts consisting of viral fused to cellular sequences in published data sets of SARS-CoV-2 infected cultured cells and primary cells of patients, consistent with the transcription of viral sequences integrated into the genome
Dr. Carrie Madej: “I see so many wrong things with this vaccine and I see that we are not talking about it in the major media and I see that I feel that these companies are outright lying to us when they say they cannot affect our DNA – because, by all definitions that they are using – this can affect our DNA.” It can change our Humanity: https://www.bitchute.com/video/PMJxyCCQzLKP/
Below is a link to an interview of a German Microbiologist. https://www.brighteon.com/37c00ecc-0d8d-4654-92c9-9f06155f3c7d
Private school in miami not allowing Vaccinations of teachers. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3CaTtP07o00&feature=youtu.be
April 2 2021: France quarentens vaccinated https://archive.ph/DsrxQ Source if you can speak french: https://archive.ph/tvs7S
First case: the vaccine or some of its constituents being in breast milk the day after the shot would not surprise me, but that is NOT "shedding". Its not even close to the same idea.
Second case: all those anecdotes are easily attributed to menstrual sympathy from a pheromone response.
Third case: Please read my post about this.
Fourth case: Dr. Carrie Madej: She is incorrect, at least in scope. mRNA has basically zero chance to be written to DNA. The adenovirus vaccines have at least a chance, but even then its very unlikely, and if it did happen (in either case) the most likely scenario is that that cell would be killed by the immune system since that's the function of the vaccines. Thus no hypothetically altered DNA would be passed on.
Any talk about these vaccines altering our DNA in any meaningful way is not based on biology. Is it misinformation (a lack of understanding of cell and molecular biology) or disinformation (purposeful fear mongering).
I think it is the first in most cases I have seen. Cell biology is very complicated, and you don't learn it to sufficient degree to be discussing it in detail from a medical school or pre-med program. As a general rule, unless someone is a specialist that requires that information (oncologist e.g.) or is also a researcher (MD PhD) they are not likely to have sufficient understanding about the specifics of cell or molecular biology, so please take what they say with a grain of salt.
How about this one. Apr 19, 2021: “Shedding Woo,” Clif High talking about some reports of problems that women are experiencing, and the long-term implications, https://www.bitchute.com/video/VJ4A4yu0veDA/ Long term anecdotal evidence of shedding issues.
There are reports of men sleeping next to their vaccinated partner waking up covered in bruises and not from a rough night. What might explain that reaction?
I really don't want to watch that whole video. He does not sound credible to me (though that is my first reaction to some things he said that weren't quite right, that is not a fair overall assessment since I didn't watch the whole thing).
Regardless, I still haven't seen anything that can't be attributed to pheromones. Men waking up with bruises? Whatever. That's not even an "anecdote" that's just a statement. Maybe the vaccine is causing people to be violent sleepers. Who knows. Maybe pheromones can cause such a thing. Maybe these are specific to the adenovirus vaccines (which I still am unlikely to think are "shedding", since they don't replicate, but at least its not completely implausible). Maybe a million things. Pick one that has a basis in biology, not "spike protein shedding" which doesn't.
Oh, and evidence is better than speculation. I still haven't seen any evidence of anything other than menstrual sympathy.
I barely know first aid, so it is hard to make the argument.
I hope that this remains the case of some sympathetic / pheromonal response and in small enough samples to remain statistically insignificant. (I have seen one story of a lactating mother whose baby died when it was the father who received the vaccine)
My wife believes me paranoid that the vaccinated are going to start dropping like flies.
I have not seen this story, but I doubt the babies death is vaccine related. Nevertheless, a proper autopsy should be done.
The effect of pathogenic priming may cause a few deaths, but I don't think it will be as bad as some fear (or as bad as I feared). There was a report that came out that put the death rate at less than 1% (it was insufficient data to be conclusive but it was something). If true, while thats actually quite a few people, its not that bad on the scale of the entire population (I.e. it could be way worse).
I also think it's probably not worse than that 1% because if it were, we would likely already know.
Your concerns are well founded. https://greatawakening.win/p/12iNeD7OUy/x/c/4E0wRAjvN5V
That they knew this was even a possibility is very telling.
Not really. They probably publish this same protocol with every drug they test. I cannot imagine that they would not publish this because of legal reasons to cover their asses.
Since you say that they probably do, how about you show an example?
I said "probably." And I said I "can't imagine." Sorry, but I am not going to spend time searching for something to back up a claim I made based on common sense, and that I did not state, nor imply as being fact.
If you don't even KNOW, they why say it?
Because sometimes people overlook common sense perspectives when evaluating whether a claim is likely to be correct, or not. I simply offered a common sense based opinion on the information presented. People are encouraged to evaluate things they read on the internet however they wish.
The reason I challenged you to provide some evidential basis for your "probably" claim is that this board gets bombarded every day with posts that amount to "nothing to see here / move along".
More like a DREAD pill, this is disturbing!
How does the mRNA vaccine shed through the air if it is critical that it is stored at -70 F? It just seems like it would denature upon exposure to ambient air.
This is referring to exposure to the vaccine itself, for example if a vial breaks and the nurse gets it on her skin
Is it too tiny to read for anyone else?
open image in new tab if youre on phone, on computer you can click and drag the image to make it larger
Good find, despite what the trolls may say. The fact the medical cartel knows about shedding and they are still in testing saying it’s super safe IS RELEVANT!
Did the mother know before this happened that shedding was part of the testing documentation? Unlikely. Using the reasoning this is normal medical procedure as an excuse undermines trust in modern medicine even more for me.
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1166062 This incident 5 month old baby had to suffer platelet loss, severe internal bleeding and bruising before death.