WATCH: Rand Paul GRILLS Fauci Over China LIE — Our Govt. FUNDED Research That Led To COVID-19!
(en-volve.com)
? DEM PANIC ?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
For the plan to work, everything Trump and the military do has to be by the book. They have to give DS the opportunity to do the right thing. Otherwise it gives DS defensive leverage. Even at this stage. There is definitely more to all of this though.
I'm not entirely sure what you are referring to with "must be by the book" but NOT protesting the electoral vote is a perfectly legal action, no matter what the reason.
I don't believe he HAD to lose to be a part of a successful awakening, but they knew he would and planned accordingly.
You cannot bust anyone for treason if you told people to not stop the treason....He may have approached them with his damning evidence and let them decide. But I don't believe this works if you interfere with systems designed to stop the fraud. By the book.
And fyi, a person can be put to death(criminal) if they fail to do certain duties while in service to the nation. That is why they have you take an oath.
To be specific for Rand Paul lets look at a couple things he said when the electoral vote was in contest.
Here he is saying the States have the power and it is essential that they retain that power.
He is amplifying that statement of State's rights and giving direction on how to proceed. It just so happens to be exactly the direction we are currently proceeding.
I assert again, this was all part of the plan.
Thought we were talking about legal vs duty? Congress could have sent them back right? Why have them certify the states choices at the federal level at all? Heck, Trump is the President of the red states and Biden the blue if Congress had no power to help conduct a free and fair election for President right?
Which strawman is next? Ruby Freeman and kin caught ILEGALY invalidating an election in GA on video was a deep fake? Congress should have rejected this state on that video alone. Sent their envelope back asking for a full forensic audit. Duty.
To my original point. You can't legally tell someone not to do their sworn duty so you can catch someone else not doing their sworn duty.
Now, you can make deals with criminals in custody.....but then if they are now criminals, are they still elected officials with authority to conduct a certification?
There is no law that I am aware of that states abstaining from a vote is illegal, much less punishable by death.
To prove traitorous action would require OTHER actions than a mere abstention.
It may not be good, or moral by your or my standards, but its not illegal. That is an essential distinction that is fundamental to the Bill of Rights.
Abstaining is not interfering. One is inaction, one is action. Those are not the same thing in a legal sense, even though they both have the potential to promote a negative outcome.
I agree that sometimes inaction can be illegal, but I do not believe vote abstention is one of those inactions. If you wish to prove to me otherwise you would have to cite law.
You don't think all government officials involved in the election process have a duty to ensure a free and fair election? What do you call it when you intentionally fail at this duty? What if another country is involved (proven)?
No crimes to see here folks....