You notice the incendiary bombs dropped on the tunnels.
If all you wanted to do is to collapse a tunnel, an explosive is used but it wouldn't produce a huge fireball.
If you wanted to suck all the oxygen out of a tunnel complex, suffocating everyone inside the tunnel system by removing breathing air... then use incendiary bombs.
For every section of tunnel destroyed... there may be many more that are intact, but have dead Hamas militants that couldn't escape and had no ability to breathe.
Thanks for the history lesson but that doesn't give radical jewish settlers the right to evict people from their houses, who have lived there for decades.
There comes a time where in the interest of peace, a settlement needs to be made.
The position I took was that I am against terrorism.
I don't know why you're bringing Hitler into the conversation as it bears no relevance on recent events.
You believe Hamas started the trouble, others believe it was in response to Israeli aggression at the Al Aqsa mosque.
I wasn't there so I can only go on what's reported.
Personally I don't think either side is innocent but attacking a holy site is a red line and the Israelis knew it would spark a response.
I also do not condone the response from Hamas just as I didn't condone the IRA targeting civilians but I can understand their anger.
My "freedom fighter" comment was meant as a generic term and actually was in response to your comment about the IRA.
Read my comments without your obvious bias and you'll see I'm not making excuses for the actions of Hamas. I said I understand their anger.
I do not condone their actions of targeting civilians.
I served in the British army during the troubles in N. Ireland so don't lecture me on what an appropriate response is to kids throwing rocks.
As the force of superior strength, I would expect the Israeli forces to expect such actions and be equipped to handle it, whilst showing restraint and a proportionate response.
They performed an air to surface rouse on another location so that they could then attack people who were not in that location or preparing to fight their forces.
Either you believe their intel and assume all those underground were actually terrorists, or you question it and reason that they killed a bunch of people underground who may/may not have anything to do with the conflict.
I'm skeptical of everything
You notice the incendiary bombs dropped on the tunnels.
If all you wanted to do is to collapse a tunnel, an explosive is used but it wouldn't produce a huge fireball.
If you wanted to suck all the oxygen out of a tunnel complex, suffocating everyone inside the tunnel system by removing breathing air... then use incendiary bombs.
For every section of tunnel destroyed... there may be many more that are intact, but have dead Hamas militants that couldn't escape and had no ability to breathe.
Perfect example of why disinfo is necessary
No Snack Bar for you!
Slow clap Good strat if true. Get all the baddies into a confined space then suddenly increase the air pressure... by a lot.
The recent videos of missiles hitting buildings were clearly controlled demolition.
Wondering if Hamas are not the ones being tricked here.
I'm absolutely against terrorism but I can't condone Israel's actions as they provoked this in the first place.
How would you react if for example 'settlers' came from the Dem run cities and evicted you from your home with the Govt's backing?
Then attacked you in your church?
Sorry but that just ain't right.
I'm talking about events in recent weeks which have reignited tensions.
If the US occupied Mexican land and treated the Mexicans the same way Israel treat the Palestinians, I wouldn't think that was right either.
You can't stop these endless wars without looking at things from both sides.
This may help understand what I'm referring to. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoVTss_3TMk
Thanks for the history lesson but that doesn't give radical jewish settlers the right to evict people from their houses, who have lived there for decades.
There comes a time where in the interest of peace, a settlement needs to be made.
So... Texas...
Did you support the IRA bombing innocent people?
I don't support anyone bombing innocent people, be that freedom fighters or military.
You didn't take that position in the first example you used.
The fact of the matter is the Arab world helped support Hitler in his campaign against the Jews.
As a penalty for their crimes, they had to endure the forceful retaking of land once known as Israel.
There had just started to be peace and Hamas fires rockets.
Israel bombing them back is not unjustified.
Careful, stating that Hilter actually killed jews is dangerous on this site.
The position I took was that I am against terrorism.
I don't know why you're bringing Hitler into the conversation as it bears no relevance on recent events.
You believe Hamas started the trouble, others believe it was in response to Israeli aggression at the Al Aqsa mosque. I wasn't there so I can only go on what's reported.
Personally I don't think either side is innocent but attacking a holy site is a red line and the Israelis knew it would spark a response.
I also do not condone the response from Hamas just as I didn't condone the IRA targeting civilians but I can understand their anger.
Bullshit.
You called Hamas "freedom fighters".
You excuse their actions by claiming they are fighting for "freedom".
But the only "freedom" they are interested in is the destruction of Israel.
Palestinians can't throw rocks at police and not expect a response.
This is not America dealing with BLM.
My "freedom fighter" comment was meant as a generic term and actually was in response to your comment about the IRA.
Read my comments without your obvious bias and you'll see I'm not making excuses for the actions of Hamas. I said I understand their anger.
I do not condone their actions of targeting civilians.
I served in the British army during the troubles in N. Ireland so don't lecture me on what an appropriate response is to kids throwing rocks.
As the force of superior strength, I would expect the Israeli forces to expect such actions and be equipped to handle it, whilst showing restraint and a proportionate response.
We're they fucking "kids" throwing rocks?
No.
Once again your bullshit shows through.
Mark Levin said these were houses / land stolen a long time ago and the current occupants were squatters. Israel was just taking them back.
How far back in history does that rule apply?
Would that rule then apply for Native Americans too?
At some point concessions need to be made and agreements put in place to ensure peace.
Seems sketchy tbh.
They performed an air to surface rouse on another location so that they could then attack people who were not in that location or preparing to fight their forces.
Either you believe their intel and assume all those underground were actually terrorists, or you question it and reason that they killed a bunch of people underground who may/may not have anything to do with the conflict.