Sorry for not linking the article but yeah I'm not gonna link it. Trust me. I almost got eye cancer from reading most of it...
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (121)
sorted by:
Your logic is sound, and I agree that it should be that way, but my understanding of how our constitution instructs the government to respond to cases of "widespread" election fraud suggests that the election is to be done again, and the military is to be put in charge of the (new) election process.
Admittedly, my understanding of the constitutional process for correcting a fraudulent election may not be correct. And, there is no historical precedent to illustrate exactly how that process would work, but from my research, I believe that something like this is highly likely to occur.
Empire Co., 322 US 238 (1944)). "There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments" (United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61(1878)
To your point, is there anything in the Constitution that outlines procedures for a situation such as this one? Even if widespread fraud is proven, I don't think there is. What was the John Adams quote? "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." So we were never meant to be here. The fact that we are says a lot about who we are.
Agree with your first point. Fraud. Vitiates. Everything. If there’s even a single fraudulent vote found for a candidate, in any state, that candidate should be disqualified. They should be able to reverse the election the moment they can prove that Biden received one fake vote.
"Fraud vitiates everything" is an abbreviation for "Systemic, outcome-determinative fraud vitiates everything". In this case, we do have systemic, outcome-determinative fraud".
Eh i dont know about this because there is probably at least 1 fake or fraudulent Trump vote somewhere
Agreed