War?
(gab.com)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Redaction codes on Fauci emails are pointing to possible military action.
B5 redactions "Reveal formally named or numbered U.S military war plans that remain in effect, or reveal operational or tactical elements or prior plans that are contained in such active plans."
Source for that?
B(5) exemption on FOIA request according to the FBI: Inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters that would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency.
https://www.fbi.gov/services/information-management/foipa/foia-pa-overviews-exemptions-and-terms
B(5) exemption on FOIA request according to FOIA.gov : Privileged communications within or between agencies, including those protected by the:
thanks
Should email this to Georgia SoS and let him know his involvement with China and his refusal to do a legitimate audit will not end well for him.
You know....weaponize this info
Also while similar to the others the B(5) DHS exemption on FOIA requests states: "Protects the integrity of the deliberative or policy-making processes within the agency by exempting from mandatory disclosure opinion, conclusions, and recommendations included within inter-agency or intra-agency memoranda or letters.
Example of information the Department of Homeland Security may withhold using 5: Draft documents and recommendations or other documents that reflect the personal opinion of the author rather than official agency position."
https://www.dhs.gov/foia-exemptions
It also might be worth noting that the link provided in the Gab post links to the National Archives and on said page they state it was uploaded in 2016. They might have been updated since then, is there any way to check this?
This only confirms what we knew all along, that the silent war continues. And this points us to 11.3/11.4
The would be supportive of our government being "belligerent" and should serve to confirm to us that we are continuing on the right track for "the plan".
Yes we are at war, and have been for a while.
Solid - great post!!
STICKY MODS - STICKY!
Tone down your confirmation bias and fact check pls <3
Those redaction codes were cherry picked from an archived web page from 2016 : https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html
Note they are redaction codes for National Archive releases not FOIA requests
These are the codes for FOIA requests : https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html
Wow. Good find/research.
deboonked.
Tone down your confirmation bias and fact check pls <3
Those redaction codes were cherry picked from an archived web page from 2016 : https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html
Note they are redaction codes for National Archive releases not FOIA requests
These are the codes for FOIA requests : https://www.archives.gov/declassification/iscap/redaction-codes.html
Why are you attacking me?
im not lul
It seemed excessive, but I'll accept your denial.
just a copy pasta "Tone down your confirmation bias and fact check pls <3" wasn't actually intended specifically for you if that's what you're referring too
Yes, I noticed the copy/paste nature of your comment and realized you were scolding the OP, but also scolding anyone that was applauding.
I was impressed with the OP's dig and did not bother to do my own DD. I appreciate your correction of the topic, and that you didn't want the mistake to go unnoticed.
The point is this wasn't a good find or good research, in fact it was just a weak google search taking results from a 7 year old archived site from the wrong institution.