Superparamagnetic nanoparticle delivery of DNA vaccine - PubMed https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24715289/
Superparamagnetic nanoparticle delivery...
Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo https://www.nature.com/articles/3301624
Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting...
Magnetofection: Magic magnetic nanoparticles for efficient gene delivery https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1001841720304228
BOMBSHELL EXPOSED - MAGNETISM INTENTIONALLY ADDED TO 'VACCINE' TO FORCE MRNA THROUGH ENTIRE BODY https://www.bitchute.com/video/OmpL3GdVFyNY/
"Magnetofection" search https://duckduckgo.com/?q=Magnetofection&atb=v258-1&ia=web
High speed death. What do they plan to do when the conservatives who didn't get it are the only ones left? An army of smart people who are mad that their misguided friends are dead. An army that will even be even stronger than the US military. Even when they win, they lose. Once again...
Nothing can stop what is coming.
People won't end up just fighting for misguided friends.
Mothers. Fathers. Brothers, sisters. Daughters, sons, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, nieces, nephews.
When I say that if my family dies from taking the vaccines, there won't be any "I told you so", there will be retribution, and it isn't a threat or just frustrated words, it is a promise.
yep
Highjacking top comment.
Magnetofection uses a different type of lipid nanoparticle than the listed ingredients in the vaccines. Could they be sticking one inside the other? Maybe. I don't think its impossible, though I'm not sure why they would. Without an external directed magnetic field there is no reason that I can think of to do so.
But it is possible that there is a magnetic effect, and that it is caused by magnetite nanoparticles (inside of, or not inside of lipid nanoparticles). Seriously though, without an external magnetic field I just can't see the purpose.
WRT "BOMBSHELL EXPOSED..."
A lot of what "the expert" said was incorrect. E.g.
We know that magnetofection is real, but we don't know the magnetic effect is real, so she was half right. Plus, magnetofection without an external magnetic field is basically useless. Having such a field in vivo doesn't make any sense either unless it was a really advanced device with pinpoint field accuracy, or just to hold the nanoparticles in place (like they say in the study) so they only interact with say, cells of the muscle (like to keep them from getting into the circulatory or lymphatic systems).
The particles themselves are probably not magnetic. They are like little iron-oxide balls. Iron magnets are magnetic because all of the little domains that produce magnetism are aligned in the same direction. That makes the whole big unit magnetic. That only happens when you make it happen (for the most part) by adding energy into the system, causing such an alignment of domains.
If something is produced randomly (like the magnetic nanoparticles) the domains will be misaligned. Now, because they are so small that might not be the case. I am not sure how domains align at that scale, however, if they are not misaligned then they would all clump together and their "Nanoparticle"ness would disappear, becoming just a clump that can do nothing. So the most likely case is that they are not themselves magnetic, but respond to an external magnetic field (which is what the literature says is their design purpose).
The papers also say they are not magnetic (paramagnetic means they are not themselves magnetic, but respond to an external field).
The person who was sticking things all over themselves I call bullshit. There is no way there is enough material OF ANY KIND in a shot to make something like that happen outside of a very localized spot. Plus its the only anecdotal case, so ya, total bullshit until proven otherwise.
She also made statements like:
There is no evidence for either of those statements. There is no evidence that the magnetite nanoparticles are in the vaccines at all, and no evidence that it is "more aggressive" than the lipid nanoparticles themselves. In fact without an external magnetic field I would think they would be less effective. And there is no evidence of any type of external directed magnetic field.
She said a bunch of other stuff that was wrong, but its too much to go into. She got more wrong or speculative than right.
Could the vaccines have these magnetite nanoparticles? Maybe.
Is there an obvious reason that they would? Not from a mechanical perspective that I can see.
The only reason I can think of that they would be in there at all, since they would almost certainly be LESS effective in vivo than the listed vaccine ingredients, would be to make people ask questions.
I.e., they could be in there because it makes them less effective, and its a white hat operation to make people ask WTF?
As you mention, the lipid nanoparticles that the pharma giants claims to be using are different from the ones mentioned in these academic papers from 2002-2015. My guess is that the stuff they are using today is based on that earlier research, but is a more sophisticated version of it. These papers patriots have dug up point us in the right direction, but they don't tell us everything we need to know about the magnetic vax effect.
Here's the abstract for the nature article
What this means to me is that, with the mRNA "vaccines" (ie. the ones without the adenovirus vector like Pfizer, Moderna) The scientist were worried that they would not disperse well in the body or collect in the "target tissues" so they attached them to nanosized iron oxide magnets and planned to drag them around the body with magnetic fields. In live testing (presumably animals), they managed to do this succesfully to get the "vaccines" tothe gut and blood vessels.
It's what makes the tech work well (several hundredfold better then without the magnets)
Now if they are using this in humans in the "vaccines" then are they applying magnetic fields at the same time to activate the "vaccine" Are they relying on our environmental magnetic fields. Are they using something else?
5g
Yes, I was wondering that. Maybe the 5G masts can drag the nanoparticles around the body with electric or magnetic fields.
I'm not an expert in aerials so I don't know. I do know that 5G can beam form towards your 5G phone using phased aerial arrays. Presumably, you will be holding the phone at the time so it's beam forming towards you too.
It is very suspicious that unnecessary 5G masts are everywhere. They sure have sprouted up all over our area.
I read somewhere about a connection between the plandemic and 5G but I dont remember where, sorry. You might want to look it up though. Might have been childrenshealthdefense.org
I've seen it too,
I want to know more about the physical mechanisms, I'm not going to believe in the 5G / vaccine connection unless I can see a plausible mechanism. This magnetofection might be it and it might not. It's seriously interesting though isn't it!
We ever consider since Patriots are in control, these 5G “masts” aren’t just Tesla’s wireless power stations, disguised as 5G masts. Possibility? Who knows.
I don't really want Tesla wireless power. Let's stick with wires, we know they are relatively safe. I wouldn't say no to a new power source like zero point though, as long as it were safe.
I was hearing of a 5G connection in March of 2020. That the [[[LOCKDOWNS]]] were cover to get 5G installed in all the schools.
We've all got downvotes with no explanation. We are over a target!
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5475249/pdf/main.pdf
If they were doing their homework, all researchers should have combed the literature in their topic of interest. I would have to say these covid-'vaccine' people knew where the mRNA would/could end up. The attached article shows a mouse study from 2017 where they used influenza mRNA in LNP and did biodistribution studies up to 11 days, see page 4, table 1: it went all over the place! They had to have known, or inferred from this very similar study. Why the magnetic/iron particles? I'm not versed in this science, but can only guess: maybe to direct to specific areas of the body, ie brain, etc.....direct by 5G or magnetic force/instrument? I'm sure lots of theories will be discussed, and more information found in the near future. This all gets more bizarre and surreal every day. And more criminal, more experimental, more secretive, ....crazy world. Science fiction becoming real in a big hurry.
I wonder how long the magnetic nanoparticles remain attached to their payload in the body. If they are being injected into humans, maybe they only have a limited time to use the nanoparticles to direct the payload.
I can't imagine there won't be long term issues from the iron oxide nanoparticles inside the body.
We'll see. This is one huge experiment. It just gets more and more crazy. And once this is out there in the public sphere, one can search and find scholarly articles a few years old and older talking about the technology. A maniac's dream to now have the entire global population as their test cases. I still want to find out exactly what Charles Leiber was doing for the Chinese. His nano-neuro-research ties in somehow....it's related to brain-nano interface. Maybe we just wait a week or so and that will come out.
This is the opposite. They wanted them to stay in the tissue and/or require minimal effort to get them into the desired location for transfection. What they DON'T want is for them to go into the circulatory system.
That's just this particular type of delivery system. There are other systems that work well also. However, its a pretty cool system for targeted delivery if used with other targeting systems (externally expressed ligands for cell specific targeting e.g.).
If they are in fact using magnetite nanoparticles, and they are using an external magnetic field (for which I have seen no evidence in any of the "I got the shot" videos) then what would happen is it would help the nanoparticles get into the muscle cells, and not go into the circulatory system (at least make it much less likely). If they were using this tech for that purpose, that would almost certainly be a great thing.
Laymans terms???
I'll try: "They" want us sterile, sick, dying, dead or at minimum thoroughly controllable using all the technological tools Dr. Frankenstein has at his disposal.
Once more: Humanity is being culled.
What does all this mean?
If you read and listen to the material they explain what it all means. It is pretty clear what the motive is.
Bards fm mentioned speaking to a doctor who has a paper clip stick to 50% of her vaccinated patients. A plain non-magnetc paper clip. Ive also heard it spreading to other parts of the body like the chest.
Magnet challenge video: https://odysee.com/@TimTruth:b/Magnetvaccinearmdocumentary:a
Some extra magnet goodies: Magnets: 2019 https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2019/09/190925083802.htm
https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/article/magneto-microcrystals-give-magnets-superpower-over-living-cells
Im sure you guys wont believe me, but ill tell it anyway, my cousin flew from Mpls to Texas, she got Pfizer shot in Jan, she set off the metal detector in Mpls, they proceeded to pat her down found nothing then used the wand. The wand buzzed as it went over her left shoulder where she got the jab she was perplexed obviously, she boarded the plane spent a week in Texas and on returning the same exact scenario happened in the Texas airport. I know, i know, i know just like you guys ive never heard this before, but as God is my witness this happened to my cousin i have since sent her Dr Tenpenny info so she can get informed, she is a normie so i pray everything turns out for her
I've put together a compilation of five videos on MAGNETOFECTION.
[[[MAGNETOFECTION]]] NEEDS TO BE KNOWN. PLEASE SHARE. https://www.bitchute.com/video/xLAR3TdSyOg3/
MAGNETOFECTION is a simple and highly efficient transfection method that uses magnetic fields to concentrate particles containing nucleic acid into the target cells.[1] This method attempts to unite the advantages of the popular biochemical (cationic lipids or polymers) and physical (electroporation, gene gun) transfection methods in one system while excluding their inconveniences (low efficiency, toxicity). Magnetofection is commercialized by OZ Biosciences and is registered as a trademark. The magnetofection principle is to associate nucleic acids with cationic magnetic nanoparticles: these molecular complexes are then concentrated and transported into cells supported by an appropriate magnetic field.[2] In this way, the magnetic force allows a very rapid concentration of the entire applied vector dose onto cells, so that 100% of the cells get in contact with a significant vector dose. Magnetofection has been adapted to all types of nucleic acids (DNA, siRNA, dsRNA, shRNA, mRNA, ODN), non viral transfection systems (transfection reagents) and viruses. It has been successfully tested on a broad range of cell lines, hard-to-transfect and primary cells.[1][3] Several optimized and efficient magnetic nanoparticle formulations have been specifically developed for several types applications such as DNA, siRNA, and primary neuron transfection as well as viral applications. The magnetic nanoparticles are made of iron oxide, which is fully biodegradable, coated with specific cationic proprietary molecules varying upon the applications. Their association with the gene vectors (DNA, siRNA, ODN, virus, etc.) is achieved by salt-induced colloidal aggregation and electrostatic interaction. The magnetic particles are then concentrated on the target cells by the influence of an external magnetic field generated by magnets. The cellular uptake of the genetic material is accomplished by endocytosis and pinocytosis, two natural biological processes. Consequently, membrane architecture and structure stays intact, in contrast to other physical transfection methods that damage the cell membrane.
The nucleic acids are then released into the cytoplasm by different mechanisms depending upon the formulation used: 1) is the proton sponge effect caused by cationic polymers coated on the nanoparticles that promote endosome osmotic swelling, disruption of the endosome membrane and intracellular release of DNA form, 2) is the destabilization of endosome by cationic lipids coated on the particles that release the nucleic acid into cells by flip-flop of cell negative lipids and charge neutralization and 3) is the usual viral infection mechanism when virus is used. Magnetofection works for primary cells and hard to transfect cells that are not dividing or slowly dividing, meaning that the genetic materials can go to the cell nucleus without cell division. Coupling magnetic nanoparticles to gene vectors of any kind results in a dramatic increase of the uptake of these vectors and consequently high transfection efficiency.
VIDEOS INCLUDED: https://www.bitchute.com/video/Dp5oABRFbT5z/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/a8HoHtzbOUzW/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/5l9zh2gthDgh/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/qEUHF0UOK3QI/ https://www.bitchute.com/video/qEUHF0UOK3QI/
MAGNETOFECTION https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24715289/ https://www.nature.com/articles/3301624 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1001841720304228
Which is why we hear of the magnetism spreading and working with another magnet. Crazy times. Great share. Thank you
comprehensive Article from "STATE of the NATION" MAGNETOGENETICS – MAGNETOFECTION and COVID-19 Vaccines Magnetofection & Covid Vaccines Posted on May 24, 2021 by State of the Nation https://stateofthenation.co/?p=66476
This only happens with the ID10t variant of the vaccines....
they're calling you an idiot :|
Yep, this version of the vaccine is so rich in iron that it turns your blood red when it touches air because of the instant rust.
Blood is red...
Yes, and it IS because of the Iron content and the oxygen bound to it(yes, rust). Even with all of that Iron in our blood, we are not magnetic....
Do you really think a small syringe of clear fluid could contain enough Iron to make a human magnetic even in one spot?
Some of you are just not very bright....
You mentioned nothing about magnets on your previous comment. So you can’t possibly expect me to think what you meant...
Sounds to me like you’re just not very bright.
And it’s not the iron that makes blood red, it’s hemoglobin... just FYI
Wow you are dense. Do you see the word Iron there?
This will blow your mind....your blood isn't red on the way back to your lungs....
" hemoglobin
n.
The iron-containing respiratory pigment in red blood cells of vertebrates, consisting of about 6 percent heme and 94 percent globin."
Wow.....just wow.
It is the iron that makes the hemoglobin red......
The whole reason we evolved to have iron in our blood is because oxygen bonds so well to it(iron-oxide aka rust). Our cells need oxygen to produce energy.
I am really starting to feel sorry for you reddit tendie meal kids.
Had no idea. I’m not medical. Had no idea that’s where the color came from. The more you know