I've already posted as much insider information as possible without identifying anyone or disrupting the process.
I would have actually been working the phase 2 portion of the audit but I ended up having car trouble and having to wait for parts for about a week which made me miss the training window.
My guess it wouldn't be an ordinary black light, but a specific frequency which can only reveal images.
Here is another post about watermarks disguised as random dots.
All modern printers already give out watermarks so you can track which printer the paper came from and on what date.
Machine identification code
I don't think his isn't an image of a current ballot, but a prototype for the future.
Per my source working the AZ audit when I asked about watermarks and what the UV light station is for:
The AZ ballots are being checked under UV-A and UV-B for tiny yellow dots / splotches.
In hindsight I didn't ask if the real ballots should or shouldn't have those marks however.
Yes. Here is what Jovan Pulitzer said about this....
https://twitter.com/JovanHPulitzer/status/1402748137513668609?s=19
ah, so both the original post and "TheQStrategy" are lying by implication, seems about right.
edit: careful, don't displease "TheQStrategy", you'll be banned as a "shill".
Appreciate the input, although if true, please keep your info on the down low.
I've already posted as much insider information as possible without identifying anyone or disrupting the process.
I would have actually been working the phase 2 portion of the audit but I ended up having car trouble and having to wait for parts for about a week which made me miss the training window.
Take care.