Just curious to find out if anyone came to this board to see the "Q crazies" and ended up finding that there aren't nearly as many crazies as expected, and maybe even ended up agreeing with some of the information posted here hadn't ever been presented before.
I certainly don't expect people who have been lurking for only a little while to be a full-blown Q follower, but am wondering how many people found out about this board from an anti-"QAnon" board or news article, just to end up sticking around because you are genuinely interested in it as a resource?
Cheers.
I first got to Q when I heard them ask Trump to condemn it for the first time (after a few years of hearing about it). He said “is that a bad thing” (that I’m President to stop elite pedos). I noticed how they could have answered “yes, FALSE accusations are a bad thing”, but they didn’t. They couldn’t even lie like with Russia, since Epstein was a thing. I thought “the accusations matter more than the source of the accusations”. I only got more into q proofs after the election.
Covid+the election are redpilling people to the fact we know nothing other than the elites are untrustworthy, and Trump’s presidency was more about redpilling than action. This ONLY makes sense if NCSWIC.
Sorry fren. Been on the train since 1999. Pizzagate, Q and email leaks just sped it up for me.
I do visit the "Qult" boards from time to time. Seems they are getting quite desperate now that literally everything is beginning to come to light.
My favorite posts are the "Do we have talking points for this yet...?" Lol. Critical thinking skills in the anti-Q movements are 0/10.
Same timeframe for me, interesting to read the same timeline. We were at the wrong place at the right time early in marriage. We woke early. It's been one hell of a ride and I'm tickled freaking shitless to see what is going on. It's an amazing time to be alive. Take care Fren.
Crazy isn't it?
I've come across a few like us that have been red-pill since pre-2000.
And even some old heads (40+ 50+ 60+) that have been red pilled even longer. The true OGs sit on stacks of silver and know this shit has been rigged since Day 1. They sadly just didn't have the means to communicate their vast knowledge on the internets with the 2nd Wave.
The funny thing is that those of us who've been pursuing the Deep State since pre 9/11 (or as of 9/11 in many cases) are the happiest Anons.
We don't date fag. We don't whine about Barr/Durham/Sessions. We don't give up and we don't give in.
Why?
Because we've been through it all before... we just didn't know it. And we spent nearly 2 decades trying to figure out "How the fuck can we do ANYTHING about this?!??!!?"
And Q & Trump (Q+) is our first and only chance to take it all down and assist with the ushering in of a new human renaissance.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Very well said, I'm screen capping that to show a couple friends.
We were well awake before 9/11, I read the entire BS patriot act. That put us into 2rd gear as preppers. Obama '08 election 3rd gear...'12 NDAA we jumped 3 gears into overdrive. Silver, gold, bullets, guns, food....we knew we were headed straight into an extremely shitty deal.
Then Trump! Then Q! Then all of the global Anons. Crazy!
It's like all our wildest dreams have come true and we have so few people to tell that would understand. We walk around will a perpetually shit eating grin.
BTW, my great uncle planted the seeds with me as a teenager in the 70's, and continued for years beyond. He was based as hell then. He died last year at 97.
It would be great to all get to meet on the other side of this. Take care.
Indeed. My step-grandfather planted the seed when he gave me an encrypted URL and a PW that contained a 68 MB file (huge at the time) which was an archive of nothing but examples of media spin taken from the newspapers and mapped over time to show the media's deception... pre-internet.
Went all the way back to older events in history, political theater examples, Left vs. Right optics, smear jobs, etc.
Very eye opening stuff.
2 years after that 9/11 occurred and it all unfolded in real time.
Once you are out of the Matrix, there is no way to go back into it. You can never unsee this stuff. Your entire brain is rewired (presuming your brain has the capability to be rewired in the first place)
I'm East Coast - have a list of Patriots to meet up w/ after the Awakening occurs!
That is crazy regarding your grandfather. The stories of how each of us landed outside the matrix intrigue the hell out of me. It's never an accident.
I'm mid-west. Farming community. We have a really solid network of Patriots, we'd pack our shit and be anywhere in the country in hours! I'm convinced we will all meet on the other side. We'll see if I'm right. Take care fren.
Dude that's the entire progressive movement in a nutshell.
[Eats crayons]
Yerp!
[Shits rainbow]
Q does not have followers.
Q has Fearless Members that remain and will Always be Independent Living Beings.
Q will never convert, even under threat of DeAtH.
Q is TRUTH over Falsehood.
Darnkess to Light.
WWG1WGA
Potato Potato
Did you really not understand what was meant by "Q Follower" or were you offended by the terminology describing someone who follows the intel drops by an entity who signs as "Q?"
Your energy appears to be misplaced.
Yeah, that was a tough read. Wow.
So, people who subscribe to a user's twitter account, to follow their posts and updates, are "researchers?"
I mean... Fauci is supposedly a scientist...
eVilLzz spermaTozzAa?
The user name is SecretLiberal, so I think jagoff is correct.
oh look, there's two of you. Yawn.
I might be confusing "learned about Q" with "found .win" -- I definitely learned about Q in 2019, but I guess I came here later? When did .win pop up?
You are saying that by visiting this board frequently, you began to adopt a conspiratorial mindset?
Says someone named SecretLiberal?
He/she is an active (albeit recent) member of the board who makes no effort to hide his/her biases. But he/she does make an effort to be intellectually honest about his/her position. Just because someone disagrees with you, doesn't mean they're acting in bad faith.
I'm trying to avoid bad faith / flame wars / fights / etc -- there's already enough of that everywhere, and it wouldn't contribute anything.
I'm honestly just here to see how the other half lives; this is important stuff and I've always been more interested in the smaller picture than the bigger picture.
Me personally? No; I kinda have more of a fatalistic, roll-of-the-dice view of the world.
But it's easy to see in Reddit/Twitter folks who cover this subject, or even behind-the-scenes political stuff in general (see: Louise Mensch, Seth Abramson): if your investigations require you to think in conspiracy terms, guess what? You're gonna start thinking in conspiracy terms, even when you shouldn't.
EDIT: banned, that's my cue, peace out yall -- it's been a ride.
I've heard maybe it's the CIA? But the term's been around forever, negative connotations and all, since at least the Civil War (which obviously had a few conspiracies in it).
One totally granular example: here's a book published in 1895, talking about the conspiracy theories behind secession.
Well, wait a second. If you didn't experience this, then how can you make the presumption that it is research that leads to conspiratorial mindsets?
Certainly you're not conflating correlation with causation?
But what about when you should? Conspiracies exist, which is why it's a legal classification of a crime. And more than that, we've seen in even just very recent years that there have been quite grand conspiracies that turned out not to be mere theories (or paranoia which is what most people actually mean when they say conspiracy theory). Whether we're looking at Epstein's connections, and to whom he was catering his underage sex slaves, or we look at the GME exposure of the Wall St cartel (another word for group of co-conspirators), or even the revelation from a few years ago that the FDA was being bribed by sugar lobbies to use fake studies that push the idea that fats were unhealthy and sugar was fine, when in fact, it turns out, increasing fats and decreasing simple sugars in the diet is much healthier for most people.
I completely agree that communities, such as this one, tend to attract the conspiracy-minded, but I would argue that is an effect, not a cause. I also agree that there are many (though I wouldn't say most) on this board who are conspiracy hammers (that is to say, when you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail), and tend to go down spirals lead by blind intellect -- but not any more-so than the vast majority of modern "scientists" where they are constantly changing theories (as it should be) but every year when it changes, stating with the foolish confidence rivaling the most zealous religious bigot, that they have finally cracked it with absolute certainty.
Asking questions is important, and trying to understand things, not taking status quo for granted, should be revered, not shamed. Perhaps if there wasn't such a pompous backlash to simply asking questions, many of the "flat-Earthers" would have finally learned something more about the nature of Earth and realized that it is, indeed, a Globe. Their theories and experiments to anyone who does understand something about astronomy, geology and physics, are obviously lacking, but that doesn't mean that there is nothing to learn from their investigations. They are right to question the current models, because clearly our current models are incorrect (or lacking data at the very least) in many areas or there wouldn't be things such as gravitational anomalies. Investigations into dark matter have been long and fruitless, and it would be beneficial to reexamine much of the scientific models we take for granted.
Because they voice those conspiratorial mindsets in their tweets and posts on the subject, fresh from the well.
Plus I'm just kinda extrapolating on big dumb human nature: spend enough time digging through dirt, you're gonna walk away dirty. Combine that metaphor with "When you've got a hammer, everything looks like a nail," and yep, that's what I'm trying to get at here.
I read something about this recently -- MSM writers investigating Q skeptically but feeling the same conspiracy mentality growing -- but it's lost somewhere in my twitter history, if I find it, I'll add it.
Totally agree -- but I think a knee-jerk reaction is unwise and often unhelpful, and that's what I keep seeing here: the automatic assumption that each and every discrepancy in the world is an indication of a secret conspiracy.
EDIT: banned, take it easy yall
Whereas, I would reiterate, this is an effect of the type of person drawn to a conspiracy theory, rather than a cause of researching it.
Yes, but this can be said of anything. If you spend all of your time studying mathematics everything looks like a math equation. All of your time in philosophy; everything is a philosophical law. But that doesn't mean these two conclusions are untrue.
Couldn't agree more. Nonetheless, everyone is on a different path; everyone being at different stages. Many need to discover this for themselves, and certainly there will be (and probably have been) times that you or I wrongly assume something true is just a knee-jerk assumption of the conspiracy-minded.
“For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows.”
Whether you're religiously-minded or not, no thinking person can deny the overflowing wisdom of the Bible (or many other religious texts). This verse in particular (1 Timothy 6:10) is what I attribute the cause of evil "cabals" or conspiracies that DO exist, rather than "Devil worship" as some on this board believe, as I tend to side with the philosophers that "The Devil" is a personification of evil, especially that capacity for evil that exists in man. But that is a separate discussion entirely.
I guess the point I'm poorly attempting to make is that we have to be our own judges of what is true or untrue, and that in any group or community (especially one open to the public) you're going to have a lot of differing opinions and ideas, few of which are common to or representative of everyone. The WBC doesn't detract from the Truth in the commandments of Jesus of Nazareth, which were first, and above all else, to love God (which is Wisdom and Truth, however else you may conceive of it), and second, to love others as yourself (which, often overlooked, is really a total of three commandments).
For me, I certainly don't accept the MSM's portrayal of Q, and do see enough in the drops to know there is something there, though I can't say for sure what most of it means, but I've never known an attempt to brainwash that involved constantly reinforcing that "followers" should do their own research and look into evidence themselves, and to constantly question everything -- taking nothing for granted. That seems like generally good advice.
However, I generally don't agree with a lot of the interpretations of the drops, especially the ones that operate on the assumption that every little detail of media or events are controlled by people. But I have no problem with them believing this, as freedom of thought is of the utmost importance.