Basically, the criticism is that English also has a lot of loanwords. I don't think English would be the best example, as it is a bastardization of many languages, including Saxon, French, Latin. Language purist in Germany and the Netherlands, for example, still use the word: Rechner, or Rekenaar, for the English word: computer, which is based on compute:
from Latin computare "to count, sum up, reckon together," from com "with, together" (see com-) + putare "to reckon," originally "to prune," from PIE root *pau- (2) "to cut, strike, stamp."
*pau- (2)
Proto-Indo-European root meaning "to cut, strike, stamp."
It forms all or part of: account; amputate; amputation; anapest; berate; compute; count (v.); depute; deputy; dispute; impute; pave; pavement; pit (n.1) "hole, cavity;" putative; rate (v.1) "to scold;" reputation; repute.
It is the hypothetical source of/evidence for its existence is provided by: Latin pavire "to beat, ram, tread down," putare "to prune;" Greek paiein "to strike;" Lithuanian pjauti "to cut," pjūklas "saw."
However, it is a rich environment to venture into neologisms. President, for instance. It does not exist in original Latin. The word respect, also a loan word, made more complex with the prefix: re: to see once again, we would say. Well actually, re denotes a counter direction. So the see again phase may or may not result in a different opinion.
At any rate, it does however jive with the main idea, that in certain languages originally abstract concepts leading to metaphysics were well known. A simply etymological investigation will review that, especially when you tie this in with religious concepts.
The main part of the argument is: because certain abstractions are not present in certain languages, the way the species has developed is different and ties into: self determination, freedom, morals, democracy, etc.
By merging of species, the more dominant may prevail and slip the IQ levels notches down on average, though within a population, certain groups may not be persuaded to mix at all.
To push that process further, if by injecting people with a spike protein that both hijack the biological communication systems within an organism AND the pathways of communication (nerves) then it is to be expected that the inter organism communication style changes too.
interestingly, those gifted with higher sensitivities when it comes to spirituality, already are reporting that those having been jabbed, seem to experience a stiffening of their previous exuberant communication style. Connection is no longer possible. Something is cut off.
Now this may be because of the topic of the jab itself. Because those who get them and those who are vehemently against it, do no longer share the same plane.
I guess we'll have to see what happens, and currently, several scientist are busy investigating this topic. But, it is a difficult topic that knows a lot of moving parts.
You are aware that the first bibles in the common tongue (middle English) were translated by Wycliffe in 1380, yes?
And it was not on behest of the Vatican the bible was translated by Wycliffe, he took it upon himself to do so. As is evidenced by many letters and parchments, writing and reading the common tongue was spread far and wide. Actually, the translation of the Latin Vulgate (meaning common) into locally spoken languages was a heresy in and of itself, as it challenged the supremacy of the Vatican. See also Unam Sanctam: no redemption without the pope and that is UNIVERSAL.
NWO USING THE KALERGI PLAN:
ELIMINATE OR DILUTE THE WHITE RACE SO PEOPLE WILL BE MORE COMPLIANT AND EASIER TO CONTROL UNDER COMMUNISM.
It is not the fact of killing that makes people more compliant and easier to control.
It is the type of people you leave alive.
From genetics we know there are vast differences between the races. These differences express themselves in communication style. See as a primer my post here: https://greatawakening.win/p/12j03kmXsU/genocide--a-different-view-out-o/
With that in mind falimarize yourself with this concept of a different communication style, that is deeply tied to biological makeup:
https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/05/morality-and-abstract-thinking/
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=WAoNhacojmM A lecture by prof Valberg.
Some criticism of that hypothesis.
https://jewamongyou.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/dr-eugene-valberg-on-african-languages/
Basically, the criticism is that English also has a lot of loanwords. I don't think English would be the best example, as it is a bastardization of many languages, including Saxon, French, Latin. Language purist in Germany and the Netherlands, for example, still use the word: Rechner, or Rekenaar, for the English word: computer, which is based on compute:
However, it is a rich environment to venture into neologisms. President, for instance. It does not exist in original Latin. The word respect, also a loan word, made more complex with the prefix: re: to see once again, we would say. Well actually, re denotes a counter direction. So the see again phase may or may not result in a different opinion.
At any rate, it does however jive with the main idea, that in certain languages originally abstract concepts leading to metaphysics were well known. A simply etymological investigation will review that, especially when you tie this in with religious concepts.
The main part of the argument is: because certain abstractions are not present in certain languages, the way the species has developed is different and ties into: self determination, freedom, morals, democracy, etc.
By merging of species, the more dominant may prevail and slip the IQ levels notches down on average, though within a population, certain groups may not be persuaded to mix at all.
To push that process further, if by injecting people with a spike protein that both hijack the biological communication systems within an organism AND the pathways of communication (nerves) then it is to be expected that the inter organism communication style changes too.
interestingly, those gifted with higher sensitivities when it comes to spirituality, already are reporting that those having been jabbed, seem to experience a stiffening of their previous exuberant communication style. Connection is no longer possible. Something is cut off.
Now this may be because of the topic of the jab itself. Because those who get them and those who are vehemently against it, do no longer share the same plane.
I guess we'll have to see what happens, and currently, several scientist are busy investigating this topic. But, it is a difficult topic that knows a lot of moving parts.
With all this in mind, listen carefully to the following about Mainland Chinese Protests https://yewtu.be/watch?v=ioqg_OLbHoA
Communication style vs dis-ease. Enter the jab. To be continued.
Very interesting thoughts, thanks for articulating them and backing them up with research.
You are aware that the first bibles in the common tongue (middle English) were translated by Wycliffe in 1380, yes?
And it was not on behest of the Vatican the bible was translated by Wycliffe, he took it upon himself to do so. As is evidenced by many letters and parchments, writing and reading the common tongue was spread far and wide. Actually, the translation of the Latin Vulgate (meaning common) into locally spoken languages was a heresy in and of itself, as it challenged the supremacy of the Vatican. See also Unam Sanctam: no redemption without the pope and that is UNIVERSAL.
And South Koreans it seems.