I can promise you, without a doubt, the earth is not flat. If it was flat, submarine navigation would not be possible. We would not have any nuclear submarines, nor would anyone else. The properties of a globular earth and its gravity are used in gyro navigation equipment to determine location in a 3d plane, underwater.
Flat Earth is absolutely positively THE most retarded thing anyone can believe. There are hundreds of independent pieces of evidence all converging on the same conclusion.
The wiki article is just a summary of the ideas on falsifiability in the philosophy of science, but if you want a primary source the main thinker associated with the topic is Karl Popper. I don't know what your last few sentences mean.
No, I still don't think I understand what he meant. if "unproven" and "disproven" aren't synonyms, then my guess would've been that "unproven" means something that has neither been proven or disproven. But that wouldn't make sense in the context of "can't be unproven" or "unproven had become proven".
Are you saying that unproven means something that was thought to be proven, then more info came out that made the proof look less convincing? That makes some sense, but then his statement that "unproven had become proven" still doesn't totally work with that definition to me.
https://nationalfile.com/audit-organizer-says-hundreds-of-thousands-of-ballots-missing-in-arizona-boxes-full-of-blank-ballots/
Please don't post Wikipedia as a source. I don't need any fart checkers.
I think for myself and so should everyone else.
If it was not a joke (obviously you didn't get mine) then I feel sorry for you.
Otherwise eat the souce.
Unproven had become proven already.
Hypothesis has been proven True.
XX
Doesn't matter that it's wikipedia. His claim is at the core of the scientific method.
The same scientific method that was created to unravel and study the mind of the lawgiver: God. That's why we speak of laws in science.
Stop acting like a flat earther.
Trust FaustXi he is also science tool.
Fauci is not a scientist.
He defies the scientific method with every fiber of his being.
You two would make great friends if you met under different circumstances.
And you are a simpleton who doesn't understand any nuance.
Try harder. You're off trail.
Your pride won't allow you to see clearly until you shed it. There's a reason why pride is the most grievous of all sins.
Genesis
Returderos
Trust Neil De Grass if he is your God
I don't care, you have free will.
Wear 7 masks if it works on your Globe Monkey.
I can promise you, without a doubt, the earth is not flat. If it was flat, submarine navigation would not be possible. We would not have any nuclear submarines, nor would anyone else. The properties of a globular earth and its gravity are used in gyro navigation equipment to determine location in a 3d plane, underwater.
And I can prove to you otherwise, not that I care.
You don't believe in God and he proved to me that he is real.
Love and Peace - free will.
Flat Earth is absolutely positively THE most retarded thing anyone can believe. There are hundreds of independent pieces of evidence all converging on the same conclusion.
You think you God?
Wanna bet 10K?
Not that I care, as you believe in TV and Scientism and Freemasons playing golf on the Moon.
You too weak for me to play Chess with you, but I can also play checkers.
Space Force is with me.
Are you a Jedi?
You sound like Killary or Obananna.
They share your views.
You have free will.
Take a vaxxSINs - FaustXi claims it is science.
Love you, will teach you if you want, but it will cost you.
Good Luck on Mars, wear 7 masks so you don't take ConVidzz to another planet.
Your shill script is years old.
I'd say try harder, but you've already lost.
The wiki article is just a summary of the ideas on falsifiability in the philosophy of science, but if you want a primary source the main thinker associated with the topic is Karl Popper. I don't know what your last few sentences mean.
No, I still don't think I understand what he meant. if "unproven" and "disproven" aren't synonyms, then my guess would've been that "unproven" means something that has neither been proven or disproven. But that wouldn't make sense in the context of "can't be unproven" or "unproven had become proven".
Are you saying that unproven means something that was thought to be proven, then more info came out that made the proof look less convincing? That makes some sense, but then his statement that "unproven had become proven" still doesn't totally work with that definition to me.
ThanQ