he did a segment on Newsmax claiming to have outed the man behind QAnon and made a half hour hitpiece trying to discredit and destroy our movement. It was utter nonsense and i think still up on youtube which tells you he is controlled opps.
Was it more of the "Q is Jim Watkins" bs? I'd honestly be open to a debunking of Q, but I don't think it would be one of those "they just want people trusting the plan while they usher in the new world order" sort of takes. I'm looking for the kind of guy that says the democrats are still bad, but all of the major figures touting Q theories are controlled opposition and the whole idea of Q was just a misdirection from pizzagate. If somebody debunks Q as a potential savior from political corruption and Moloch worshipers, but still acknowledges the corruption exists, that would be the best way to frame it for me to be potentially convinced.
Why?
he did a segment on Newsmax claiming to have outed the man behind QAnon and made a half hour hitpiece trying to discredit and destroy our movement. It was utter nonsense and i think still up on youtube which tells you he is controlled opps.
I was unaware... But makes sense.. Money grabbers.
Was it more of the "Q is Jim Watkins" bs? I'd honestly be open to a debunking of Q, but I don't think it would be one of those "they just want people trusting the plan while they usher in the new world order" sort of takes. I'm looking for the kind of guy that says the democrats are still bad, but all of the major figures touting Q theories are controlled opposition and the whole idea of Q was just a misdirection from pizzagate. If somebody debunks Q as a potential savior from political corruption and Moloch worshipers, but still acknowledges the corruption exists, that would be the best way to frame it for me to be potentially convinced.
Do a search for Jack Posobiec on this forum and read on!