Heavy red pill -> He's right if you consider yourself a "US Citizen" or "Municipal Citizen". The 14th amendment clearly says so. A US Citizen is a diminished political status, ostensibly created for the recently freed slaves, but then surreptitiously applied to the uniformed and unaware 99%....us.
He's absolutely right. Citizens, persons, individuals, voters, taxpayers, and many more terms refer to "legal fictions", just like the little Monopoly figures that you use to play Monopoly. We are all participating in a role-playing game and pretending to be something other than men and women. It all begins with the registration of your birth.
Residents, inhabitants, non-resident aliens, drivers, defendants, plaintiffs, affiants, litigants, homeowners, parties, etc. It's a long list and the semantic trickery is all-encompassing in both spoken and written word.
You either stand on the land as a man or woman, rejecting all other references to "who/what you are", or they create a "joinder" with you, opening the door to "do business" with whatever you as whatever legalese fictional word they can entrap you with.
Writing a book as we speak. Started as a paper, then a treatise, now a book.
Anna Von Reitz and Ken Cousens (Gemstone University) are the sources of most of what I've learned. I'm just trying to compile some of their stuff, along with many others, into a digestible morsel to give everybody the bare essence, big picture understanding of it all...
The "who is you" article isn't mine. I'm not informed enough to be able to teach others.
Good for you on writing. A compilation of available material might help to broaden my comprehension of the topic. A lot of what I've taken in has been bits and pieces that still look like a jigsaw puzzle that was just started.
Precisely! It was the same for me. I would watch/read this piece and that piece over the years, understanding up to a point, but never enough to confidently take any actions. I was stuck because I didn't have all the pieces to the puzzle, at least to what I found necessary to feel good about it all.
As such, the book is basically all the pieces assembled in a way that I wish I would have come across it all originally. It would have saved me a ton of time piecing it all together. But of course the advantage for me was, I learned it all so thoroughly that I'm finally able to write the book for others. In a way, it was more advantageous to do it the way I did it in terms of having a fuller understanding.
I live by a simple axiom; if it isn't simple, it's wrong. And fortunately, I've been able to simplify it all to my satisfaction.
The hard part of writing the book is three-fold:
Unwinding all the lies and deceptions we've all been brainwashed to believe that simply aren't true. For example, that we are a "democracy". Seems simple enough to say "Nope, we're a Constitutional Republic". But it isn't that simple because 99% of the population, government officials, media, etc. say otherwise. How could they all be wrong? Right?
Explaining that all our government/LEO "authorities" work for an interloping, foreign owned and operated services corporations (The British Territorial government and the Vatican municipal government) and they mostly aren't "bad guys", but simply as duped and brainwashed as the rest of us. This is a hard concept for most people to get a hold of as I've bounced it off so many friends and families this past year. All push back and all highly doubt it without exception.
As there are probably 100 different vital topics to understand, including just the right amount of information to support them without diving in so deep that the book would turn into thousands of pages. I could probably write 100 different books on each topic covering everything thoroughly, but only a rare few would ever care to read any of them, let alone connect all the dots. And it's the "dot-connecting" which is the fundamental point of my book. Without that, it's all just more information to file away in our minds.
And in terms of this board, convincing people that Q/Trump aren't going to "fix it for us". We-The-People have to do it ourselves, otherwise we're stuck in the same mess - "Meet the new boss --- same as the old boss" applies. Perhaps Trump/Q will assist by neutering the existing interloping forces, I don't know. Trump and Q worked for them and never said otherwise and I'm quite sure they knew/know it. At any rate, the best they can do is to "pave the way" for us to take back the control that was originally granted to We-The-People upon the founding of our nation.
As to the "Who is You" article. This is pretty obscure "legalese" stuff. If you understand who you are and where you are, your status, standing and capacity, than this doesn't really matter. The existing legal structure cannot ATTACH to "you", via deceptive JOINDERS and draw you into their fraudulent jurisdiction of the fictional dead.
They can't even get started without establishing jurisdiction. As one of my favorite guys (Karl Lentz) says, "It's a lifestyle". You either "get it" or you don't. If you don't, they're going to joinder you into their jurisdiction one way or another. You'd need 10+ years of study to out maneuver them. Nobody has that kind of time. Once you clearly understand WHO YOU ARE (man/woman standing on the land), the jig is up for them.
In closing, since you've engaged here a bit with me, I'd like to ask you a question; Which topic/subject/concept do you find most confusing and/or most unbelievable/unlikely, and why?
I ask everybody this questions that's had a chance to talk at length with me or read through some of my early materials and it has helped improve the book immensely. It doesn't matter how much you do or don't understand now. There are no dumb questions either.
In closing, since you've engaged here a bit with me, I'd like to ask you a question; Which topic/subject/concept do you find most confusing and/or most unbelievable/unlikely, and why?
There isn't much that I find unbelievable or unlikely. Lots of things are confusing or unclear to me but not on a subject level.
I would like to know what happens when a birth is registered. If a corporation is formed that you are led/taught to believe is you, who owns it, who is the executor, the beneficiary, etc?
Can a man just opt out of the game and refuse to answer questions or even speak when confronted by an "authority"? I really like the simplicity of "I decline your offer to contract" as a response. Does this really work?
Correct. You could liken some of them to Brittan's "peerage" or "landed gentry" (aka Dukes, Lords, Earls, Princes, etc.) whom are those that are allowed to own land. Basically, generationally wealthy families that "know the trick" and don't get sucked into the voluntary slavery system.
The rest would be those that have corrected their political status to either an "American State National" or "American State Citizen".
Says the resident.
Heavy red pill -> He's right if you consider yourself a "US Citizen" or "Municipal Citizen". The 14th amendment clearly says so. A US Citizen is a diminished political status, ostensibly created for the recently freed slaves, but then surreptitiously applied to the uniformed and unaware 99%....us.
He's absolutely right. Citizens, persons, individuals, voters, taxpayers, and many more terms refer to "legal fictions", just like the little Monopoly figures that you use to play Monopoly. We are all participating in a role-playing game and pretending to be something other than men and women. It all begins with the registration of your birth.
http://www.truthproject.co.uk/sites/default/files/freedom-veronica-chapman.pdf
Residents, inhabitants, non-resident aliens, drivers, defendants, plaintiffs, affiants, litigants, homeowners, parties, etc. It's a long list and the semantic trickery is all-encompassing in both spoken and written word.
You either stand on the land as a man or woman, rejecting all other references to "who/what you are", or they create a "joinder" with you, opening the door to "do business" with whatever you as whatever legalese fictional word they can entrap you with.
You should pop by for coffee and talk. I think I could learn a lot from you. Oh. "You" is another trick term.
https://www.scribd.com/document/125364178/You
haha, well done!
Writing a book as we speak. Started as a paper, then a treatise, now a book.
Anna Von Reitz and Ken Cousens (Gemstone University) are the sources of most of what I've learned. I'm just trying to compile some of their stuff, along with many others, into a digestible morsel to give everybody the bare essence, big picture understanding of it all...
The "who is you" article isn't mine. I'm not informed enough to be able to teach others.
Good for you on writing. A compilation of available material might help to broaden my comprehension of the topic. A lot of what I've taken in has been bits and pieces that still look like a jigsaw puzzle that was just started.
Precisely! It was the same for me. I would watch/read this piece and that piece over the years, understanding up to a point, but never enough to confidently take any actions. I was stuck because I didn't have all the pieces to the puzzle, at least to what I found necessary to feel good about it all.
As such, the book is basically all the pieces assembled in a way that I wish I would have come across it all originally. It would have saved me a ton of time piecing it all together. But of course the advantage for me was, I learned it all so thoroughly that I'm finally able to write the book for others. In a way, it was more advantageous to do it the way I did it in terms of having a fuller understanding.
I live by a simple axiom; if it isn't simple, it's wrong. And fortunately, I've been able to simplify it all to my satisfaction.
The hard part of writing the book is three-fold:
Unwinding all the lies and deceptions we've all been brainwashed to believe that simply aren't true. For example, that we are a "democracy". Seems simple enough to say "Nope, we're a Constitutional Republic". But it isn't that simple because 99% of the population, government officials, media, etc. say otherwise. How could they all be wrong? Right?
Explaining that all our government/LEO "authorities" work for an interloping, foreign owned and operated services corporations (The British Territorial government and the Vatican municipal government) and they mostly aren't "bad guys", but simply as duped and brainwashed as the rest of us. This is a hard concept for most people to get a hold of as I've bounced it off so many friends and families this past year. All push back and all highly doubt it without exception.
As there are probably 100 different vital topics to understand, including just the right amount of information to support them without diving in so deep that the book would turn into thousands of pages. I could probably write 100 different books on each topic covering everything thoroughly, but only a rare few would ever care to read any of them, let alone connect all the dots. And it's the "dot-connecting" which is the fundamental point of my book. Without that, it's all just more information to file away in our minds.
And in terms of this board, convincing people that Q/Trump aren't going to "fix it for us". We-The-People have to do it ourselves, otherwise we're stuck in the same mess - "Meet the new boss --- same as the old boss" applies. Perhaps Trump/Q will assist by neutering the existing interloping forces, I don't know. Trump and Q worked for them and never said otherwise and I'm quite sure they knew/know it. At any rate, the best they can do is to "pave the way" for us to take back the control that was originally granted to We-The-People upon the founding of our nation.
As to the "Who is You" article. This is pretty obscure "legalese" stuff. If you understand who you are and where you are, your status, standing and capacity, than this doesn't really matter. The existing legal structure cannot ATTACH to "you", via deceptive JOINDERS and draw you into their fraudulent jurisdiction of the fictional dead.
They can't even get started without establishing jurisdiction. As one of my favorite guys (Karl Lentz) says, "It's a lifestyle". You either "get it" or you don't. If you don't, they're going to joinder you into their jurisdiction one way or another. You'd need 10+ years of study to out maneuver them. Nobody has that kind of time. Once you clearly understand WHO YOU ARE (man/woman standing on the land), the jig is up for them.
In closing, since you've engaged here a bit with me, I'd like to ask you a question; Which topic/subject/concept do you find most confusing and/or most unbelievable/unlikely, and why?
I ask everybody this questions that's had a chance to talk at length with me or read through some of my early materials and it has helped improve the book immensely. It doesn't matter how much you do or don't understand now. There are no dumb questions either.
Thanks!
In closing, since you've engaged here a bit with me, I'd like to ask you a question; Which topic/subject/concept do you find most confusing and/or most unbelievable/unlikely, and why?
There isn't much that I find unbelievable or unlikely. Lots of things are confusing or unclear to me but not on a subject level.
I would like to know what happens when a birth is registered. If a corporation is formed that you are led/taught to believe is you, who owns it, who is the executor, the beneficiary, etc?
Can a man just opt out of the game and refuse to answer questions or even speak when confronted by an "authority"? I really like the simplicity of "I decline your offer to contract" as a response. Does this really work?
And what of the other 1%? Are they not considered US Citizens?
Correct. You could liken some of them to Brittan's "peerage" or "landed gentry" (aka Dukes, Lords, Earls, Princes, etc.) whom are those that are allowed to own land. Basically, generationally wealthy families that "know the trick" and don't get sucked into the voluntary slavery system.
The rest would be those that have corrected their political status to either an "American State National" or "American State Citizen".
People should not be afraid of their government...
I didn't. Maybe he did.
Delusional.
He’s so far gone it’s fucking ridiculous at this point.
Wouldn’t it be nice to see competency exams for office holders, including IQ, civics, ethics, and mental health?
Hey Joe - we the people order you to yield to US - the true holders of power. Now FOAD, you worthless POS