How is it possible every nation in the Antarctic treaty has held up their end of the deal? No oil exploration? Nothing? Seriously? Why does John Kerry keep going there? He may be a Globalist climate radical, but seriously? He's not a scientist! Why is every thing these people have done exactly like Nazis? Even down to medical experimentation?Where did those 43,000 german women who were shipped to Antarctica at the end of WWII go? Is it possible we are actually dealing with the 4th Reich? Did Nazis really escape to Antarctica? Why can't a plane traverse it? Why are all plane paths set to completely avoid it? Environmental reasons? For real? If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you! What is our reality? WHO or WHAT is in Antarctica?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (632)
sorted by:
LOL. I'm with you on that.
Antarctica is larger than Europe. Imagine flying over it and having to do an emergency landing. How the hell would you survive?
Seems like a plausible reason to never send aircraft over it as a means of transportation. No reason to, and plenty of reason not to.
People should drop this "argument" because nobody will take it seriously.
As for the rest, I dunno ...
I wonder if they are not really going to Antarctica, but rather either someplace in New Zealand or possibly Pine Gap, Australia (there is a US satellite surveillance base there), or maybe a ship named Antarctica.
See for yourself
flightradar24.com
I don't know.
Sure, and lots of ships, islands, rescue teams, etc. that at least have a chance of getting to them.
Yep. It's all a pro/con calculation. No real reason to fly over, no real benefit, and plenty of reason not to.
Not with the temperatures much of the year. This is not exactly Hawaii we're talking about here.
Simply think about the resources that could exist there. What could they build and traffic there without any knowledge. Epstein could be there in a fucking palace and we'd have no clue. They take and hide everything from us and it must end now. Also, lets say they have knowledge of an event coming or they are creating a natural disaster. What if Antarctica was the safest place to be
When the pole shift happens and the earth wobbles to the side, Antarctica will be on the equator, the U.S. will be the new south pole and Russia and China will be the North Pole. Antarctica will be on the equator. Future real estate deals going on with the powers that be?
The Earth never wobbles onto its side. Life on earth would end if it did so.
What does happen is called axial precession and it is caused by bulging at the equator induced by the moon and suns gravity. Imagine a line drawn north/south through the poles. The earth spins around this axis. But the axis itself also spins much like a spinning top which is easily seen as the tops rotation slows.
Right now Polaris is the north star but it hasnt always been. About 5000 years ago the north star was Alpha Draconis and in about 13000 more years it will be Vega. It takes about 26000 years for the earths axis to make one complete rotation and the geometry it carves out would look like two cones joined at their apices.
Provided it's livable, you're right.
I wouldn't want to live in northern Alaska, or the Arctic Circle, or Antarctica. But then, we don't know what they might have built there.
With that logic flying over the oceans is dangerous. No its weird that NO ONE flys over Antarctica? Something is there but what???