Tim Truth shows how statistics are skewed to present misleading information.
New England Journal of Medicine reported on the incidence of miscarriage in pregnant women, the majority being in their last Trimester, not < 20 weeks. The New England Journal of Medicine is cucked.
The truth within the statistics was the majority of women in the study were in their last Trimester. In reality, out of 127 women who were < 20 weeks pregnant, 104 miscarried. That's 82%. That's a lot.
This is their goal.
To kill us.
But WE'RE supposedly the unhinged violent ones? LMAO
I have lost faith in a large number of scientific and professional journals. The once prestigious Lancet for example, will never again regain its reputation after deliberately publishing completely fraudulent work. As a clinician and a researcher, it saddens me to see the complete politicization and censorship of almost all scientific and academic discourse and its takeover by financial agendas. Its manipulation by financial and political interests could not have occurred without the cooperation of the actual scientific research and academic community itself. Corruption can infiltrate anywhere and large parts of this community in particular have lost their way - and that is to the detriment of us all.
For decades I have watched the entire process of research slowly being coopeted by any number of private and governmental entities that fund junk science research in order to validate a larger globalist political intention. The researchers and institutions themselves are all too happy to pervert the science and take the money, while at the same time shoving to the side or burying legitimate research that could benefit humanity. At worst, they maliciously discredit research that makes conclusions not in line with the prescribed narratives. The careers of good researchers are destroyed. I can only pray that at some point in the future, if I live long enough, I can contribute to research that will help us and not harm.
And yet yesterday there was a report that the injections were being okayed for pregnant women. SMH.
They are twisting the conclusions of the studies into pretzels in order to make it sound different than what it should say. Keep in mind also, that this research was more than likely skewed from the beginning to come to a particular conclusion and it still showed problems. That indicates to me that the problem is even worse than what they are trying to hide with their word salad. They are all getting their marching orders from much higher up the food chain and no amount of research will make them halt what they are doing. This is biological warfare. The sooner we can get our heads wrapped around the fact that they want to kill and destroy us, the sooner we will be able to come up with strategies to fight back. The gloves are off and they will stop at nothing. Wake up as many as you can. We are fighting for our lives.
Contribution to depopulation:
The vaxxed women will die. The young fetus will die. The women will become sterile. If born, the baby will likely be sterile.
WE ARE IN THE MIDDLE OF WWIII
Here is one for you. I am starting to hear reports of animals of vaxed people turning on them. Also babies pushing their mothers away. What are they sensing? Sounds like something out of Terminator - we may need dogs to alert us to the DNA changes.
That's interesting. Seems babies and dogs can sense when something is wrong or abnormal. Like those dogs that tell diabetics their blood sugar is low.
I know of a breastfeeding baby that died a few days after mom got the 2nd Covid-jab. I have heard that a dog died after it's owner got the jab. I can't find it anywhere. Probably scrubbed.
If the spike proteins turn dogs into assholes, I will be more pissed than I am now, and I am very pissed.
The Covid jab is so new and already killed and maimed many people, which is what it was supposed to do. I think there will be further information in the future, and it will not be good.
We will have to expect almost anything. A well designed bioweapon will have a series of payloads. Just when the target thinks they have escaped the worst of it, boom, they get hit again - this time from a different angle. This genetic sequencing was designed by AI. Those bastards are testing it on the public to see if it works. Animals and babies can sense the changes taking place in the DNA that robs us of what makes us human. Really creepy stuff. They want our souls.
Absolutely.
They are starting trials on third trimester pregnant women.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/nih-begins-clinical-trial-testing-covid-19-vaccine-in-pregnant-women/ar-AALmBfK
NEJM has been sketchy for a long time. Search "NEJM editor quits" and you'll see a history of contention.
The real question is: What is going to happen to the babies of the 18%?
I'm not optimistic about them.
Only God knows what will happen when thes babies are carried to term- childhood cancers, autism, mental retardation, inability to walk ,talk, seizures? The placental barrier is very permeable.
Where did you get the 82%?
I'm not doubting the figure, just curious where the numbers came from.
Skimmed through the ~4 hr video, it seems that Tim Truth has combed through the VAERS data, and identified 500+ miscarriages after the pregnant women got the COVID-19 jab. In the video, it seems like he is going through the various VAERS reports.
Presumably the 82% figure comes from (500/x)*100%, where x ~ 600 or so.
Is the value of 'x' known? If so, what's the source for it? I gather it is, given that you've given a percentage.
The person critiquing the study looked at the data and chose ONLY the women who were less than 20 weeks pregnant. There were 127 women < 20 weeks pregnancy. 104 miscarried. That is 82%, only looking at women < 20 weeks pregnancy.
The chart put forth implies the women were < 20 weeks pregnant. But in reality, the majority were in the late phase of pregnancy. Their placentas were already established. So they didn't miscarry. But they were added to the total to bring the % of miscarriage down.
The vaccine makes your body attack Syncytin which your body makes, and is essential for the development and health of the placenta.
Ah, everything in your original post, which just didn't click until you replied.
Thank you fren.
My pleasure, fren. :)
Follow-up question.
They were critiquing this study, right?:
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2104983
And roughly where in the video that you linked did they do this?
From what I seen, the video was about the VAERS database miscarriages (presumably they touch on the New England Journal Of Medicine study in there).