Chances are we've already seen this 'unseen footage,' so whatever on that. But let's talk about Sen. Kyrsten Sinema while we're here:
It's rather interesting that Sinema is in possession of this footage. Also rather interesting that she, along with Joe Manchin, are essentially the life line that's keeping the U.S. from falling into the abyss. I particularly remember her running for Senate on a socialist platform but since getting elected her positions indicate she's left of center. Hell, she stood and applauded Trump on her OWN accord during one of his SOTU addresses.
It's notable that the DS has seemingly lost control of Sinema, and likely have. My theory is that she's under patriot control. They had a talk with her and showed her the proof that she did not win her election in 2018 and should not be in the Senate. From that point on, she's been under white hat control.
Another interesting possibility is that she could flip to Republican after seeing how full of shit and corrupt the Democrats are. All it takes is one Dem to flip to completely destroy their agenda, and her or Manchin (or even both) flipping would be their worst nightmare.
Also worth pointing out: Sinema = Cinema. We're watching a movie.
Well, if the other poster is right, and she is under white hat control, she would tow the party line when it did not matter (i,e, Impeachment 1 and 2, they never had the votes and they knew that before it started) - think cover and concealment. You could be right, but I hope she's actually an asset under control of the white hats.
Exactly. Not saying this theory is true or false, but if it were true, then it would make sense for Sinema to keep a fairly low profile. If she had voted "No" with the Trump impeachment, she certainly wouldn't have been able to keep a low profile.
Hers was not a deciding vote. She may have figured out easier in that case to toe the Dem line. I can't imagine that if she had any common sense at all, she knew Trump was not guilty of what they were impeaching him on, but she knew that he would not be convicted. We're dealing with political strategists here, not people of moral principles.
I don't think she's Deep State, but she clearly believes several evil policies. Most democrats are DS and do exactly what they are told, but some are independently evil and do what they want.
I was thinking the same, however if we are in the middle of a sting, everyone stays in character till the sting is complete. Unless your part is complete and you want to give them an OH SHIT moment. Like crossing the isle.
Yeps, I concur we pretty much got most footage of that day since we ripped everything but who knows maybe some did took something but was afraid to release it
Early in her career she had a moment where she basically outlined how her colleagues get away with shit by being above the law. This was when she was known as the titty dancing girl with a handler. The handler seems DS but her actions don't always align with him. Absolutely the toughest player to nail down.
My question too. I've never seen anyone with good, solid reasoning on exactly how she could be a plant. I'm usually in on a good theory that goes against the narrative, but this one i just don't see.
Chances are we've already seen this 'unseen footage,' so whatever on that. But let's talk about Sen. Kyrsten Sinema while we're here:
It's rather interesting that Sinema is in possession of this footage. Also rather interesting that she, along with Joe Manchin, are essentially the life line that's keeping the U.S. from falling into the abyss. I particularly remember her running for Senate on a socialist platform but since getting elected her positions indicate she's left of center. Hell, she stood and applauded Trump on her OWN accord during one of his SOTU addresses.
It's notable that the DS has seemingly lost control of Sinema, and likely have. My theory is that she's under patriot control. They had a talk with her and showed her the proof that she did not win her election in 2018 and should not be in the Senate. From that point on, she's been under white hat control.
Another interesting possibility is that she could flip to Republican after seeing how full of shit and corrupt the Democrats are. All it takes is one Dem to flip to completely destroy their agenda, and her or Manchin (or even both) flipping would be their worst nightmare.
Also worth pointing out: Sinema = Cinema. We're watching a movie.
Well, if the other poster is right, and she is under white hat control, she would tow the party line when it did not matter (i,e, Impeachment 1 and 2, they never had the votes and they knew that before it started) - think cover and concealment. You could be right, but I hope she's actually an asset under control of the white hats.
Exactly. Not saying this theory is true or false, but if it were true, then it would make sense for Sinema to keep a fairly low profile. If she had voted "No" with the Trump impeachment, she certainly wouldn't have been able to keep a low profile.
Yep shes a DINO. Demonrat in name only.
Hers was not a deciding vote. She may have figured out easier in that case to toe the Dem line. I can't imagine that if she had any common sense at all, she knew Trump was not guilty of what they were impeaching him on, but she knew that he would not be convicted. We're dealing with political strategists here, not people of moral principles.
More likely she figured out how much power the swing votes have
What data do these people look at that make them think going against Trump will win them elections?
Every election of the last who knows how long. Ask Bernie how his last 2 primaries went.
Then ask his wife now those charges got dropped.
I don't think she's Deep State, but she clearly believes several evil policies. Most democrats are DS and do exactly what they are told, but some are independently evil and do what they want.
I was thinking the same, however if we are in the middle of a sting, everyone stays in character till the sting is complete. Unless your part is complete and you want to give them an OH SHIT moment. Like crossing the isle.
She has shown an independent streak, a la Tulsi. That is rare for Dems and generally, they don't last very long in politics.
Yeps, I concur we pretty much got most footage of that day since we ripped everything but who knows maybe some did took something but was afraid to release it
mcturtle would flip to dem if the switched to R.
And lose out on being Senate Majority leader?
I’ve thought AOC was a plant from day 1. The first person to give her any attention was trump with a tweet. Ha!
That's an interesting idea. Are there a good number of Anons that think this? If so, do you know their line of reasoning/evidence?
Early in her career she had a moment where she basically outlined how her colleagues get away with shit by being above the law. This was when she was known as the titty dancing girl with a handler. The handler seems DS but her actions don't always align with him. Absolutely the toughest player to nail down.
Link : https://youtu.be/TJlpS4vhKP0
My question too. I've never seen anyone with good, solid reasoning on exactly how she could be a plant. I'm usually in on a good theory that goes against the narrative, but this one i just don't see.
I've always maintained that aoc and crew were Trojan horses given their seats but the white hats