Read each sentence carefully.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Hmmm... are we willing to trust Tucker and his whistle blower? Over the NSA? Which is on our side, per Q.
Are we to believe that the NSA just insta-caved to Biden and began spying on Tucker?
If Tucker was caught up in foreign comms, he wouldn't have blown the whistle.
If Tucker was on our side, he would continue to push the election fraud truths.
Fox bailed on us like a hooker after seeing an empty wallet.
I think this is a Snowden V2 micro-attack to begin setting an anti-NSA narrative. Or at least planting the seed.
What makes you so confident?
We've seen time and time against how Dems/deep state/whatever you want to call the kiddiediddlers openly flaunt their wrong doings and nothing happens.
Not to mention this is an old school tactic of getting out ahead of the press.
Just my hunch. Don't trust him. If he was actually doing something that would warrant a legit NSA warrant; he wouldn't draw attention to it.
I think he's just part of the plan to build an anti-NSA narrative as a faux "right winger"
Agreed. Cuck-er is controlled opposition.
If not a full blown C_A plant
Yet, Snowden did just that. He attempted to burn the NSA in [their] behalf. That wouldn't have happened IF [they] are being truthful and honest about [their] offshore dealings.
No, IF Cucker Tarlson has nothing to hide, then he WOULDN'T have gone public with this fear mongering.
You have it backwards.