Scientists analyzed the ingredients of a Pfizer Covid-19 vial >99% of shot is Graphene Oxide. Poison. More studies to follow.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
99%? Someone please venture an opinion about the site this was published on, because when I went there, it does not have the feeling of legitimacy. They say a vial of vacc is 99% poison. If that were true, every bit of Pfizer vac would be pulled immediately because no one is that stupid, to push vials of Graphene Oxide on people because it is essentially, murder. But nothing is beyond the realm of possibility in this completely insane timeline.
It is well known by those who bother to inform themselves about the vax technology that the mRNA is delivered inside of graphene (carbon) nano-tubes. The nano-tubes act as a type of molecular scale capsule to house the mRNA to prevent our bodies immune system from destroying the mRNA before it can react with our cells.
Carbon nano-tubes; Bucky Balls; carbon(60) molecules; graphene. All basically the same shit.
It's closer to ultra (ultra) fine particles of pencil lead, or charcoal dust than 99% of the people who are pumping that molecular sized grit into their blood stream can imagine. And I'm not even exaggerating as much as many people reading this assume I am. That's just the capsule. The mRNA genetic stuff is a whole different topic.
Indeed. But that is not the issue.
The claim is that the shot consists of 99% graphene oxide. That is a claim that can be checked, proven or disproven. From what I have read and linked to last week, I would not draw the conclusion of the shot consisting of 99% Graphene oxide.
THis 99% is about the imagination of 99% of the people.
The link left by sadanon in this thread has much informative discussion. This link to redvoicemedia referenced the same study used in that thread. If anyone has the link to the original Spanish article, I'll read it and report back. Of course a translation can't vet for lies. I agree with your assessment... If it's poison, the amount in absolute terms is very significant, and the person interviewed here seems to disregard that entirely, which seems suspect. But worth paying attention to: let's see if other labs and researchers can duplicate the results.
Greater than 99% means 100%. So the vaccine is a solid?
This is utter bullshit.
Surely we take this to mean "in solution/emulsion/saline" although I see your technical point.