The concept that somebody can owe allegience to 2 nations is antithetical to the very idea of a nation as a discrete group of people united under shared elements within a border. If you can be both a citizen of Saudi Arabia and of America, then what principles are you held to? Who are your people? It creates conflicting loyalties and the sort of "citizen of the world" type shit. Those are my views at least on the concept in a broad view.
This is the key issue imo, dual or even Tri Citizenship isn’t about allegiance at all… it’s mainly for tax and healthcare benefits. It’s a bastardized world.
The concept that somebody can owe allegience to 2 nations is antithetical to the very idea of a nation as a discrete group of people united under shared elements within a border. If you can be both a citizen of Saudi Arabia and of America, then what principles are you held to? Who are your people? It creates conflicting loyalties and the sort of "citizen of the world" type shit. Those are my views at least on the concept in a broad view.
And you wouldn’t be wrong … then put those people in congress and all levels of gov’ment … and here we are.
But muh globalism...
Bbuttt...muh tax benefit & healthcare?
This is the key issue imo, dual or even Tri Citizenship isn’t about allegiance at all… it’s mainly for tax and healthcare benefits. It’s a bastardized world.
Allegiance to ONE and one only nation. Anything different should be illegal.