https://apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-health-941fcf43d9731c76c16e7354f5d5e187
This, there's multiple interations of the news and it's the new reddit gospel.
But something doesn't add up. COVID deaths, if you believe they're real, tend to compound with advanced age and comorbidities.
Those are precisely the people who were vaccinated first. I believe statistics show vaccine hesitancy is mostly in under 30s and rural areas.
So where's the connection? Is this liberals abusing correlation or is the statistic pulled out of no where?
From what I know, when you get the vaccine the only record that remains of it is your vaccine card. If someone died of "covid" the only way to know if they have the vaccine or not is family or if the person who died was able to report it before they passed away.
If the common sense argument that "if we go by the literal definition of what it is, that is something that provides immunity, by virtue, it's clearly not doing its job" doesn't work, there's this.
Another thing that can be done is to compile legitimate data on those who received the jab and those who didn't, all within the same age group, and compare daeth rates, labels aside.
The claim that the needle provides 95% efficacy against the coof is pure crap. The numbers they got was from a ratio of a ratio, the true figure is more like 0.2% - 0.7%.
So I read an article last night. I believe it said 95% effective against severe illness but in the last 6 months has dropped to 60% effective from catching it. Supposedly due to the “Delta” variant. I can’t find it right now for sauce I’m sorry 😬
Per what I’m getting and I’m no doctor or virologist but it seems the US is the only one coming up with these numbers of unvaccinated being the ones dying. Every other country statistics I’ve been seeing saying the opposite. Also pointing out the vaccinated are spreading it like crazy still.
No it's very similar in other countries where more people who have had the needle are getting sick again. There is a well written article on here which explains how the Gov and Pharma have used a ratio of a ratio to get that number of 95% efficacy.
The more realistic figure of efficacy is about 0.2% - 0.7%. Statistics can be manipulated to get any outcome one wants. Also don't be forgetting that when they needed the "CASE" figures high to trash the Trump presidency and spread fear, they used the PCR test with around 45 CT (think of it as amplification x) and at 45 CT's even the maker of the test said you will get almost 100% false results as it is not supposed to be used like that. They told people they had CV even thought they had zero symptoms, the only time in history one can be unwell without feeling unwell. A PCR test will pick up dead cells from multiple viruses, and if amplified to a huge extent, from months back.
Within 1 hour of the strange swearing in of Biden, the WHO released a statement instructing country's to drop the PCR CT's to 28 and below.
Exactly right, the UK last week reported 117 deaths, 43% were double vaccinated, over 60% at least 1 dose. They make shit up as they go along.
https://www.newsbreakapp.com/n/0ah9ojxZ?s=a99&pd=025euro5&hl=en_US
@Scorpion76 is right here. The 95% number is a relative risk reduction (RRR) where all sick in the treatment group are compared against all sick in the control group. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) where the entire groups are compared is less than 0.8%.