You can grab some popcorn and enjoy the show. You can admit that you got got and move on with your life. What can stop what is coming? The answer is nothing.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤡 CLOWN WORLD 🤡
That is an enormous conversation to have. Yes, I have been involved with this community for a long time and have seen pretty much everything you guys discuss. But as I do not accept Q’s claim of having access to top secret information based on what he’s posted, none of the rest of his evidence has much impact for me until that singular fact has been verified beyond all doubt.
We see what your side has sacrificed for Q. Many of you have lost family, friends, jobs, and even legal freedom in service of what you believe to be the truth. Convincing me to embrace that lifestyle is going to require proof far heavier than anything I’ve seen so far.
Can you explain the zero deltas? IE how Q would post and then Trump would post to Twitter within the same minute, but after Q? Because there’s 20+ examples of that. That was the biggest holy shit for me, as in it was obviously coordinated. I’ll even be extra nice and post the archive of Qmap.pub before the lefties Doxxed the owner and sent him death threats. Thanks Q for telling us to archive everything.
QMap.pub
http://web.archive.org/web/20191229235001/https://qmap.pub/proofs
All you have to do is scroll down to December to find the first of many.
Quick reply: both Trump and Q are prolific posters probably in roughly the same time zone. Trump probably shares “zero deltas” with millions of Twitter users. See if there are any deltas between him and, say, Elon Musk or Pewdiepie or something. It’s easy to see deltas if you consider only connections between Q and Trump to be important, because you consider Q important.
I respect your answer, but....
A quick search brings up a Wikipedia article discussing Trumps social media use.
Right now I’m comparing the window of (roughly) October 2017 (when Q started) to December 2019 (a few months before Qmap was shutdown)
In that time, Trump tweeted on average 16 times a day. Q posted on average, 6 times a day. That means Q had 6 opportunities per day to post directly before Trump, within the same exact minute, and they had to do that 20+ times in the 2 year span. Do we have any math fags in here who could calculate the probability of that happening?
I guess, pick your favorite celebrity and then you tweet 6 times a day, do that for the course of a year, and tell me how many times you’re able to post before AND within the same minute as them. If you can do it even three times, I’ll buy you a beer. If you can’t, I’ll still buy you the beer because I respect how you came into the lions den level headed.
It is a sound strategy to examine this question the way you’re suggesting. I have a busy weekend right now, but I’m going to come back to take a look at this later.
Okay, I appreciate the reply but you didn't really answer my question directly, I only make the distinction because it's quite different to see individual 'happenings' as some call them than it is to watch a collated and exhaustive montage which ties them together.
Obviously I'm not saying you haven't but just asking for clarification.
Anyway, I'm definitely not a Q wizard and some possess much greater understanding about the whole thing than I do so I don't profess to be an authority.
As an aside, because you made mention in a comment that your peers are concerned about what the Q folks might do should the plan not come to fruition; what is your perception and judgement of the character of the average Q believer? If you choose to respond, answer how you like, I don't expect you to write a novel.
That’s a good question, but one that is hard to answer. You guys all definitely share some common traits, but I’ve talked with enough of you one-on-one to know that you come from different backgrounds and have individual reasons for being here. I don’t want to trivialize that by stereotyping.
Lolol....Look, this isn’t personal. I’m just responding to all your comments because I’m genuinely intrigued by how you can use logic to arrive at the conclusions you fight so hard to advocate.
If I understand your comment correctly, you’re saying you ignore information that might require re-evaluation of your preconceived notions?
No. If I was ignoring information, I would not be spending the hours a week I do chatting with you guys. I’m here. I’m not ignoring anything.
I’m more trying to avoid getting bogged down in a huge, general conversation on Q proof right now simply because I don’t have internet outside of my phone for a few days, and my thumbs hurt. :)
I also don’t think people here appreciate big debates taking place in the middle of their threads in the one place generally safe from “shills” trying to debunk everything. I try to respect your space.
If you have specific things you want my take on, I’m happy to do it in a designated thread in a couple of days once I can use a laptop again.
I appreciate your willingness to discuss as well as your consideration of our space.
Convincing skeptics is not really where this movement is now. Most of us spent Nov-Feb trying to do that, often in futility. Like others here I am convinced that the doubting world will get all the proof it can handle in the coming months. Those who have not closed their minds will find themselves wondering how the Qtards saw it coming.
The real question, by the way, is how did they not see it coming.
Well, regardless of which one of us is right, I can sometimes be helpful in you understanding why I am not seeing what you’re seeing, since I try to be pretty clear and open about what I’m seeing when I look at Q stuff.
My friend, you can let your reddit friends know that any effort on their part is nothing short of futile. You can't outsmart us nor can you hope to counter us.
Nothing can stop what is coming. The only question here is: will you choose a side and be victorious or will you fade into eventual obscurity as an outcast?
You would be wise to remember the story of the soldier who had allegiance to two countries and what happened to his body after he died.
Sounds like you're doing exactly what you accuse us of. You (we) disbelieve everything Q (the media) says without consideration solely based on a limited set of inaccuracies.
If that were true, I wouldn’t have been hanging out with you guys for the last few years and spending far more time than I need to talking respectfully with you about it here right now.