These AI systems operate on an algorithm no doubt. Like all algorithms, there must be ways to derail them with the right vocabulary or syntax. I wonder what these AI systems would do if we all suddenly started conversing in old English. We often laugh at the "grammar Nazis" that show up when a user makes a mistake. What if these are more bots that aim to keep the margin of error down to a minimum, thereby keeping the efficacy of the algorithm as high as possible?
I, a confirmed Grammar NAZI, also know my fair share about Natural Language Processing, etc. Here's my take on it: Provided the algos are robust and flexible, they can adapt pretty well to changes in spelling. What they have a hard time doing is if you speak in terms of metaphors, or use a lot of references to cultural stuff ("E.T. fooooone hoooome." is probably not one an algo would know what to do with, at least at the outset.).
And yes there is a dangling participle in the last sentence. Feel free to roast me, I guess.
Remember that conversational chatbot from Microsoft a few years back that got hammered online within hours?
The premise was to learn from conversations, the problem was the input feed was too vast (everyone), and internet trolls were able to trick the bot into saying some hilarious stuff.
ALCHIMY, n. [It. alchemia; Ar. al, the, and kimia, secret, hidden, or the occult art, from (Ar.) kamai, to hide. See Chimistry.]
The more sublime and difficult parts of chimistry, and chiefly such as relate to the transmutation of metals into gold, the finding of a universal remedy for diseases, and an alkahest or universal solvent, and other things now treated as ridiculous. This pretended science was much cultivated in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, but is now held in contempt.
American Dictionary of the English Language Noah Webster 1828
Updated by Pulitzer, the entry now reads
ALCHEMY, n. [It. alchemia; Ar. al, the, and kimia, secret, hidden, or the occult art, from (Ar.) kamai, to hide. See Chemistry, also see Politics.]
The more sublime and difficult parts of politics and chemistry, and chiefly such as relate to the transmutation of votes into gold, the finding of a universal remedy for the Corona VIrus, and an alkahest or universal solvent, and other things now treated as science. This pretended science was much cultivated in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and is now held in awed reverence by a dangerously significant proportion of the U.S. population.
American Dictionary of the English Language Jovan Hutton Pulitzer 2021
Q post 164 gives me hope. What a lovely day that will be...
u/#q164
future proves past...... as Q says. I am seeing more posts come true, too.
These AI systems operate on an algorithm no doubt. Like all algorithms, there must be ways to derail them with the right vocabulary or syntax. I wonder what these AI systems would do if we all suddenly started conversing in old English. We often laugh at the "grammar Nazis" that show up when a user makes a mistake. What if these are more bots that aim to keep the margin of error down to a minimum, thereby keeping the efficacy of the algorithm as high as possible?
I tried looking that up the other day to no avail. Link me if you can.
I, a confirmed Grammar NAZI, also know my fair share about Natural Language Processing, etc. Here's my take on it: Provided the algos are robust and flexible, they can adapt pretty well to changes in spelling. What they have a hard time doing is if you speak in terms of metaphors, or use a lot of references to cultural stuff ("E.T. fooooone hoooome." is probably not one an algo would know what to do with, at least at the outset.).
And yes there is a dangling participle in the last sentence. Feel free to roast me, I guess.
Make Robot Break.
Aha! Hiding Under the Floorboards, I Have Finally Found You!
Now you know why we mess with gram nazi so much here.... improper grammar helps.
aveHay eWay iedTray igPay atinLay etYay?
Remember that conversational chatbot from Microsoft a few years back that got hammered online within hours?
The premise was to learn from conversations, the problem was the input feed was too vast (everyone), and internet trolls were able to trick the bot into saying some hilarious stuff.
What we see...
Ricky Jay / The History Lesson
https://youtu.be/FtgUSUHnzLI?t=2943 (timestamp - 7 minutes)
What we do not see...
https://youtu.be/O2uL1G6zd6w (17 minutes - skip through the ads)
Why is this important?
Jovan Hutton Pulitzer / Understanding The Election Audits - The New Gold Standard
https://youtu.be/yusrOppXJ8I?t=47 (27 minutes)
How dumb have we become?
Here's what our forefathers had to say about it:
ALCHIMY, n. [It. alchemia; Ar. al, the, and kimia, secret, hidden, or the occult art, from (Ar.) kamai, to hide. See Chimistry.]
The more sublime and difficult parts of chimistry, and chiefly such as relate to the transmutation of metals into gold, the finding of a universal remedy for diseases, and an alkahest or universal solvent, and other things now treated as ridiculous. This pretended science was much cultivated in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, but is now held in contempt.
American Dictionary of the English Language Noah Webster 1828
Updated by Pulitzer, the entry now reads
ALCHEMY, n. [It. alchemia; Ar. al, the, and kimia, secret, hidden, or the occult art, from (Ar.) kamai, to hide. See Chemistry, also see Politics.]
The more sublime and difficult parts of politics and chemistry, and chiefly such as relate to the transmutation of votes into gold, the finding of a universal remedy for the Corona VIrus, and an alkahest or universal solvent, and other things now treated as science. This pretended science was much cultivated in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, and is now held in awed reverence by a dangerously significant proportion of the U.S. population.
American Dictionary of the English Language Jovan Hutton Pulitzer 2021
12 minutes after comment posted you replied.
51 minutes of video linked in the comment.
The greatest trick an alchemist ever played...
was fooling the gullible that transmutation of
lead into gold was possible.
From then on it was just...
A fool and his money parting.
Watch the videos first...
It might change you opinion...
"about other things now treated as ridiculous."