One reasonable explanation is that Trump doesn’t agree with you about Warp Speed not being about the virus. It was about the virus, and as Trump admitted, he was deliberately playing the virus down. On tape. And that it was “more deadly than the most strenuous flus.”
I know that you don’t believe that narrative, but it’s a narrative in which things that Trump has said and is currently saying make sense.
Trump didn’t want to freak people out with a virus he knew was bad, and downplayed it, but then did Warp Speed, got the vaccine, and now wants credit for it, and is blaming people NOT getting his wonderful vaccine on Biden.
That makes sense to me. What actual fact breaks that narrative? Not suspicion, not implication. What is actually, factually wrong with my conclusion?
Trump, right now, calling the vaccine a “lifesaver” and “safe” and taking credit for it, despite him knowing it’s a poison, in order to avert a “years long shutdown” by the Deep State, even though Trump is supposedly coming back to office anyway and could have ended the shut down himself without distributing poison and endorsing it and calling it safe…
That doesn’t make sense to me. You can call it 5D non-linear time if you want, but as long as the world keeps being predictable by 4D logic and decision-making, and 5D logic starts showing actual changes and not just hints and theories, I can’t really justify abandoning 4D logic solely because of an unflattering conclusion being the only viable one.
There's really no end to your ego, is there? Reposting your prior post over and over - what, do you think everybody's stupid and you're the only smart one?
Telling people "your problem is" and "you're having a hard time envisioning" and "you still don't understand" -
It's all so disrespectful of others. Sounds like you think you're the only one who understands what's going on and you have the right answer to everyone's doubts.
There's nothing wrong with presenting your opinions or analysis of the situation, but when you have to keep getting in everyone's face and disrespecting them, you lose all credibility as far as I'm concerned.
You really sound like you think you're the only one who gets it. And anyone who has a different view from you is wrong. No humility or openness to others' views whatsoever. Doesn't help the board or the movement IMHO.
I absolutely expect deception from people. I am suspicious of everyone. I wear a mask despite being fully vaccinated because I value my anonymity and will wear one until I am no longer allowed.
I expect deception from Trump. I expect deception from Q. And when what they’re saying doesn’t reflect predictable reality, or if deciphering what they say requires me to assume things I cannot actually prove, then I assume deception instead.
In my very skeptical world, I am MUCH more ready to assume I’m being lied to by Trump and Q than to assume Trump is a secret codemaster or that Q is making prophecies in 5D nonlinear time. It makes more sense that I’m being lied to.
You keep assuming I have the wrong problem of being too trusting. The problem is quite the opposite. I don’t trust Q and have not seen a single thing he’s written that proves that he’s operating outside of known physics. That’s a sillier answer to me than assuming he’s just a nobody lying on the internet, like 99.999% of the internet.
I don’t have cable. A lot of my news actually breaks here. You guys almost certainly know more about what’s going on with the MSM than I do.
Reaching the same conclusions as someone else is not an endorsement. I agree with Q that the Earth is not flat, but Q’s opinion on it has nothing to do with my position nor lends any credence to my position.
I am also philosophically pro-life and have infuriated liberals when arguing it with them, but I don’t associate myself with the pro-life movement, because I think almost every argument made by pro-lifers is, at best, ineffective. I share an opinion with pro-lifers, but we aren’t exactly friends.
I share opinions with Trump, and I don’t like the man much.
I share opinions with Trevor Noah, and I’ve never once watched his show.
It’s okay to arrive at my own conclusions without worrying about popular opinion, wouldn’t you agree?
One reasonable explanation is that Trump doesn’t agree with you about Warp Speed not being about the virus. It was about the virus, and as Trump admitted, he was deliberately playing the virus down. On tape. And that it was “more deadly than the most strenuous flus.”
I know that you don’t believe that narrative, but it’s a narrative in which things that Trump has said and is currently saying make sense.
Trump didn’t want to freak people out with a virus he knew was bad, and downplayed it, but then did Warp Speed, got the vaccine, and now wants credit for it, and is blaming people NOT getting his wonderful vaccine on Biden.
That makes sense to me. What actual fact breaks that narrative? Not suspicion, not implication. What is actually, factually wrong with my conclusion?
Trump, right now, calling the vaccine a “lifesaver” and “safe” and taking credit for it, despite him knowing it’s a poison, in order to avert a “years long shutdown” by the Deep State, even though Trump is supposedly coming back to office anyway and could have ended the shut down himself without distributing poison and endorsing it and calling it safe…
That doesn’t make sense to me. You can call it 5D non-linear time if you want, but as long as the world keeps being predictable by 4D logic and decision-making, and 5D logic starts showing actual changes and not just hints and theories, I can’t really justify abandoning 4D logic solely because of an unflattering conclusion being the only viable one.
Great explanation.
I understand, this is a war. People die in wars.
There's really no end to your ego, is there? Reposting your prior post over and over - what, do you think everybody's stupid and you're the only smart one?
Telling people "your problem is" and "you're having a hard time envisioning" and "you still don't understand" - It's all so disrespectful of others. Sounds like you think you're the only one who understands what's going on and you have the right answer to everyone's doubts.
There's nothing wrong with presenting your opinions or analysis of the situation, but when you have to keep getting in everyone's face and disrespecting them, you lose all credibility as far as I'm concerned.
You really sound like you think you're the only one who gets it. And anyone who has a different view from you is wrong. No humility or openness to others' views whatsoever. Doesn't help the board or the movement IMHO.
I absolutely expect deception from people. I am suspicious of everyone. I wear a mask despite being fully vaccinated because I value my anonymity and will wear one until I am no longer allowed.
I expect deception from Trump. I expect deception from Q. And when what they’re saying doesn’t reflect predictable reality, or if deciphering what they say requires me to assume things I cannot actually prove, then I assume deception instead.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
In my very skeptical world, I am MUCH more ready to assume I’m being lied to by Trump and Q than to assume Trump is a secret codemaster or that Q is making prophecies in 5D nonlinear time. It makes more sense that I’m being lied to.
You keep assuming I have the wrong problem of being too trusting. The problem is quite the opposite. I don’t trust Q and have not seen a single thing he’s written that proves that he’s operating outside of known physics. That’s a sillier answer to me than assuming he’s just a nobody lying on the internet, like 99.999% of the internet.
I appreciate that.
I don’t have cable. A lot of my news actually breaks here. You guys almost certainly know more about what’s going on with the MSM than I do.
Reaching the same conclusions as someone else is not an endorsement. I agree with Q that the Earth is not flat, but Q’s opinion on it has nothing to do with my position nor lends any credence to my position.
I am also philosophically pro-life and have infuriated liberals when arguing it with them, but I don’t associate myself with the pro-life movement, because I think almost every argument made by pro-lifers is, at best, ineffective. I share an opinion with pro-lifers, but we aren’t exactly friends.
I share opinions with Trump, and I don’t like the man much.
I share opinions with Trevor Noah, and I’ve never once watched his show.
It’s okay to arrive at my own conclusions without worrying about popular opinion, wouldn’t you agree?