Raffensperger is done. This is proof he staged a phony audit that never happened!
Not only was the memo created last Friday, but It was created last Friday by Pro V&V’s owner, Jack Cobb.
This revelation leaves little possibility for any plausible explanation other than the Georgia Secretary of State’s office contacted Pro V&V who created the memo to provide in response to our FOIA request.
...
Not only was the audit performed by an uncertified vendor at the time, but the report also states that both four and six counties were selected for review in their audit. The firm looked at no ballots.
Wonder where the money for the phony audit went, too. So not only are they gonna lie to the taxpayer, they’re gonna charge them for the privilege of being lied to.
One thing to keep in mind regarding the "memo for field audit.pdf" with a date of July 16.
The email from November 12 contains an attachment, "Memo for field audit.docx"
The PDF was authored by the CEO of Pro V&V.
This could clearly be a case where, simply, CEO was asked to provide that document and instead of sending the original Word doc, printed it to PDF ("Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word") on the 16th. The date on the memo header may be an auto-filled field using the system's current date/time.
Can't say definitively that's what happened, but it could be a completely innocent explanation.
ℕ𝔼𝕆ℕ ℝ𝔼𝕍𝕆𝕃𝕋
Holy crap.
Raffensperger is done. This is proof he staged a phony audit that never happened!
...
Wonder where the money for the phony audit went, too. So not only are they gonna lie to the taxpayer, they’re gonna charge them for the privilege of being lied to.
Yikes.
Things that make you go Hmmmm.
Need to do a bit more digging on this one. It could be that they captured the data from the report for the FOIA request.
Worth looking at but I'm not 100% on this one yet.
One thing to keep in mind regarding the "memo for field audit.pdf" with a date of July 16.
The email from November 12 contains an attachment, "Memo for field audit.docx"
The PDF was authored by the CEO of Pro V&V.
This could clearly be a case where, simply, CEO was asked to provide that document and instead of sending the original Word doc, printed it to PDF ("Acrobat PDFMaker 11 for Word") on the 16th. The date on the memo header may be an auto-filled field using the system's current date/time.
Can't say definitively that's what happened, but it could be a completely innocent explanation.
Anyone notice that the signatures on the summary root are the same font?
The 'en' combination in Wendy Owens' "signature" are fake.
This while thing is fake and gay.