Babbit was staged to disperse the crowd on Jan5th early, by whitehats, to ensure the insurrection angle played poorly.
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (115)
sorted by:
I keep going back and forth on Ashli Babbit (AB). Can't determine which I believe:
AB was lead to the slaughter by the DS with John Sullivan there to capture on video so that the "insurrection" would potentially escalate (that failed) and at the very least the DS could use it for their narrative that it was a deadly attack.
AB was DS and played the part (actually not shot) to further the narrative listed in 1
AB is White hat operative, they used that dumbass John Sullivan to unwittingly record what happened and make it seem like she was shot, thus ending the "insurrection" before things really got crazy for real.
The whole thing went down just like the MSM has portrayed it (most unlikely scenario, IMO)
They needed innocent blood on their ground
Doesn’t Nancy call the Capital their Temple?
Remember Chaz on 'Capital Hill' in Seattle, that was their proxy, also human sacrifice... bled out on the ground
Chaz is probably a demon’s name(?)
but then why does Trump constantly ask "who shot Ashley Babbit"? To wake people up to the fact that it was fake?
I think it is more about sending a message to them that he knows it was fake.
He is puttng them in an bad position ...they are either guilty of killing in cold blood or they are guilty of a false flag attempt...
That is awesome thinking. Big up vote
Hoping (and betting) on Scenario #3.
Then the shooter dude would have to be in on it.
I dont think this event cleared the capital, no one really bought it.
It was designed to get Patriots violent and the video was going to be justification for the police shooting....it didnt work and they been running cover ever since the debunk vid went viral
It's definitely a bizarre situation, not as cut-and-dry as the media would have us think.